There was also a fundamental incompatibility between #blockchain and the #GDPR but law & policymakers largely chose to ignore it (of course it didn't matter as much because the tech wasn't as consequential). medium.com/berkman-klein-…
In the case of #GenerativeAI, I suspect these decisions will be impossible to enforce because data supply chains are now so complex & disjointed that it's hard to maintain neat delineations between a "data subject, controller & processor" (@OpenAI might try to leverage this).
First, I'd start with the Harvard Ad Board who in 2003 gave Mark a pass for violating university IT policies, stealing photos from private house directories, hacking into the Crimson, and harassing women with his first project Facemash. thecrimson.com/article/2003/1…
Next, I'd look at Peter Thiel, Reid Hoffman, Marc Andreessen, and other early Facebook investors who overlooked Mark's character and FB's origin story, weren't very impressed with him, and decided to invest anyway. mashable.com/2017/11/10/mar…
1/9) Since everyone keeps asking me, here’s my TLDR on why blockchain-enabled immunity passports, certificates, or credentials for #COVID19 (ala the CCI covidcreds.com) are such a bad idea from a legal POV (leaving aside the technical & public health concerns for now).
2/9) Immunity passports, certificates, or credentials of any kind have the potential to interfere with fundamental rights of privacy & data protection; freedoms of association, assembly, & movement; the right to work & education; and otherwise limit our freedom & autonomy.
3/9) A measure that would interfere with our fundamental rights must be prescribed by law, necessary, and proportionate to achieve legitimate aims (bit.ly/2xDa6Sc).