Delhi Court to shortly hear bail plea of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia's in CBI’s case alleging corruption relating to excise policy for the year 2021-22.
Krishnan: sec. 41A notice given to me. I complied. Then came second round of notice, i responded seeking a little time. 28 February there was another notice. Then i was arrested and i am in custody. Dates of remand are matter of record.
Krishnan: Nothing exceptional has been stated by CBI which would warrant continued custody. Nothing on record to show that Sisodia will be threatening the witnesses.
Krishnan: Their only issue is about so called destruction of phones. Their case is that the date of reference by LG to CBI is relevant. What is the start point of investigation? It's the date of FIR. This is stretching things to beyond a point which is within four corners of law.
Krishnan: The fact that one phone was changed on the date the matter was referred by LG to CBI is a coincidence as he had no idea that any FIR would be registered.
Krishnan: It goes without doubt that I've deep roots in society. I've appeared every time i was called before CBI. I am a public servant. There have been 2 public servants in this case, allegations far graver than mine. But they are sent without arrest.
Krishnan: The entire FIR is based on matters post the tender and not pre tender. I have pointed out that these are govt policies, gone through various stages before finalization.
Senior Advocate Mohit Mathur: Admittedly, these are cases of Max 7 years of offence. When they gave sec 41A crpc notice, they didn't feel the need to arrest me. They justify arrest by saying that person didn't cooperate or answered fully.
Mathur: They keep on saying i didn't cooperate at time of my arrest, the fact that in remand application and subsequent remand application, they said same thing.
Mathur: There is obviously an element of doubt that there is nothing that can be elicited so there is a possibility that nothing can be elicited. So the incarnation cannot be justified.
Mathur: My movements are in public glare. Where is the apprehension that I will run away? When I've joined investigation, and when their rightful custody, which they claim, is over, any further custody is incarceration which is not justifiable.
Mathur: The matter went up to LG, he made certain points, suggestions came and they were incorporated.
Triple test (for bail) can't be thrown to the winds.
Mathur: Am i making a prima facie case worthy of trial, then i need not be detained. I dare say, my wife doesn't have anyone else other than me to take care. My son doesn't study in India, he just joined college last year. This ailment is a 20 year old ailment.
Mathur: These are ailments which can't be cured. The process is just degeneration.
Singh: Let me put things in perspective. They've put it very simply. Person we're dealing with is unprecedented with 18 ministries, we don't find that very often. He is the one who handles finance, also takes care of excise portfolio.
Singh: Very fairly, he asks his officers to make a report. The excise commissioner with his tema makes a team. This report upsets the simple man....this report was made by department.
Singh: Minister removes him and appoints another person and asks him to out a cabinet note. A draft of which is given to him in WhatsApp. And that note is to finalize and give it back and that has to be put because entire expert report was put in public domain.
Singh: To get over it, they said put it in public domain. Although we have statements that a particular type of comment was sought from public.
Singh: I'll reframe. I said that report was asked to be put in public domain. Whatever comments come they should be put befor GoM. Those comments, many of them, were sought in a particular manner in which the govt wanted. 3 legal opinions also were taken from interested parties.
Singh: These 3 legal opinions were from Mukul Rohatgi, former CJI Rajan Gogoi, and former Justice KG Balakrishnan. These reports also came. They advocated the status quo. It was taken by private players.
Singh: Rahul Singh did a mistake. He gave and annexed these legal opinions with the report which was to be given to cabinet. Cabinet meeting was there, this was draft cabinet note.
Singh: He called him whatever he could say to a public servant and asked for his removal. And more importantly, he might not be a flight risk, but he is a definite risk who will destroy evidence.
Singh: A new officer is then appointed. Change is very short and new officer is Sanjay Goel.
He is given charge. Next day, fresh draft cabinet note is prepared without those legal opinions being part of it and also no reference to whatever was done in time of Rahul Singh.
Singh: There are 4 senior officers who are telling us this in detail.
Singh: It's not only the mobile phones, files were also destructed. When all these things came out, an ex post facto approval was also tried to be taken. LG had asked he will not take decision, it will be taken by council of ministers. But there were decisions taken by him alone.
Singh: In May it was approved that decision will be taken by council of ministers.
LG had given 7 suggestions on 19 May 2021. On 20th, they started discussing and incorporated changes suggested. It was approved that deputy CM will not take any decision alone but he did so.
Singh: They sought an ex post facto approval for all those decisions.
Singh: It's not only about telephones, his notices and reply are there. He says because to upgrade the phone..or for some reason they must have been changed. There is no upgradation or done. In three months phone will be outdated?
Singh: Actually chats were happening in those crucial four months in 2021 and therefore frequent change of phones was happening. Because this wasn't the only department he was handling. Person is a saint till the time his irregularities are discovered.
Mathur: These adjectives that they are using...please refrain from using these words....
Singh: I am very serious that destruction of evidence was a constant practice. A person is otherwise innocent, i don't think it's an adjective, till the time illegalities are found. It's not adjective, it's a direct allegation.
Singh: On the other side, they also call agencies by various names. They have license to say whatever they want to say. They've been saying in this case, i don't know why it hurt them....
Singh: There is a public faith in its govt that they will act for their benefit. They will act fairly. But here, there are sufficient circumstances that I'll show where..
Judge: Were there any complaint from public?
Mathur: Sir, daaru sasti mil rhi thi, aur kya chahiye.
Singh: Our case is that 100 crores were given. Do we find this kind of money which comes through hawala? We've evidence that clauses after clauses were being given to them. And as it is they were made part of the policy, GoM report to be precise.
Singh: Between 14 and 17 March, 2021, South group had flown and was residing in Oberoi hotel. They reserved the conference room, have their meeting, prepared a note and take out printout...there is a bill of those 36 pages.
Singh: When we looked into computers, on 15 February, a note is prepared on the computer of Mr. Sisodia, there were two significant things. That the commission was stated to be 5 percent and requirements for eligibility for wholesale was 100 crores.
Singh: In April 2021, everything is prepared. It goes to LG. On 19 April, there is a note that a discussion happened with LG who suggested a point. That input is incorporated without any changes.
Singh: When licenses were being given, ultimately wholesale chunk had to come to them, there was an understanding with South group with some Indo Spirits, a blacklisted company.
Krishnan: Merely because a second view is possible, it doesn't make it a crime. When was the policy challenged on point of arbitrariness? On legal opinions, there are atleast 20 SC judgments which come down heavily on such opinions.
Complainant, Ankit’s father, had lodged a missing report when his son wasn’t found during the riots.
It was his case that his son was killed by Tahir Hussain and his associates, who gathered in his office and threw Ankit’s body in the drain after killing him.
#SupremeCourt to hear a batch of petitions seeking Scheduled Caste status for Dalit converts
Adv. Prashant Bhushan for one of the petitioners:This matter involved constitutional validity of the Schedule caste order by which it was provided persons belonging to religion other than Hinduism will not be considered as Scheduled Caste.
Bhushan: Later Buddhist religion and Sikh religion was added.
Delhi High Court restrains Income Tax authorities from acting on the Show Cause notice issued to Rajya Sabha MP and senior lawyer Kapil Sibal on March 11, 2023 in relation to assessment proceedings.
The court said the concerned officer will first dispose of objections preferred by Sibal. "In this context, the concerned officer will issue a notice to the petitioner which would indicate the date, venue and time of the hearing," said the court.
The concerned officer will pass a speaking order qua the objections preferred by the petitioner and a copy of the same will be furnished to the petitioner, a division bench of the court said in the order.
#DelhiHighCourt to shortly hear #DelhiPolice’s plea against discharge of #SharjeelImam, Safoora Zargar, Asif Iqbal Tanha and eight others in 2019 Jamia violence case.
Hearing before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.
The matter will be heard at 2:15 PM.
While issuing notice in the petition, Justice Sharma had said that the trial court’s observations against the investigating agency will neither affect further investigation nor the trial of any accused person.
Justice Gita Gopi: Here, the lawyers don't even call litigants to their chambers. Now, Foreign lawyers are going to come to India, and you all (referring to advocates present in courts) are going to get tough competition.
"Let's see how do treat litigants after that...The foreign lawyers will at least serve tea, and coffee to the litigants, and at least corporate culture will be there...I want to see what you do then (laughs)": Justice Gita Gopi
"Remember, one who is a farmer, his clothes look dirty. The cloth of the garage worker looks stained with oil...Never judge a person by the clothes he wears": Justice Gita Gopi
The Kerala High Court is set to hear the bail application moved by the CM's former Principal Secretary, M. Sivasankar, who had been arrested by ED in connection with money laundering related to the LIFE Mission case. #KeralaHC#MoneyLaundering#LIFEMissionCase
A Special PMLA Court at Kochi had rejected Sivasankar's bail application on March 2 and extended his custody till March 21. Sivasankar had moved the plea seeking bail on medical grounds. He had alleged the arrest as a 'political stunt'. #KeralaHC#LIFEMissionCase#MoneyLaundering