Regarding the Hinman emails and speech drafts: the SEC has requested for them to remain sealed, even after Judge Torres’ ruling on summary judgment. I believe the emails and speech drafts will be made public at some point, regardless of Judge Torres’ decision on whether to seal.
If Judge Torres cites to or relies on the emails/drafts in making her decision, I am 75% sure that she will declare them “judicial documents” and order that they be unsealed (but with limited redactions). But even if she doesn’t, the emails and drafts are going to be made public.
Why am I so confident? There will be more enforcement actions filed, including against @coinbase @kraken and @BinanceUS, IMO. I predicted the exchanges would be sued for selling securities last year. I still believe it’s coming. But even before that, other litigation is ongoing.
@dragonchain was sued and is in active litigation. #DRGN is an ERC20 token governed by the Ethereum Blockchain. You don’t think they will seek to get these emails and drafts to help with their defense? There are orders already in place that have denied any privilege claims.
Rumor has it that 2-300 projects have been issued subpoenas and dozens of companies have received Wells Notices. @EleanorTerrett reported Gensler has beefed up his crypto enforcement team - and that’s after doubling it last year!

Look what @bgarlinghouse said about the emails.
We will be shocked? If you have an ERC20 token, governed by the Ethereum Blockchain, like #DRGN, you want those emails. It is actually more relevant to your defense than Ripple’s defense. If you’re an exchange being sued you will 💯 request these emails.
The bottom line is with all this future litigation, these emails will make it to the public. Of course, @CecereCarl filed a motion on behalf of @RoslynLayton to have these emails and drafts made public. I sent a FOIA request and intend to litigate it. The truth will see daylight.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John E Deaton

John E Deaton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnEDeaton1

Mar 13
PSA: FRAUD NOTICE

I’m sharing my experience with everyone here in case you encounter the same thing.

Either my Wifi at home was hacked or I’m a victim of a sim swap on my mobile phone.

Yesterday, my @UpholdInc App was frozen. I could not access my account on my phone.
I grabbed my laptop and tried to login to my Uphold account there. When I entered my email and password, the screen said “your account has been locked and you will get an email from Uphold for more information.” Within 5 minutes of trying to login at home, my cell phone rang.
The caller ID only said “Toll Free.” A man claimed to be from “UpHold Verification” and he said “I just sent you an email, did you get it?” I received an email that looked like this: 👇
Read 10 tweets
Mar 8
I said from the first day this case was filed that it was a major mistake for the SEC to sue @bgarlinghouse and @chrislarsensf individually, in a non-fraud case, alleging aiding and abetting. It placed a higher burden for the SEC to meet.
The SEC must show that the 2 executives were reckless from 2013 in not knowing #XRP was a security. The SEC must prove they were reckless in not knowing XRP was a security in 2013 despite the fact SEC enforcement lawyers were allowed to own and trade XRP until 2019 (6 yrs later).
Compare that reckless burden - going back to 2013 - with the fact that in October 2020 - 2 months before the lawsuit - the SEC stated to the public that no determination had been made regarding whether #XRP was a security and it may NEVER make such a determination.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 8
Voyager is another example of a federal judge deciding the SEC’s arguments are 💯 w/o merit.

Recent examples:

1) The @Ripple case: a federal judge, in a written ruling, literally stated SEC lawyers were being hypocrites and that they lacked faithful allegiance to the law.
In Ripple, the judge said SEC lawyers are more interested in advancing their own agenda than adhering to the law. Think about how significant that is. How do SEC lawyers enforce the law if they don’t themselves honor the law. As a former federal prosecutor, I’d be ashamed.
2) @LBRYcom case: soon I will be able to publish on @CryptoLawUS the transcripts of the last two hearings in the LBRY case. When you read them, you will see how the Judge pleaded with the SEC to provide clarity for the users of the platform and the secondary market.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 5
Technically, it was 12,600 #XRPHolders who joined the motion to intervene (today the putative class is more than 75K).

But think about the motion to intervene:

Thousands of retail digital asset holders asked a Federal Judge to make them actual defendants in a case!
Some people were like wtf is going on with this crazy ass motion to intervene. Many other people, especially lawyers, believed I was crazy for filing such an unusual and unlikely motion. I don’t blame them for thinking that b/c it was an unprecedented move.
Because the only time a motion to intervene in an SEC enforcement action was granted involved a spouse who wanted to protect her 50% interest in the marital assets that were in jeopardy.

I knew the Judge was very unlikely to name individual #XRPHolders or a class as defendants.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 4
I defend secondary market sales of #XRP as well as other tokens sold in the secondary market (ie #LBC), not @Ripple or @LBRYcom.

When I sued the SEC, people immediately called me the #XRP Attorney even though I disclosed up front that I owned more in #BTC & #ETH than #XRP.
I was shocked that more people didn’t read the Complaint 🆚 Ripple the way I did - b/c it attacked the token itself and didn’t focus on the circumstances surrounding the way Ripple offered and sold #XRP.

Many allegations about #XRP applied to all other tokens.

For example:
“The nature of XRP itself made it the common thread among Ripple, its management, and all other XRP holders.”

The “nature of XRP itself”?

Wtf does that even mean?

The SEC is asserting that by simply owning a token you are in a common enterprise with ALL other token holders!
Read 18 tweets
Mar 3
A lot of people are speculating on why @Ripple would file this now. Some people are saying its b/c Ripple knows it will lose or b/c they’re less confident. It’s a very simple reason why it was filed. The decision is from the Supreme Court and it was handed down only 4 days ago.
Judge Torres could possibly file her decision at any moment (or it could be 2 months longer). The point is: this isn’t a decision from a federal district court or even an appellate circuit court. This is a U.S. Supreme Court decision decided on February 28, 2023 - 4 days ago.
The Supreme Court’s decision is relevant regarding one of Ripple’s Affirmative Defenses: The Lack of Fair Notice violates the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution.

People overthink and try to look for reasons other than the obvious one.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(