Apparently the show goes on. None of the #EpsteinClientList folks got indicted. Only Epstein & Maxwell were prosecuted. The pedophiles are still running the show as if nothing changed.
A SHOCKING REVELATION ABOUT JAMIE DIMON, CEO OF JP MORGAN.
Whitney Webb explains how the same powerful players who brought Jeffrey Epstein to prominence were primarily responsible for the rise of JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon.
Shame on the FBI
Shame on the DOJ
Shame on the US Government
The only secure document in Washington DC is the Epstein client list
Jeffrey Epstein was a fake billionaire set up by intelligence agencies. His private island functioned as a massive child sex trafficking ring that was used to collect blackmail on the global elite (billionaires, celebrities & politicians).
Breaking: Epstein & Maxwell were trafficking kids for no one
JP Morgan CEO’s top lieutenants reportedly made multiple trips to Epstein’s Manhattan home even after Epstein became a convicted sex offender. Jamie Dimon must have known about this for sure.
CIA's William Burns, Goldman's Kathryn Ruemmler, Noam Chomsky, a Kissinger consultant, a Rothschild, and others met with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in the years after his conviction. They’re all in on it. No wonder the #EpsteinClientList hasn’t been released out yet.
Now that more names are coming out in Epstein case, if they’re to arrest everyone involved with Jeffrey Epstein scandal… half of Washington DC, Hollywood, FBI and CIA would be in prison.
This NYPost front page sums it up, but not a single client has been outed or prosecuted. I’m sure they’re all safe.
“Jeffrey Epstein regularly visited…and was provided with a private office space at Harvard…in the program, ‘Evolutionary Dynamics’ in 2018…AFTER he was caught fucking underage girls…” -Joe Rogan
The ex CEO of JP Morgan’s Private Asset Management division has been exposed for facilitating and participating in Jeffrey Epsteins Child Trafficking operation in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
In a court filing, Jes Stanley, was accused of taking part in sexual abuse and “used… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Stephen Deckoff buys #EpsteinIsland for $60,000,000 to build a luxury resort for who?
Jeffrey Epstein’s meetings calendar 6 years after he was convicted of child trafficking and pedophilia.
Just in a day on 2014 he met
- Thomas Pritzker
- Bill Gates
- Leon Black
- Mortimer Zuckerman
- Kathryn Ruemmeler
…
A Phone Call Between Woody Allen And Mia Farrow.
Woody Allen, is accused by his ex-girlfriend, actress Mia Farrow, of sexually abusing their adopted daughter Dylan in August 1992 when she was 7.
Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.
Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.
A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇
Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.
In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.
In the shadowed annals of empire, the invasion of Iraq revealed the blueprint: invent an existential threat, amplify it through every megaphone of power, then unleash hell under the banner of salvation. Weapons of mass destruction—those ghostly specters that never materialized—served as the perfect phantom, terrifying enough to silence dissent yet vague enough to evade accountability when the lie collapsed. The true prize was never aluminum tubes or yellowcake; it was the second-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, waiting to be liberated from a dictator and delivered into the hands of Western corporations. The war was sold as a moral crusade, but the receipts came later in the form of no-bid contracts and decades of guaranteed crude flowing through friendly pipelines.
Venezuela now stands in the crosshairs of the same script, only the boogeyman has been rebranded for a new century. Where once we feared mushroom clouds, we are now instructed to tremble before weapons of mass intoxication—tons of cocaine allegedly funneled through Caracas by a regime painted as the kingpin of global narco-terrorism. The opioid crisis ravaging American towns becomes the emotional battering ram, the humanitarian catastrophe of Venezuelan migrants the moral veneer, while the real objective glitters beneath the Orinoco Belt: the largest oil reserves on the planet, currently outside the grip of ExxonMobil and Chevron. The pattern is identical—demonize, destabilize, invade or install a compliant regime—only this time the pretext is not yellowcake but white powder, and the war will be waged not with tanks rolling across the desert but with sanctions, proxy forces, and perhaps, when the moment is ripe, a "limited intervention" to stop the drugs and secure the wells. History does not repeat; it simply changes costumes.