Yesterday we sent an urgent open letter to @michelledonelan with 25 other civil society groups. We called on the government to scrap the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill and the attack on our data protection rights. Here's why.
@michelledonelan The #DPDIBill lowers the threshold for organisations to refuse a Subject Access Request and removes individuals’ right to not to be subjected to solely automated decision making. 2/7
@michelledonelan The independence of the @ICOnews will be reduced by the #DPDIBill. As the ICO plays a key part in the oversight of the government’s use of data, this is extremely problematic. 3/7
@michelledonelan@ICOnews The #DPDIBill means that the Secretary of State could make changes to increase data the ways that data is used and reused without meaningful parliamentary oversight. 4/7
@michelledonelan@ICOnews The #DPDIBill gives the Secretary of State the discretion to approve international data transfers to countries with insufficient data protection standards. This will make the UK a hub for data laundering. 5/7
@michelledonelan@ICOnews Changes to Data Protection Impact Assessments remove the requirement to consult with data subjects who are affected by high risk processing. 6/7
@michelledonelan@ICOnews We need a data protection law that builds on the protections created by the #GDPR. People’s rights, not government control or corporate profits, should be the basis of any new legislation. #DPDIBill
⚠️ The government has announced revisions to the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. It appears that the revised version will be worse than the last, posing a greater threat to our privacy rights. Our response to today's announcement. #DPDIBillopenrightsgroup.org/press-releases…
"The UK has an opportunity to create a world-leading data protection law that puts people’s privacy rights at the fore, and aligns with our biggest markets. Instead, this appears to be an attempt to take power from citizens and give it to government" @burkeabigaile#DPDIBill
@burkeabigaile The revised #DPDIBill fails to address the privacy concerns raised by civil society, despite our open letter signed by 26 organisations. In fact the Bill expands the ways that businesses and government bodies can process, use and re-use our data. openrightsgroup.org/press-releases…
We’ve signed an open letter @RishiSunak on how the #OnlineSafetyBill threatens UK cybersecurity. The Bill introduces content scanning on our devices, compromising end-to-end encryption for individuals and business @encryption_day
Installing content scanning software on our devices with access to our private messages and images is an open goal for the surveillance of an entire population.
🚨Twitter Passports are dangerous and impractical 🚨
Banning anonymity online will not solve the issue of abuse and will actually make people
less safe. THREAD (1/9)🧵
First, a massive amount of online abuse comes not from anonymous accounts but from those who are happy to spout hate in their own name. 99% of Twitter accounts suspended for racism during Euro 2020 were NOT anonymous. (2/9)
Second, most “anonymous” content is not actually anonymous. In nearly all cases, the individual can be identified via other details held by a platform if it becomes necessary. (3/9)