🧵For those fretting that incremental measures in today's 🇨🇦 #Budget2023 will somehow fan the flames of inflation, please remember: The fiscal foot has been firmly on the brake for 2 yrs. Program spending is down 1/3 since COVID peak. Down 12% in first 9 mos of this fy #cnecon /2
And for those who believe inflation is caused by deficits, please remember: 98% of the COVID deficit has been eliminated. Deficit over 1st 9mos of this fy was just $5.5b (Fiscal Monitor). Year-end deficit may be padded in the budget. But the deficit is effectively gone. /3
And for those who claim giving a tidbit of aid to low-income households (through extension of enriched GST credit) will fuel inflation, please remember: the $2.5b cost of that credit = 0.4% of total consumer spending (over 6 mos). No possible impact on overall price level. /4
Moreover, since the first 6-mos GST credit expansion was announced last year, CPI inflation has come DOWN: from 7.6% (July, latest data before that announcement), to 5.2% now. If a bit of help to poor people caused inflation, it would have gone the other way. /5
Hand-wringing about the budget & inflation is all based on assumption inflation is caused by excess demand. That's being proved more wrong every day. Employment & wages are growing--but inflation is falling. Why? It wasn't caused by workers; & its TRUE causes are dissipating. /6
Working and low-income households need MORE help to survive inflation until the post-COVID price surge fully abates: more help with groceries and rent, wage gains that keep up, indexing provincial income supports. That's not causing inflation: that's protecting its victims. /7
Is a $2.5b GST credit expansion for low-income households the culprit for inflation? Let's look at dividends & buybacks by Cdn corporations (whose profits surged with inflation):
Growth in dividend pmts = $23b in 2022
Share buybacks ≈ $25b in 2022.
Together: 20 times as much. /8
In short, IF you believe inflation is caused by 'too much money' in the economy, not 'too few goods' (and that's a big IF), then take money away from those who are getting more--not from those whose living standards are being sacrificed by inflation that has made others rich.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In light of Loblaw's inept efforts on social media to justify its super-sized inflation-fueling profits, this is an opportune time to remind shoppers of four crucial economic facts regarding supermarket profitability: 🧵
A. Food retail profits have more than doubled from pre-pandemic norms. /3
B. Their higher profits are NOT the result of a constant profit margin collected from a growing base of sales. Claims to this effect are outright lies. The average margin has increased by three-quarters since the pandemic. /4
🧵Consumer prices fell 0.6% in 🇨🇦 in Dec., yr/yr CPI growth fell to 6.3% (from 8.1% in June). This is good. But lest anyone interpret this as evidence that Bank of Canada tightening is 'working', or relief is imminent, let's review the short history of this inflation. #cdnecon /2
Pandemic caused big breaks in global supply (not fully repaired yet) & big shifts in global demand (mostly, not fully, rebalanced). Govt stimulus maintained aggregate demand & prevented a depression. For a short time, demand exceeded supply (mostly due to constrained supply). /3
Quick phase-out of COVID supports then cut household spending power quickly; it is now below pre-COVID trend. Supply has rebounded but still not caught up to pre-COVID trend. We are currently in a situation where both supply and demand are below potential. /4
Also true in most other OECD countries too, incl. Canada and Australia (both have record-high profit shares). It is decisions by firms to increase prices that are the proximate cause of inflation, and they've been lifting them substantially more than their own costs require. /2
I'm amazed at how both the economic right & moral legitimacy of firms literally *causing* inflation are absolutely taken for granted in policy discussions of inflation control. Do we blame 'greed'? Of course not: firms are *supposed* to maximize their profits! #WhatsTheDiff /3
In this view the only way to stop firms from increasing prices more than costs is to take away purchasing power from people paying those prices: punishing the victims. Trying to *protect* the victims (with higher wages, benefits, subsidies) is then seen as 'causing' inflation. /4
Fine story by @MESandbu for @FT on sustained weakness of business capex across G7 and its consequences (paywall): ft.com/content/3a8731…. I've argued for yrs the greatest contradiction of neoliberalism is weakness of biz investmt, DESPITE the painful favours done for capital. /2
Profit shares are up strongly in most OECD countries thx to neoliberal policies (to suppress labour costs, cut corp tax, deregulate & privatize). Yet capital does less work, not more, measured by its contribution to GDP. This chart from 2nd edition of economicsforeveryone.ca. /3
Net investmt got even weaker after COVID (sometimes <0). Company tax cuts only throw good money after bad: they've had no effect on private capital spending. I analyzed the 🇨🇦 failure here: centreforfuturework.ca/2020/08/26/the…. And the 🇺🇸 failure here (pp74-90): paecon.net/PAEReview/issu…. /4
Ontario's plan to guarantee a 'minimum wage' of $15/hr for gig workers (but ONLY for time engaged on an assignment) will have ABSOLUTELY ZERO impact on the incomes of gig workers. Anyone who thinks it means something does not understand how the gig business model works #canlab…2
Gig workers spend a great deal of time (often OVER HALF) waiting for assigned fares/tasks, or traveling to central hubs. It's bad enough this unpaid time is excluded from this 'minimum wage'. Eg. if you spend half your work day waiting, then the 'min. wage' falls to $7.50 …3
Even worse is the impact of the endogeneity of labour supply in the platform model. Uber & co depend on enough workers signing on to keep a surplus pool of drivers available to meet demand. The cost of unpaid waiting time is part of the calculation drivers make in signing on…4
How do EMPLOYERS benefit from paid sick days? Let me count the ways (8): 1. Workers staying home when ill protects health of colleagues. 2. 'Presenteeism' (people coming to work when they can't actually do the job) costs billions. 3. It's a basic decent employment benefit that...
... will help employers retain workers and address their so-called labour 'shortage'. 4. Protecting public health by limiting spread of COVID (& other diseases) results in a stronger economy & higher sales. 5. It allows workers to treat illness faster & get better sooner. ...
6. It boosts the brand of employers, showing they're a company that respects its workers & the public. 7. Superior productivity of healthy workers reduces unit labour costs. 8. Employers who compel staff to work when ill are demonstrating highly dubious business acumen. ...