there's a curdled *spite* that's evident in people like @NateSilver538 and @mtaibbi and @bariweiss, not to mention the racist pseudoscientists and "dark intellectual" cranks they're inclined to heed—the @lesswrong / @slatestarcodex people. they stink of academic failure.
(1/x)
@AEI propagandist @charlesmurray is another example. a genuine scientist humiliated him and Murray still grumbles—he's still festering with resentment that he's been kicked into the right-wing fringe. the "American Enterprise Institute" may sound impressive but it's not.
(2/x)
Murray knows that @AEI is basically a fake, a right-wing imitation college or research institute, giving the world nothing but copious propaganda—and he regards that marginal position as something other than his own fault. it's Commies or Jews or "wokeists", or whoever.
(3/x)
same with @bariweiss and @mtaibbi languishing at @SubstackInc, and @NateSilver538 being @NateSilver538—these people are all famous, blessed with privileges and money and mass audience, and yet they still feel left out. they're not the smart and cool kids and it galls them.
(4/x)
SOMEONE is to blame for @NateSilver538's mediocrity, and it surely can't be Nate Silver himself—he's a genius! he's smarter than ALL those polysyllabic eggheads who laughed at him in school, every time he answered a question with a typical wad of pseudo-intellectual mush.
(5/x)
why they can even type more than one coherent tweet at a time. @NateSilver538 is especially irritated by that.
it's sometimes entertaining to watch the antics of a pack of spiteful children who are still nursing schoolyard grudges and delusions of intellectual greatness.
(6/x)
but it's also been ruinous to #journalism. the triviality of celebrity "influencers" like @NateSilver538 and @jonathanchait, with their shallow social-column approach to American politics, forever fixated on polls as if they were news, has been lethal to us.
~Chara of Pnictogen
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
the Pnictogen Wing has a hypothesis about @elonmusk's decision to ruin the public @Twitter API—it's not a hypothesis we've too much confidence in, but still we offer it: we think ONE of the purposes of doing this was to make Musk's own Twitter activities harder to analyze.
(1/x)
yes, there's lots of other reasons that the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @GOP#Twitter fash gang would have for destroying the ability of outsiders to write Twitter applications. the fash crowd themselves make heavy use of bots, sock-puppet accounts, and other Twitter trickery.
(2/x)
and of course there's also the fact that @elonmusk's been destroying @Twitter's ability to make money, long-term. he's in "vulture capitalist" mode—squeezing as much short-term money as he can from his own cultish #Twitter fandom before he finally auctions off the corpse.
there's a very vague idea for a thread I've been chasing around my head all day. let me see if I can tease it out. I'll tell you the starting point: the writing of Mr. William Gibson (@GreatDismal) and his oft-quoted sentiment that the very rich aren't remotely human.
(1/x)
that quote still *bothers* me. I've admitted this before (to Mr. @GreatDismal, even)—I have an immense inward aversion to thinking about anyone like that. even Elon Musk, grotesque as he is...I've tried over and over to find some trace of healthful human emotions in him.
(2/x)
it's taken me a long time to come to grips with what separates someone like @elonmusk (and this maybe goes for his fanclub too—@mtaibbi, @bariweiss, @ShellenbergerMD, whoever) from someone like me. and it's not the *money* and *privilege* and *success* I'm thinking about.
one thing that right-wing people (like @NateSilver538) don't quite get about being "right wing": whatever these people *call* themselves, however they choose to label themselves, in reality they're as *right wing* as their most extreme right-wing beliefs, firmly held.
(1/x)
@NateSilver538 endorses the racist conspiracy approach to the #COVID19 crisis, i.e. "permit millions to die while blaming it all on China", and that's a *far right wing* belief. it doesn't matter what ELSE Nate Silver thinks he believes—it's not likely he even quite knows.
(2/x)
(sadly, one can't assume that someone like @NateSilver538 is ever in possession of very much self-awareness. he lies to everyone, *especially* himself.)
even if Nate Silver has some vaguely liberal or leftist ideas, they're bound to wither and disappear over time.
purity is the obsession of bigots, who define themselves as perfect and hence demand perfection in others.
one sees that arrogance constantly in the behavior of bigots like @NateSilver538 and @Cernovich. they act like nothing matters more than their approval.
(1/x)
Christians habitually have been obsessed with purity and perfection, which they only ever find in things they can't really see. there's a kind of diffuse Gnostic fallacy that pervades Christianity—a belief that there's something intrinsically sinful about *matter itself*.
(2/x)
I value many of the insights of Gnostic Christians but I don't agree with that one—I can't make myself think of the physics and chemistry of the Cosmos as somehow *broken*. if the Gnostics are right, and the work of the Demiurge is flawed...I don't blame the *materials*.
I'd like to talk about one of the most reliable weapons of bigotry. it's especially a "toxic male" thing—you can view "toxic masculinity" as a form of bigotry, being bigoted about being male—but it's a general-purpose weapon for bigots. @bindelj and @Docstockk use it.
(1/x)
it's *indignation*. point out something unpleasant to a bigot, and they take refuge in sputtering "how could you ever say such a thing??"
the *indignant* person is basically throwing the entire conversation to the ground and stamping on it, refusing to communicate any further, for you've said something so _appalling_ that no more words can be said other than "you're insane" and "how could you" and so forth.
we feel like maybe we should finally read up on #CSLewis's correspondence; there's a volume, edited by Warnie Lewis and Walter Hooper (whom we do not trust) and who knows what might have been left out, but at least it's a start.
we have...well, inklings.
~Chara
that's not an allusion to Prof. Williams (who has...been in correspondence with us) but rather our fears that Lewis might have catalyzed the growth of the American racist right-wing, the "evangelical" movement that formed as a reaction to Black civil rights struggles.
~Chara
it's not well enough appreciated, the degree to which modern American #Christianity in its hyperpolitical extremist form—@PastorMark Christianity, @RepMTG and @RickSantorum and @GOP fascıst Christianity—is specifically a racist reaction to strife for Black civil rights.