Share this page!

Jason Foster Profile picture
Twitter logo
Mar 14 • 3 tweets • 3 min read
The 1st Amendment is truly dead to them.

@HouseJudiciary Dems actually wrote this in their hit job on @FBI #Whistleblowers, yet no one in legacy media called them on it:

"No law protects" those presenting their "personal opinions" to Congress. Image
For those confused about 1st Amendment and #whistleblower protections—both reflect core free speech principles vital to preserving liberty and self-governance.

These are foundational American values that ought to unite people of good will.

fordhamlawreview.org/wp-content/upl… ImageImage
Another example. #Whistleblowers need the 1st Amendment and vice versa. Now more than ever. Read about former FBI Agent Mike Zummer’s petition to the Supreme Court.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jason Foster

Jason Foster Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JsnFostr

Jason Foster Profile picture
Mar 5
...and the @washingtonpost also issued a correction (much more professional than @RollingStone, thank you @McDanielJustine).

The @HouseDemocrats hit job on @FBI #whistlelbower @RealStevefriend caused a lot of confusion about the facts—precisely what it was designed to do.
The half-truths and deceptively edited sections of leaked transcripts presented the media scribes trying to quickly summarize it for their readers a lot of material for a political narrative, but not much context or guidance for understanding the facts.
On @realstevefriend's protected #whistleblower disclosure about unnecessary SWAT operations, a @WashingtonPost story originally claimed:
Read 8 tweets
Jason Foster Profile picture
Feb 2
New FOIAs to @FBI and @JusticeOIG on #whistleblower retaliation against @RealStevefriend
The @FBI stripped @RealStevefriend of his paycheck with no due process, w/o any investigation. He remains an FBI employee in a leave w/o pay status.
Then the @FBI refused to provide @RealStevefriend’s records to him as required by the Privacy Act, which hinders his ability to look for other work.
Read 9 tweets
Jason Foster Profile picture
Jan 5
THREAD: Stop listening to people who repeat ad nauseam that nothing else can happen until after a Speaker is elected.

#1 & #10 below means that a block of 1/5th of the Members (87 out of 435) could force other business.

The House does not have to be paralyzed.
#1 The Constitution requires a recorded vote if sought by 1/5th.

#10 Members-elect can make motions and propose resolutions.

So any Member could seek recognition and move that, for example, the Clerk be empowered to swear-in Members-elect. Then 1/5th (87) could force a vote.
If a majority supported the motion, the Clerk could then swear-in Members-elect.

By the same procedure, other basic business could be conducted to temporarily organize the body, alter procedures/timing for the Speaker's election, even pass key legislation.
Read 4 tweets
Jason Foster Profile picture
Aug 29, 2022
"Mr. Grassley told The Times on Monday that Mr. Thibault’s departure from the FBI would not resolve questions about his political bias impacting federal investigations."
"Mr. Thibault’s blatant partisanship undermined the work and reputation of the FBI. This type of bias in high-profile investigations casts a shadow over all of the bureau’s work that he was involved in...
..., which ranged from opening an investigation into Trump based on liberal news articles to shutting down investigative activity into Hunter Biden that was based on verified information,' Mr. Grassley said in a statement to The Times."
Read 4 tweets
Jason Foster Profile picture
Aug 29, 2022
My latest @FDRLST column, exploring why the @FBI has lost so much public trust.

thefederalist.com/2022/08/29/the…
The FBI’s recent history of mishandling controversial investigations into Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump has undermined public trust and polarized views of the Bureau along political lines.
Following the unprecedented FBI raid of President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, Vice President Harris said she had “full confidence that the Department of Justice will do what the facts and the law requires.”

Why? Nearly half the country is much more skeptical, and with good reason.
Read 7 tweets
Jason Foster Profile picture
Aug 11, 2022
New Questions for the Record for @FBI Dir. Wray, from @ChuckGrassley...

grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…

1. You can't find what you won't look for. The @FBI sought no warrant for the Clinton laptops. Instead it negotiated and agreed not to look at the most important stuff.
2. What's the basis for the warrant? Let's see the affidavit. Is there a filter team to segregate things not related to a narrowly scoped investigation negotiated with the target's attorneys—as was done with Clinton?
3. Why the runaround on the Qs about Biden/foreign gov't bank records and the declassified Crossfire Hurricane documents?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(