Live Law Profile picture
Mar 28 12 tweets 9 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Delhi High Court to pronounce today judgment in Delhi police’s plea against discharge of Sharjeel Imam, Safoora Zargar, Asif Iqbal Tanha and eight others in the 2019 Jamia violence case.

#DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma will pronounce the verdict at 10:30 AM. Order was reserved on March 23 last week after a detailed hearing of more than two hours.

#DelhiHighCourt #Jamiaviolence #SharjeelImam #SafooraZargar #AsifIqbalTanha
Read the details of the hearing here:
livelaw.in/news-updates/d…
Court has not assembled yet.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
The court has assembled.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Court: This court is not innovating jurisprudence of framing of charges which is already established by Supreme Court.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Court: Prima facie, as seen in the video, the respondents were in the first line of the mob. They were raising slogans of Delhi police murdabad and were violently pushing the barricades.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Court: The right to peaceful assembly is subject to reasonable restrictions. Acts of violence and violent speeches are not protected.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Court frames charges against 9 accused persons including Sharjeel Imam, Asiq Iqbal Tanha and Safoora Zargar under various offences including rioting of IPC.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
However, court partially discharges them of various other offences.

Court has charged accused Mohd. Abuzar and Mohd. Shoaib under sec. 143 of IPC. They have been discharged under other offences.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Court has charged Mohd Qasim, Mahmood Anwar, Shahzar Raza Khan, Umar Ahmad, Mohd. Bilal Nadeem, Sharjeel Imam and Chanda Yadav under sections 143,147,149,186,353,427 of IPC. They are discharged of rest of the offences as per FIR.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence
Court has discharged Asif Iqbal Tanha under sections 308, 323, 341, 435 of IPC. Charges under other offences have been framed against him.

#DelhiPolice #DelhiHighCourt #JamiaViolence

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Mar 29
Delhi HC quashes summoning order issued against online portal The Wire’s Editor and Deputy Editor in defamation case filed by ex JNU professor Amita Singh.

Singh had alleged that the publication imputed that she prepared dossier depicting JNU is a “Den of Organised Sex Racket”. Image
Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani quashed the summoning order dated January 07, 2017 issued by a MM Court.

The court observed that it was unable to discern as to how the subject publication can be said to have defamed Singh.

#DelhiHighCourt #JNU #TheWire
In her complaint, Singh referred to an article published by The Wire and alleged that its Editor did not verify the authenticity of the Dossier and used it for monetary benefits of its magazine, thereby defaming her reputation.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 29
#SupremeCourt hears MP High Court Bar Association's plea challenging complusory e-filing in courts and tribunals.

CJI DY Chandrachud: There is a help desk to help people...

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
Petitioner: This rule was made over night. There was no process of consultation and deliberation with stakeholders.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Petitioner: They should atleast give us a 6 month window. After 6 months, the rule can be implemented in a just and fair manner. Technology is always an enabler, it cannot be a disabler.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 30 tweets
Mar 29
#SupremeCourt hears plea seeking Uniform grounds of Divorce for all citizens of India.

The plea has been filed by @AshwiniUpadhyay and is being heard by a bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia #UniformDivorce Image
Ashwini Upadhyay: Total 17 items and 4 categories. It would be better if they're listed seperately on different dates.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia #UniformDivorce
CJI DY Chandrachud: Instead of us directing the law commission to prepare a report, we can just give you liberty to approach the law commission.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia #UniformDivorce
Read 6 tweets
Mar 29
Over 350 lawyers from #SupremeCourt and various HCs issue a statement condemning the comment of Law Minister Kiren Rijiju that "few retired judges belong to anti-India gang".

"Such hectoring and bullying are unbecoming of the high office held by the Minister", the lawyers say. Image
"By threatening retired judges, the Law Minister is clearly sending a message to every citizen, that no voice of dissent will be spared.
We may remind the Minister that criticism of the government is neither against the nation, nor unpatriotic, nor “anti-India” "- statement adds
Some of the signatories of the statement. #SupremeCourt ImageImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Mar 29
[Palghar Lynching Matter]

Petitioner: There is a new affidavit filed by State of Maharashtra saying that they can have a CBI enquiry.

Justice Narasimha: Has CBI agreed?

CBI: Yes, we have no objection.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
Justice Pardiwala: What is the status of the trial? Charge has been framed?

#SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
CJI DY Chandrachud: Ultimately, CBI can do it. Why should we pass an order?

#SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 4 tweets
Mar 29
#SupremeCourt hears plea alleging attacks against Christian priests and Christian institutions across the country.

The matter is being heard by bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud. court had earlier asked Jharkhand to file status report

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
CJI DY Chandrachud: ASG has submitted that Jharkhand has submitted report. Chattisgarh is yet to file compliance. Mr Sodhi says that Chattisgarh has already complied. Copy of the same shall be furnished to ASG during the next week.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Adv Gonsalves: Since 2020 attacks on Christians have increased. Tehseen Poonawala guidelines said that nodal officers must see if the FIR is registered. Nodal officers are notified but nodal officers are registering not a single case.

#SupremeCourt
#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(