Elizabeth M. Renieris Profile picture
Mar 31 4 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
This 🧵+ underlying decision really highlight the fundamental incompatibility between most #GenerativeAI tools & #GDPR style laws. That's obvious.

The real question is whether there's sufficient political will to acknowledge this truth given the commercial incentives around AI.
There was also a fundamental incompatibility between #blockchain and the #GDPR but law & policymakers largely chose to ignore it (of course it didn't matter as much because the tech wasn't as consequential). medium.com/berkman-klein-…
In the case of #GenerativeAI, I suspect these decisions will be impossible to enforce because data supply chains are now so complex & disjointed that it's hard to maintain neat delineations between a "data subject, controller & processor" (@OpenAI might try to leverage this).
For more on this topic, check out my recent book BEYOND DATA. mitpress.mit.edu/9780262047821/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth M. Renieris

Elizabeth M. Renieris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hackylawyER

Feb 18, 2021
Who made Mark Zuckerberg king 👑?

A thread . . .
First, I'd start with the Harvard Ad Board who in 2003 gave Mark a pass for violating university IT policies, stealing photos from private house directories, hacking into the Crimson, and harassing women with his first project Facemash. thecrimson.com/article/2003/1…
Next, I'd look at Peter Thiel, Reid Hoffman, Marc Andreessen, and other early Facebook investors who overlooked Mark's character and FB's origin story, weren't very impressed with him, and decided to invest anyway. mashable.com/2017/11/10/mar…
Read 7 tweets
May 6, 2020
1/9) Since everyone keeps asking me, here’s my TLDR on why blockchain-enabled immunity passports, certificates, or credentials for #COVID19 (ala the CCI covidcreds.com) are such a bad idea from a legal POV (leaving aside the technical & public health concerns for now).
2/9) Immunity passports, certificates, or credentials of any kind have the potential to interfere with fundamental rights of privacy & data protection; freedoms of association, assembly, & movement; the right to work & education; and otherwise limit our freedom & autonomy.
3/9) A measure that would interfere with our fundamental rights must be prescribed by law, necessary, and proportionate to achieve legitimate aims (bit.ly/2xDa6Sc).
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(