Rajasthan High Court acquits four men in 2008 Jaipur Serial Blasts Case, directs DGP to conduct enquiry against erring cops for making manipulations and fabrications during probe.
A division bench of Justice Pankaj Bhandari and Justice Sameer Jain acquitted Saif, Saifurrehman, Sarvar Azmi and Salman.
In a judgment passed today, the court also held that the investigating agency should be made responsible for “negligent, cursory and inefficient action.”
“.. Investigation was not fair and it appears that nefarious means were employed by the Investigating Agencies, material witnesses required to unfold the events were withheld and apparent manipulations and fabrications have been done during the investigation,” court said.
Court: It is also observed that the Investigating Agency lacked the required legal skills as they were not aware about the statutory pre-requisites and mandatory requirements.
Court: The approach of the Investigation Agency was plagued by insufficient legal knowledge, lack of proper training and insufficient expertise of investigation procedure, especially on issues like cyber crimes and even basic issues like admissibility of evidence.
Court: The failure on the part of the Investigation Agency has frustrated the case of the prosecution and the evidence so recorded is not fulfilling the chain of evidence.
Court: It is duty the police to secure and record the complete evidence, to investigate in a sincere manner, to identify the culprits/accused, frame charges and assist the prosecution. However, in the instant case, the investigation agency has utterly failed to do so.
“This Court has no hesitation to hold that the investigation was flawed, shoddy and there were lapses on the part of the investigation team,” the court said.
“Manish Sisodia Played Vital Role Behind Delhi Liquor Policy Scam, Payment Of
Advance Kickbacks Of Around Rs. 90-100 crores Was Meant For Him”: Delhi Court while denying bail to former Deputy CM.
In the bail order running into 34 pages, Special judge MK Nagpal has said that evidence not only shows Sisodia’s active participation in the criminal conspiracy, but also the prima facie commission of some substantive offences of the PC Act by him.
Court: There is also nothing apparent on record to infer or show that arrest was illegal or violative of any directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or Hon'ble High Courts and rather, the material placed before this court by the CBI justifies the arrest of applicant in the case.
Bombay High Court is hearing slain rationalist NARENDRA DABHOLKAR 's family's plea to continue monitoring the investigation and trial in the 2013 incident.
Bombay High Court is hearing a PIL against permission granted to MMRCL to cut 177 trees at Aarey Colony for the Metro project by "fraudulently claiming the trees are dead and dangerous."
‘Misuse’ of CM Disaster Relief Fund: #Kerala Lok Ayukta Refers Complaint Against Chief Minister @pinarayivijayan, Others To Full Bench After Difference Of Opinion
@pinarayivijayan@navya_benny The bench of Justice Cyriac Joseph and Justice Harun-ul-Rashid had difference of opinion over the basic issue that whether the action of the respondents can be subjected to investigation under Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, and on the merits of allegations.
@pinarayivijayan@navya_benny Under Section 7 (1) of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, where there is difference of opinion between the Lok Ayukta and the Upa-Lok Ayukta, the action shall be investigated by the Lok Ayukta and both the Upa-Lok Ayuktas together and the decision of the majority shall prevail.
Delhi Court to pronounce order on bail plea of AAP leader and former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia in CBI’s case alleging corruption relating to excise policy for the year 2021-22.
CBI had opposed Sisodia’s bail plea and submitted that granting bail to him will scuttle the investigation and that there has been a “constant practice” of destruction of evidence by him.
BOMBAY HIGH COURT is hearing bookie ANIL JAISINGHANI's plea to quash the FIR against him on a complaint by Amruta Fadnavis, wife of Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis.
Adv for Jaisinghani - I am a proclaimed offender.... Because the complaint is filed by the Dy CM and former CM of Maharashtra therefore the Advocate General had to appear in this case. Otherwise any prosecutor could have appeared.
Justice AS Gadkari - The prayer no. 1 is for quashing of FIR under PC Act we may not be able to entertain the petition in light of the Madhya Pradesh judgement.