The plea argued that the notices have been issued in violation of Section 160 of CrPC with mala fide intentions to harass him and that at the time of the alleged offence, Yadav was a minor. #DelhiHighCourt@yadavtejashwi#CBI#LandForJobScam
It has been stated that even though Yadav is a resident of Patna, he is being asked to appear for questioning in Delhi, which is contrary to the proviso to Section 160 of the CrPC.
Delhi High Court to hear shortly Delhi Police's appeal against a trial court order discharging Sharjeel Imam, Asif Iqbal Tanha, Safoora Zargar and eight others in the Jamia Violence case. #DelhiHighCourt#SharjeelImam#JamiaViolence
While discharging the accused, ASJ Arul Verma had pulled up the Delhi Police for making Imam and others a 'scapegoat' for its own failure in apprehending the actual perpetrators. #DelhiHighCourt#SharjeelImam#jamiaviolence @DelhiPolice
In the last hearing, the High Court had refused to expunge the remarks against the Delhi Police but ordered that it will have no impact on the ongoing investigation or proceedings against the accused.
Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court to continue hearing the Maharashtra politics case involving the tussle between Uddhav Thackeray and Ekanath Shinde factions of Shiv Sena
Sibal: Please refer to clause 2 as well of Article 180.. while office of speaker is vacant duty by deputy speaker and if speaker is vacant then governor can appoint on advice of council of ministers...
The Delhi High Court will hear today Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav's plea to quash the CBI summons asking him to appear for questioning in the alleged land for jobs scam. #DelhiHighCourt#TejashwiYadav@yadavtejashwi#CBI
CBI has issued three summons to Yadav, however he is yet to appear for questioning.
In his plea, Yadav has argued that the CBI issued the notices in violation of Section 160 CrPC and that the agency's conduct is mala fide.
The plea will be heard by Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma.
[Comments against Justice S Muralidhar] #DelhiHighCourt will hear today a suo motu contempt petition against Vivek Agnihotri, Anand Ranganathan and Swarajya magazine.
In the last hearing, Agnihotri had tendered an unconditional apology. However, the court had asked him to express remorse in person.
The case relates to Agnihotri and others' comments against the then Delhi High Court judge and current Chief Justice of Orissa High Court, Justice S Muralidhar after he granted bail to Gautam Navlakha. @vivekagnihotri#Contempt#vivekagnihotri@ARanganathan72
Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court to continue hearing the Maharashtra politics case involving the Uddhav Thackeray and Ekanath Shinde factions of Shiv Sena.
SG: Power under Article 174 to conduct floor test can be exercised only when govt is formed was dealt with Shivraj Singh Chouhan case and it is the good law
Why did Governor invite Mr Eknath Shinde and not interact with president of the party as to who should be invited...