Apparently the show goes on. None of the #EpsteinClientList folks got indicted. Only Epstein & Maxwell were prosecuted. The pedophiles are still running the show as if nothing changed.
A SHOCKING REVELATION ABOUT JAMIE DIMON, CEO OF JP MORGAN.
Whitney Webb explains how the same powerful players who brought Jeffrey Epstein to prominence were primarily responsible for the rise of JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon.
Shame on the FBI
Shame on the DOJ
Shame on the US Government
The only secure document in Washington DC is the Epstein client list
Jeffrey Epstein was a fake billionaire set up by intelligence agencies. His private island functioned as a massive child sex trafficking ring that was used to collect blackmail on the global elite (billionaires, celebrities & politicians).
Breaking: Epstein & Maxwell were trafficking kids for no one
JP Morgan CEO’s top lieutenants reportedly made multiple trips to Epstein’s Manhattan home even after Epstein became a convicted sex offender. Jamie Dimon must have known about this for sure.
CIA's William Burns, Goldman's Kathryn Ruemmler, Noam Chomsky, a Kissinger consultant, a Rothschild, and others met with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in the years after his conviction. They’re all in on it. No wonder the #EpsteinClientList hasn’t been released out yet.
Now that more names are coming out in Epstein case, if they’re to arrest everyone involved with Jeffrey Epstein scandal… half of Washington DC, Hollywood, FBI and CIA would be in prison.
This NYPost front page sums it up, but not a single client has been outed or prosecuted. I’m sure they’re all safe.
“Jeffrey Epstein regularly visited…and was provided with a private office space at Harvard…in the program, ‘Evolutionary Dynamics’ in 2018…AFTER he was caught fucking underage girls…” -Joe Rogan
The ex CEO of JP Morgan’s Private Asset Management division has been exposed for facilitating and participating in Jeffrey Epsteins Child Trafficking operation in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
In a court filing, Jes Stanley, was accused of taking part in sexual abuse and “used… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Stephen Deckoff buys #EpsteinIsland for $60,000,000 to build a luxury resort for who?
Jeffrey Epstein’s meetings calendar 6 years after he was convicted of child trafficking and pedophilia.
Just in a day on 2014 he met
- Thomas Pritzker
- Bill Gates
- Leon Black
- Mortimer Zuckerman
- Kathryn Ruemmeler
…
A Phone Call Between Woody Allen And Mia Farrow.
Woody Allen, is accused by his ex-girlfriend, actress Mia Farrow, of sexually abusing their adopted daughter Dylan in August 1992 when she was 7.
America sure doesn’t want to be ruled by airheads, knuckleheads, chuckleheads and bone heads
🔥🔥The Tale of Four Heads 🔥🔥
Airhead floats with thoughts so light,
Dreaming in the broad daylight.
Lost in clouds, without a care,
Wanders here, then drifts elsewhere.
Bonehead’s dense, a stubborn sort,
Hard to crack, though full of naught.
Tried and tried to think things through,
But thinking’s not what boneheads do!
Chucklehead laughs loud and long,
Finds a joke in what’s all wrong.
Every mishap, every fall,
Is funny when you’re chuckle tall.
Knucklehead’s the one who fights,
Argues loud through days and nights.
Thinks with fists instead of brains,
Quick to anger, slow to gains.
Four heads wander through the town,
Causing grins and some a frown.
But together, day or night,
They keep life a little light!
Over the past 125 years, the U.S. government's approach to regulation has undergone significant transformations, reflecting changes.
Over-regulation and government expansion has become a significant issue these days. Some of the factors include:
🚩Expansion of Regulatory Scope: Initially, regulations were primarily focused on economic activities like interstate commerce, banking, and transportation. Over time, this scope expanded dramatically to include environmental protection, consumer safety, health care, telecommunications, and more. This shift was partly due to the recognition of externalities and public goods that the market might not address efficiently.
🚩Creation of Regulatory Agencies: The establishment of agencies like the Interstate Commerce Commission (1887), later followed by the Environmental Protection Agency (1970), and others, marked a trend towards specialized regulatory bodies. These agencies have grown in number and influence, with each often having a specific sector or issue to oversee.
🚩Environmental and Social Regulations: The latter half of the 20th century saw a surge in regulations aimed at protecting the environment and public health, with landmark legislation like the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and various amendments expanding federal authority into areas previously left to states or not regulated at all.
🚩Technological Influence: The rise of technology has both necessitated new regulations (like internet privacy, cybersecurity) and influenced how regulations are implemented (e.g., through digital reporting, electronic rule-making platforms). This has also led to debates over net neutrality and data protection, showcasing the government's struggle to keep pace with technological change.
The “Cobra Effect” refers to a situation where an attempted solution to a problem makes the problem worse, due to unintended consequences. The term comes from an anecdote set in colonial India, where the British government, concerned about the number of venomous cobras in Delhi, offered a bounty for every dead cobra. Initially, this seemed to work as people brought in dead cobras for the reward. However, enterprising individuals began to breed cobras for the sole purpose of collecting the bounty. When the government realized this and stopped the bounty program, the cobra breeders set their now-worthless snakes free, leading to a significant increase in the wild cobra population.
This story illustrates a common issue in incentive systems and policy-making:
1. Unintended Consequences:
Solutions can lead to behaviors that exacerbate the original problem.
2. Perverse Incentives:
When rewards are offered, people might find ways to exploit the system rather than solve the problem.
3. Short-term vs. Long-term Thinking:
Quick fixes might offer immediate relief but can lead to worse outcomes in the long run.
The Cobra Effect is often cited in economics, sociology, and public policy to caution against poorly designed incentives or policies without considering all possible outcomes. The lesson from the Cobra Effect is to carefully design systems, policies, or incentives with a thorough understanding of human behavior and potential loopholes that could be exploited.
Governments often designs policies with a narrow scope without understanding the wider implications for human behavior leading to significant waste of resources, time and money.