Madhya Pradesh High Court has initiated a contempt case against State Bar Council Chairman & its every elected member over continuing strike of lawyers in the state. State Bar Council, instead of resolving issue chose path of confrontation without justifiable cause, the HC said.
The Gwalior bench issued notice to them asking why it should not prosecute them for criminal contempt of court on account of them having compelled the lawyers to abstain from #judicial work "which is interfering and obstructing the administration of justice in the State."
Jabalpur bench of the high court had earlier initiated Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation in the matter and asked advocates to attend to their court work forthwith.
In the order passed on Monday, the Gwalior bench said the Chairman and the elected members of the State Bar Council have, "by their intransigence", unnecessarily precipitated the matter by declaring strike.
The plight of the Bar, specially the Junior Bar is well known and they find themselves in a “between the devil and the deep sea” situation are helplessness to go against the illegal diktat of the State Bar Council: High Court
The action on the part of the Chairman of the Madhya Pradesh State Bar Council and its elected Members amounts to Criminal Contempt as defined under Section 2(c)(ii) or (iii): High Court
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi HC quashes summoning order issued against online portal The Wire’s Editor and Deputy Editor in defamation case filed by ex JNU professor Amita Singh.
Singh had alleged that the publication imputed that she prepared dossier depicting JNU is a “Den of Organised Sex Racket”.
Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani quashed the summoning order dated January 07, 2017 issued by a MM Court.
The court observed that it was unable to discern as to how the subject publication can be said to have defamed Singh.
In her complaint, Singh referred to an article published by The Wire and alleged that its Editor did not verify the authenticity of the Dossier and used it for monetary benefits of its magazine, thereby defaming her reputation.
Petitioner: They should atleast give us a 6 month window. After 6 months, the rule can be implemented in a just and fair manner. Technology is always an enabler, it cannot be a disabler.
Over 350 lawyers from #SupremeCourt and various HCs issue a statement condemning the comment of Law Minister Kiren Rijiju that "few retired judges belong to anti-India gang".
"Such hectoring and bullying are unbecoming of the high office held by the Minister", the lawyers say.
"By threatening retired judges, the Law Minister is clearly sending a message to every citizen, that no voice of dissent will be spared.
We may remind the Minister that criticism of the government is neither against the nation, nor unpatriotic, nor “anti-India” "- statement adds
Some of the signatories of the statement. #SupremeCourt
CJI DY Chandrachud: ASG has submitted that Jharkhand has submitted report. Chattisgarh is yet to file compliance. Mr Sodhi says that Chattisgarh has already complied. Copy of the same shall be furnished to ASG during the next week.
Adv Gonsalves: Since 2020 attacks on Christians have increased. Tehseen Poonawala guidelines said that nodal officers must see if the FIR is registered. Nodal officers are notified but nodal officers are registering not a single case.