The @nytimes is a “Republican protection racket”. Its editors use linguistic tricks + word choices TO whitewash Republicans:
Instead of “extremists” “neofascists” “radicals” they’re “hard right” “right”
This piece astounds. The Republican proposal “defunds the police”. Not by a little.
Is it the @nytimes position that defunding counterintelligence by 50% is only a throw-away line?
Euphemism scoreboard:
Far right
Most conservative
conservative
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
The whitewashed “very serious person” was Trumps budget director. @AGSNYT were you alive for the Trump catastrophe? Why pay journos to whitewash his admin?
Euphemism scoreboard:
On the right
Far Right
Most conservative
conservative
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
Oh. The @nytimes “Republican normalization machine” is going full speed ahead.
“Politically charged” amazing @hillhulse this is legendary. The destruction of the US social safety net & Govt is framed in “politics”not consequences to Americans.
NYT accepts+propagates the GOP “austerity” frame.
As “independent observers” shouldn’t the authors get a statement from Republicans about tax increases?
Econ 101:more than one way to reduce a budget deficit.
Accepting the GOP refusal to any popular/needed increases helps GOP
Reminder. Stop supporting @nytimes with your wallet and esteem. Support smaller local outlets and independent journalists.
RT: Question for @nycscribe what is the Editorial position of NYT on the most accurate descriptor for @RepMTG
The headers above the sections, about NAZIS (!), read:
-Finding people with like minds
-A nice way to go about it
-Projecting power
-“It’s a good way to relate to normal people”
-The face of hate
Barring one, these might as well have been written by a PR firm. 2/
According to Fascist Quarterl— er, we mean @NPR, the Nazis are a scrappy, admirable bunch of go-getters with the gumption to “punch above their weight and get noticed.”
This is a huge development. Credit to the @washingtonpost who see that the agenda-setting hate-for-profit network #fox lies at a massive scale is an important story.
Why @SallyBuzbee won’t say lies is an indictment of institutional weakness.
But +1 for putting this story A1
But what do @nycscribe & @AGSNYT do as Rupert Murdoch IN HIS OWN WORDS says that Fox is a political arm that will do all it can to help GOP?
Not front page.
The @nytimes has a proven track record of enabling corporate interests and whitewashing Republican incompetence in governing. #EastPalestine
A1 today criticism of EPA (Biden Admin) from a local “diner equivalent” = misinformation.
🧵
It’s as if NYT has an ax to grind with the EPA/Biden admin that it suppresses how the Republican Governor has handled the situation.
Did these journalists know the Gov refused Biden’s offer immediately after the accident?
Those of us NOT depending on the NYT do.
Context. Context. Context. Did the NYT reporters of which 5 contributed to this piece ASK what the central pizza owner thinks of Republican deregulation policies that LED to this type of accident?
Stenography that fits a narrative that NYT Editors want.
Fred Ryan (Republican) publisher of the @washingtonpost pays editors who reinforce Republican-friendly narratives. Let’s walk through todays A1 piece abt the impending preventable catastrophe of #DebtCeiling
☝️ @TonyRomm +editor construct a frame that the Republican hostage-taking of the US economy is a responsible and legitimate strategy.
“Urgency for a deal” when Republicans are not acting in good faith or consistency.
Next Tony emphasizes the frame that the deficit is “bothsides”
Tony parrots GOP disinformation “two years of Dem control”. Is this true @TonyRomm ? If yes let us know you think so. If not why be a stenographer?
Oh and it’s most legitimate economists warning - not only the Biden administration.