Likely you haven't heard of Pilgrims Group. References to company in the media are extremely rare. However, they're well known to Western news outlets - they provide protection services to journalists in hostile environments, and embed their security specialists in news crews.
Pilgrims Group was active on the ground in Ukraine from the early days of the US-orchestrated Maidan coup in 2013, and within mere hours of #MH17 generated multiple teams to ferry journalists around, thus maintaining a high degree of editorial control over their output.
One Pilgrims Group-shepherded news team won an award for its #MH17 coverage. Another in Syria also received plaudits, in 2015. The very next year, PG was pitching to train Syrian opposition fighters in the art of killing on behalf of British intelligence.
Important to consider given media coverage, and thus official investigations, of #MH17 heavily influenced by SBU and Bellingcat. This effort cemented from day one conclusion Donbas separatists were guilty, and discredited all alternative explanations for the incident.
Pilgrims Group heavily active in Ukraine today. Its teams have "special police" and MoD backgrounds, provide "logistics and equipment to media crews covering the conflict," and have embedded "dozens" of "security consultants" in "almost all major international news organsiations"
Curiously, when British intelligence was conducting extensive target audience analyses of Eastern European populations in service of "weakening the Russian state's influence" many years later, how these people perceived the Kremlin's role in #MH17 was a key consideration.
Of course, #IntegrityInitiative was also involved in warping perceptions on #MH17. One of its operatives was a "continuous guest" on LBC the night it went down, and the organisation sought to understand why Russian-speakers rejected Kremlin culpability for the disaster.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵: Interesting flurry of critical reporting on Nord Stream sabotage today. Of course, major motivation is damage control following Sy Hersh's article, but I suggest overriding purpose is preparing the ground for Ukraine to be comprehensively thrown under the bus by the West.
NYT careful not to blame Zelensky personally, but throughout there are nudges and winks. A "pro-Ukrainian group" was responsible. Ukraine had "most logical potential motive to attack the pipelines." It might have been conducted by a "proxy force" connected to Kiev.
Near the end, we get to the crunch. "Ukrainian involvement could upset relationship [with] Germany, souring public support...Findings that put blame on Kyiv could prompt backlash in Europe and make it harder for the West to maintain a united front in support of Ukraine."
Shift continues apace. Latest entry from the NYT: Ukraine cannot win without direct US/NATO involvement, which isn't going to happen, Western arms stocks are empty and not getting replenished anytime soon, and weapons Kiev needs won't/can't be given.
What's more, the longer this goes on, the further Russia can damage Ukraine politically and economically, making EU and NATO membership even more unlikely, and a counteroffensive by Kiev is likely to risk the loss of yet further territory.
Opening para remarkable - Putin's "greatest blunder was giving West impression Russia could lose war" against "supercharged, savvy Ukrainian patriots". That was in fact "impression" given by the media. And now they admit it was never true...
🧵: Shift in media narrative on Ukraine of late extraordinary. Exhibit A: February 7 NYT column from neocon POS Christopher Caldwell. He openly states Kiev "is losing the war", while Russia has "an intact economy and superior military technology."
Caldwell warns US no longer “helping” or “advising” or “supplying”, but *replacing* Ukraine as Russia’s "main battlefield adversary." Washington "is fighting" - "participating in military operations at the moment they happen." And this situation could get much more dangerous.
Caldwell cautions war is "not a clash of values" but struggle for "territory and power", and Russia has "fewer good options for backing down than US policymakers seem to think." As @TheGrayzoneNews has exposed, it's Britain that thinks Moscow will eventually yield. God help us...
This article is so, *so* bad, difficult to know where to begin. The Nation published some (award winning) articles by @AaronJMate on Russiagate, and has failed to be "critical of Putin’s management of the coronavirus" (?!?!), so it's a Russian disinfo outlet...
Author also takes umbrage at @AaronJMate "dismissing stories about Russia’s offer of rewards for killing US personnel in Afghanistan". Which the Biden administration has admitted was completely false (not that it made any sense in the first place).
Unsurprising published by Spyline Times. Its propriertor Peter Jukes is a psychopath, and pathological liar, who has enriched himself off by spinning absolute fantasies about Russian meddling. He loathes Aaron for exposing this bullshit but refuses to debate him. I wonder why?
Last year, @chloehadj-iMI6eou made dire hatchet job BBC 'documentary' starring British intel asset @paulmasonnews, targeting academics @jrschlosberg and @Tim_Hayward_. She subsequently contacted Justin's employer falsely alleging he'd spread "disinformation" about COVID19.
That seems to have been an attempt to get @jrschlosberg fired. And, as @Tracking_Power and I documented for @TheGrayzoneNews, there are very strong grounds to believe the 'documentary' was produced at the behest of British intelligence:
Oddly, right around the time the documentary was in production, @paulmasonnews and @Londonstani were discussing in secret how to take down @TheGrayzoneNews. They wanted @chloehadj involved. We understand she aggressively probed Tim and Justin about us during their interviews.
In 2007, Saakashvili ordered the assassination of Badri Patarkatsishvili. Security service operatives suggested poisoning him with a particular substance. "You smear [it] on the door handle," they said - the alleged method by which the Skirpals were struck with novichok.
BuzzFeed's execrable 2017 From Russia With Blood series attributes Patarkatsishvili's death to the Russians, based on claims of anonymous US spooks. The series was fundamental to cementing the notion of Kremlin-directed murders on British soil in the year prior to Salisbury.
In the wake of the Skripals' poisoning, the British government announced it would review the 14 "suspicious" deaths BuzzFeed attributed on the basis of zero evidence whatsoever to Russia. Five months later, it was confirmed there was no basis for reopening the cases.