The European Convention on Human Rights is one of humanities' greatest achievements: an international response from Allied nations to the Nazi Holocaust & other human rights violations during WWII, to ensure they never happened again.
The new UN human rights chief @volker_turk has urged the British government to reconsider its plans to deport asylum seekers to #Rwanda, warning that in the past similar “offshoring” schemes had led to “deeply inhuman” treatment of refugees.
In his first public comments on the controversy since taking office last year, Volker Türk rejected PM Rishi Sunak’s description of the £140million deal as “common sense”, saying that as well as being legally & ethically problematic it was also “very costly” & unlikely to work.
“You cannot offshore your responsibilities to another state in the way that is envisaged [by the UK Govt]. It does raise very serious concerns, both from an international human rights & international refugee law perspective.”
Asked whether the Govt should go back to the drawing board, he said: “Yes, absolutely.”
The high court ruled that the @Conservatives’ plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda was lawful, but also said the Govt failed to “properly consider the circumstances” of proposed deportees.
In December, the cruel & authoritarian #Rwandan government said that it only had capacity to receive about 200 people – less than 0.5% of the total who have crossed the channel in 2022 - nowhere near large enough to be a deterrent.
Türk, who succeeded Michelle Bachelet as the UN’s high commissioner for human rights in October, said there were “ways & means” for how Govts could tackle smuggling gangs & ensure that those in need of protection receive it, but that the #Rwanda Plan would likely do neither.
“Of course, it looks very dramatic to send people to Rwanda – but is it going to [do] the trick? I doubt that very much, and actually history proves it, if you just look at some of the things [we] saw in the Australian context.”
Türk said he had seen how Australia’s offshore processing centres on Nauru & Manus Island, Papua New Guinea, had been marked by human rights abuses. The latter was closed after the country’s supreme court ruled it illegal.
“The way that asylum seekers were treated in Nauru and Manus was deeply, deeply inhuman,” said Türk. He also asked the Govt to tone down its rhetoric & “emotional language”, having previously criticised Braverman’s “horrible” use of the word “invasion”.
“It’s not that there aren’t issues about irregular arrivals. That’s clear & it’s an issue that one has to deal with… but we have to take out the emotions, including some of the emotional language.”
Like the UK Govt's Rwanda Plan, the Nazi's Madagascar Plan aimed to forcibly relocate a minority population of Europe to East Africa. The plan was not viable due to a British naval blockade, but it functioned as an important psychological step toward the Final Solution.
The US State Dept '2021 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices' reveals Rwanda to be one of the most autocratic, authoritarian, & repressive regimes on earth, currently ranked 126th out of 167 countries for democracy.
'Harass, mislead, & polarize: An analysis of Twitter political bots’ tactics in targeting the immigration debate before the 2018 U.S. midterm election'.
This research analyzed the strategies of influential bots seeking to affect the immigration debate. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Researchers analyzed the strategies of influential bots seeking to affect the immigration debate before the 2018 US midterm elections. Findings reveal that the 10 most influential bots in our dataset all presented an anti-immigration viewpoint.
These bots both posted tweets & RTd other bot accounts’ tweets to give a false sense of authenticity & anti-immigration consensus. Bots’ messages relied on negative emotional appeals by spreading harassing language & disinformation likely intended to evoke fear toward immigrants.
“Following the outpouring of support for Gary Lineker & his compassionate stand on behalf of refugees, this government knows it is on the back foot & is once again ramping up the cruelty to distract from their own failures.”
- CEO, Freedom from Torture.
"We are concerned to hear that journalists from organisations judged to be critical of the government’s immigration policy have not been invited... Democracy depends on an open & transparent relationship between government and the media."
- Martin Bright, Index on Censorship.
“Index on Censorship believes that access to government ministers, both domestically and as part of international visits, should not be treated as a reward for favourable coverage.”
I've been researching twenty-first century UK non-broadcast 'news' articles featuring #TuftonStreet's ideologically extreme (deregulatory, anti-welfare, anti-union, low tax, free-market) 'think tank' (lobbyist) the 'Institute for Economic Affairs' (#IEA).
Counting articles is a relatively crude measure, but it's clear that the overwhelming majority present the the #IEA as disinterested/neutral, often using IEA reports & spokespeople to help frame or initiate stories. With very few exceptions, the IEA's funders are never revealed.
From 2000-2023, across all print & online non-broadcast UK news outlets, the #IEA is mentioned a staggering 9,175 times - predictably, mainly in Murdoch's, Barclay's, & Harmsworth's "newspapers":
The Times: 1,278
Sunday Times: 424
Times online: 457
"It is false to argue that only those who support war support our troops. It is entirely legitimate to support our troops while seeking an alternative to the conflict that will put those troops at risk."
Below, I'll just give the later part from Robin Cook's resignation speech - still one of the most important, ethical, truthful & moving speeches ever given in the UK parliament.
"Only a year ago, we & the USA were part of a coalition against terrorism that was wider & more diverse than I would ever have imagined possible. History will be astonished at the diplomatic miscalculations that led so quickly to the disintegration of that powerful coalition".
We know *precisely* what the reaction of the @Conservatives & the right-wing media would be to a @UKLabour PM making an ex-Goldman Sachs banker & one of its biggest donors, with zero media management experience, the Chairman of our @BBC - because it happened in 2001.
Here's what Raymond Snoddy, writing in Murdoch's Times on May 4th, 2001, shortly before the appointment of New Labour donor & ex-Goldman Sachs banker Gavyn Davies said about his proposed appointment:
"A few eyebrows were raised when Davies became @BBC vice-chairman, but moving up to Chairman would be a step too far. The reason is that he is irredeemably attached, privately & publicly, to New Labour."