In that study the fetal loss rate DOUBLED (4.2% to 9.8%) but had little impact on the overall number of fetuses.
This is how this information is hidden. That single slide should have been enough to prompt much more investigation, because it showed fewer fetuses in EVERY GROUP
But this is a DIFFERENT paper than the one Viki Male was (falsely) claiming to show a lack of effect on the fetus.
That paper was by Swingle at Uni Pennsylvania, here it is. Note one of the authors is Drew Weissman
Gotta say this looks like just a little bit of toxicity to me.
Now, think about this. If you lose the fetus prior to implantation due to drug toxicity, are you going to see that drug in the fetus?
Especially if you decide not to analyse the non-viable ones.
So you exclude the lost fetuses due to drug toxicity and then produce a plate in your study that shows that the fetuses that managed to avoid toxicity were the ones with the lowest drug transfer.
Giving you Viki's famous "the fetuses didn't glow" claim
And just for good measure, these two supposedly separate groups working on a separate paper have the same techniques and very similar looking plates.
What are the odds?
And remember when they told you "it stays in the arm" and denied it goes to the ovary?
You tell me whether they lied.
Look at the signal in the ovaries on A4 and B5.
Glowing. Hot.
And if you thought that was dramatic, wait till you see the uterus.
This is what a mouse uterus looks like. Like a lucky horsehoe.
Look at the signal in A4 and B5.
Lucky it doesn't get to the fetus eh?
So I'm not saying that the "non-glowing fetuses" are fake, but I'd like to see the original slides.
Especially now that we just found out that the peer review process in these papers appears to be a little "mates club" of pharma advocates.
So I'll finish here. It does seem that #PlacentaGate may be the tip of the iceberg in relation to the $cience around the safety of COVID vaccines in pregnancy.
NB: The LNPs referenced in these papers may be different from those in the mRNA COVID vaccines (we may never know), but they are all related compounds and designed for transfection of miRNA and mRNA.
Just a reminder that Sam Neill had exactly the same "rare" T-cell lymphoma that Michel Goldman developed after his COVID vaccines.
Goldman published his own case report. After the backlash he was forced to falsely claim that the vaccines "had saved millions" - yet he stopped taking the COVID vaccines that gave him lymphoma and he is still alive.
Sam Neill's death is being weaponised by vested interests to claim that the experimental CAR-T gene therapy that was used for him "worked".
If you see someone claiming that CAR-T therapy "works" remember to ask them whether they have vested interests in it. Most media accounts that are pushing it do. It is a high risk gene therapy that has no proven and verified success in the treatment of cancers.
Meanwhile it is also important to remember that these very lymphomas were predicted to be a consequence of spike producing vaccines - because independent research showed it. But that research was quashed by the @NIH. People died as a consequence and are still dying.
The only journalist who was prepared to cover this story is @BrokenTruthTV
He is still waiting for the @NIH to release the 490 pages of emails that they refused to release that contained information on the suppression of this scandal.
I was taught for years that @DrAndyWakefield had committed fraud - it was not true.
His prior paper - written with @PeterDaszak - showed that measles virus was a contributor to Crohn's.
The Lancet paper showed that bowel disease was a feature of severe disability after vaccination.
Wakefield had to be destroyed to protect the vaccine industry or it would have collapsed in 1998.
That is how the pharma industry works, but they can't do it alone.
In the case of the Wakefield saga, they were aided by the @bmj_latest who commissioned Brian Deer to fabricate a fake story about "fraud" because they were being paid by GSK and Merck - the very vaccine makers who stood to be eviscerated by the truth about their product's safety.
All this is documented (thread below).
The children in the paper were permanently disabled by the MMR vaccine and never, ever, got recognition. They are on track to die without ever having their vaccine disability recognised.
This is the worst travesty of the medical industry ever committed - because it was done for money.
Teenage pregnancies are a surrogate for underage sexual activity (which drives cervical cancer rates in the under 25s). In the UK they fell off a cliff in 2007 - the year the iphone came out and the HPV vaccine rollout started.
The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.
"No name" virus.
Really?
The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.
Why?
I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.
That was a lie.
It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.
We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?