It is Anushka's case that the assessing officer wrongly held that by endorsing products and anchoring she acquired copyrights or tangible goods, that are sold and transferred. She contended that the copyright always remains with the producer.
J Jamdar - Why don't you go in appeal?
What is the problem? We have held in a case that if there is even some level of factual enquiry required, then it should go in appeal.
Adv Deepak Bapat - It is my case that the order is without jurisdiction. So we need not go into the facts. I don't hold the copyright for the performances for which I am being charged.
Adv Bapat cites a judgement - In this case the issue was whether the senior artiste's performance would be protected by the Copyright Act. The court held it wasn't.
J Jamdar - You can argue all this in appeal. We are on a very narrow point whether this can be adjudicated in appeal or not. This will need adjudication of factual aspects. There are disputed questions.
J Jamdar - Do you want us to pass a detailed order or will you go in appeal?
"After arguments for sometime, the petitioner says she will avail of the alternate remeady provided under the statute. All contentions kept open. Appeal to be filed within two weeks. Pet. disposed"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Manish Sisodia Played Vital Role Behind Delhi Liquor Policy Scam, Payment Of
Advance Kickbacks Of Around Rs. 90-100 crores Was Meant For Him”: Delhi Court while denying bail to former Deputy CM.
In the bail order running into 34 pages, Special judge MK Nagpal has said that evidence not only shows Sisodia’s active participation in the criminal conspiracy, but also the prima facie commission of some substantive offences of the PC Act by him.
Court: There is also nothing apparent on record to infer or show that arrest was illegal or violative of any directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court or Hon'ble High Courts and rather, the material placed before this court by the CBI justifies the arrest of applicant in the case.
Bombay High Court is hearing slain rationalist NARENDRA DABHOLKAR 's family's plea to continue monitoring the investigation and trial in the 2013 incident.
Bombay High Court is hearing a PIL against permission granted to MMRCL to cut 177 trees at Aarey Colony for the Metro project by "fraudulently claiming the trees are dead and dangerous."
‘Misuse’ of CM Disaster Relief Fund: #Kerala Lok Ayukta Refers Complaint Against Chief Minister @pinarayivijayan, Others To Full Bench After Difference Of Opinion
@pinarayivijayan@navya_benny The bench of Justice Cyriac Joseph and Justice Harun-ul-Rashid had difference of opinion over the basic issue that whether the action of the respondents can be subjected to investigation under Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, and on the merits of allegations.
@pinarayivijayan@navya_benny Under Section 7 (1) of the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, where there is difference of opinion between the Lok Ayukta and the Upa-Lok Ayukta, the action shall be investigated by the Lok Ayukta and both the Upa-Lok Ayuktas together and the decision of the majority shall prevail.
Delhi Court to pronounce order on bail plea of AAP leader and former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi Manish Sisodia in CBI’s case alleging corruption relating to excise policy for the year 2021-22.
CBI had opposed Sisodia’s bail plea and submitted that granting bail to him will scuttle the investigation and that there has been a “constant practice” of destruction of evidence by him.
BOMBAY HIGH COURT is hearing bookie ANIL JAISINGHANI's plea to quash the FIR against him on a complaint by Amruta Fadnavis, wife of Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis.
Adv for Jaisinghani - I am a proclaimed offender.... Because the complaint is filed by the Dy CM and former CM of Maharashtra therefore the Advocate General had to appear in this case. Otherwise any prosecutor could have appeared.
Justice AS Gadkari - The prayer no. 1 is for quashing of FIR under PC Act we may not be able to entertain the petition in light of the Madhya Pradesh judgement.