Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 Profile picture
Mar 28, 2023 13 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/ A 🧵ON THE @federalreserve's precedent-setting 86-page @custodiabank order, released on Friday. Custodia just published a blog post highlighting the newly-articulated Fed policies + the procedural abnormalities it reveals.
custodiabank.com/press/custodia…
2/ First, the policy items. Here are the first two:
3/ The third is new & raises lots of questions, esp since the Fed appears to have made a significant break from the President's Working Group's recommendation that #stablecoins only be issued by banks. There may be a new "catch 22" here:
4/ Related, there's increasing chatter about the Fed's own #CBDC project in the context of the Fed's actions regarding Custodia:🤔
5/ As I've said in recent interviews I've seen no evidence that the coordinated #crypto crackdown is about clearing the runway of private competitors to a #CBDC. But chatter about the topic is growing louder.

Speaking *personally* a U.S. retail CBDC is a hill worth dying on.
6/ The fourth gets into the role of States in the dual banking system, where both States & the federal govt (the OCC) have equal power to charter banks. The Fed just opened a new chapter in long tug-of-war re: Washington DC's efforts to federalize banking. States may take issue:
7/ The fifth is related--the Fed created a de facto new standard that all Fed member banks must be FDIC-insured (a "critical tool in preventing bank runs"). Hmmm...interesting in light of the bank runs at FDIC-insured banks that unfolded just weeks after the Fed wrote the order🤷‍♀️
8/ Next is a discussion of the procedural abnormalities--a few of which @custodiabank details in its post. (Here's a live link to the banking law expert's analysis referred to in the screenshot: bankregblog.substack.com/p/four-things-…)
9/ Banks especially may find these noteworthy:
10/ continuing...
11/ Per @custodiabank: "There are many other procedural abnormalities, but the above are likely the ones most relevant to other banks combing the Fed’s precedent-setting order for clues as to how the Fed will approach its future disclosure of confidential supervisory information"
12/ And on the topic of Fed disclosure of confidential supervisory information (CSI), here's what Fed vice chair Barr said just today (!)👇Compare his statement to the magnitude of CSI disclosure in the 86-page @custodiabank order. #WatchWhatIDoNotWhatISay
federalreserve.gov/newsevents/tes…
13/ Here's the closing of @custodiabank's blog. "#digitalassets are not going away, and neither is Custodia." As always, thanks for all of your support! 💪

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠

Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CaitlinLong_

Feb 18
1/ Prime Trust's bankruptcy Plan Admin recommended that its #crypto custody customers--who thought they owned the custodied assets--take a haircut. Amount not clear yet (Celsius custody customers took a 27.5% haircut). These situations were sadly avoidable. courtlistener.com/docket/6769170…Image
Image
2/ Context: bankruptcy is a process designed to maximize the recovery of assets for a bankrupt company's estate, while a bank's receivership is a process designed to protect a bank customers. When a non-bank fails, it goes to bankruptcy. When a bank fails, it goes to receivership
3/ So, the Prime Trust discussion is only a bankruptcy discussion because Prime Trust wasn't a bank.

Prime Trust went bust and has an asset shortfall, so a bankruptcy judge must decide whether its custody customers will get all their assets back or will take a haircut.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 29
1/ NEW BLOG: "How To Keep The #Bitcoin Strategic Reserve From Morphing Into A Bailout Fund." Did you know SBF publicly advocated for a crypto bailout fund just 1 month before FTX failed? Story 👇Lesson: don’t let future Sams hijack the SBR for a bailout!!!
caitlin-long.com/how-to-keep-bi…
2/ In the blog I analyze #bitcoin as a reserve asset (key is its favorable inflation rate differential)--but condition my support for a BSR on drafting legislation w/ 4 specific prohibitions to prevent insolvent-but-politically-connected people from ever using it for a bailout: Image
3/ The favorable inflation rate differential between #bitcoin & US dollar + strategic benefits make bitcoin worth considering as a reserve asset, but the consensus mechanisms of other #crypto can be too easily changed to permit higher inflation so I don't support including them: Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 10
🚨HUGE NEWS on #debanking & #OperationChokePoint2.0: a little birdie told me that @FDICgov Vice Chair Travis Hill just spoke at an ABA meeting & said there is no place at the FDIC for those who explicitly or implicitly supported its debanking initiative. Transcript not avail yet
Travis Hill is a Republican & is vice chairman of the FDIC—has been outvoted by Biden/Warrenites on the FDIC board, but that will change on Jan 20 when Gruenberg steps down.

👀 @nic__carter @CampbellJAustin @iampaulgrewal @vronirwin
It'll be soooooooo interesting to see if Hill went off-script. Don't forget Gruenberg's people still control the FDIC (head of comms is allegedly trying to silence online critics of #debanking, so I doubt such remarks would've made it thru official editing of his speech, which should be posted at this site soon):
fdic.gov/news/speeches
Read 4 tweets
Jan 6
1/ 🚨THE FED'S DEBANKER-IN-CHIEF IS OUT! Michael Barr, the last remaining Biden/Warren appointee who architected #OperationChokePoint2.0 at a federal financial agency, will resign as vice chair for supervision in Feb (see @nic__carter's March 2023 map👇).
federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pre…Image
2/ It was an open secret in DC that Trump was likely to fire him. He had a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad reign as Fed Vice Chair for Supervision--the WSJ covered only some of why 👇, calling him "a favorite of Elizabeth Warren" but omitting a lot:
wsj.com/opinion/a-fede…
3/ Barr siloed information within the Fed, as of Oct 2022 sending Fed supervision staff a memo prohibiting them from talking to other Fed governors unless they’d spoken with him first👇
Read 6 tweets
Dec 1, 2024
1/ NEW FACTS REVEALED: 2 years ago today, the Fed quietly hammered 5 banks & thereby kicked off its industry-wide dragnet against banks serving the #crypto industry. @joerogan & @pmarca recently made discussions about #debanking go mainstream, which makes today’s anniv notable.
2/ On the Sunday after Thanksgiving 2022 (11/27/22), the Fed hit the first of these 5 banks w/ regulatory actions targeting their crypto activities, and its blitz carried into the following work week. Thus began what @nic__carter would later dub #OperationChokePoint2.0.
3/ How did I learn these facts? I pieced together public info + info from insiders who came forward & filled in puzzle pieces for me. I know the 5 banks’ names but won’t disclose them here. Publicly-available info confirms @custodiabank was one of them.
Read 12 tweets
Nov 30, 2024
1/ HOW TO FIX THE U.S. DEBANKING PROBLEM, a 🧵by someone who set out to solve it but ended up repeatedly targeted by it (+ whose bank has a lawsuit against the Fed pertaining to it).

This is a #MeToo-type moment in banking, as stories are now pouring out.

How to fix it?
2/ As @pmarca alluded on @joerogan, the levers of power used/abused by federal bank regulators to effectuate #debanking are subtle & insidious. Multiple attempts have already been made to fix the problem. Why did they all fail? bc it's a multi-faceted problem that runs deep.
3/ Truly fixing the problem will require overhauling the federal bank examination process for operating banks. Why? a) subjective levers in federal bank exams have proven to be too easily politicized, b) confidentiality of supervisory info & c) no checks & balances in practice.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(