Supreme Court hearing petition filed by Gujarat riots gangrape survivor, #BilkisBano challenging decision of Gujarat government to grant remission to 11 convicts who had gangraped her and murdered her family members during the 2002 Godhra riots
Justice Nagarathna: We are also concious of the strategy that matter may be dragged to atleast December by the accused. They will say not served and seek 4 weeks, next hearing another accused will say.
SC: When it comes to how the power (of remission) was exercised ...
Sr Adv Sidharth Luthra: 3 issues. Two sets of petitions. One by the victim herself which this Court is entitled to hear. There is a review. They have bypassed the curative process. Those are things to be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SC: The review is about who is the appropriate government. We are on the exercise of the power by the government.
Luthra: Consequence of curative being decided in their favour will be it does to the other govt. Now they are trying to also contest some findings by the two judges.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SC: if the other issues can be decided, then the (Article) 32 petition lies.
SC: Life is life, irrespective of how many years you were behind bars. It is only after the final 432 order comes that the issue is decided. Today it is her tomorrow it can be someone else. What is the problem in showing us (the files) today? You are in contempt for not producing… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sibal: They can produce the files in a sealed cover maybe.
ASG: Many documents require translation. Only seek time.
Adv Vrinda Grover: This is surprising. Gujarat govt has already replied.
SC: Crimes are generally committed against society, and the community. So when you give remission ... We are only going by Wednesbury (principle). You cannot compare the victim's plight with standard 302 (murder) cases. Unequals cannot be treated equally.
Order: By order dated 27.03.2023, this court issued notice on the writ petition. By said order we had also issued notice in all connected matters, we had impleaded the Union. Mr SV Raju appearing for Gujarat states that the Centre and State may be filing review of said order… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Order: Other respondents seek time to file counter affidavit.
#DelhiHighCourt to hear today a suit filed by Amitabh Bachchan's granddaughter, #AaradhyaBachchan, seeking directions to @YouTube and government to take down/block access to videos that violate her #privacy and tarnish Bachchan family name.
The suit argues that these videos make a fake claim that Aaradhya is in bad health. One of them even said she has passed away.
The videos further said that Bachchans did not take any steps to provide prompt medical attention to the child. #AmitabhBachchan#abhishekbachchan
The court has been told that Aaradhya and her family members’ images have been morphed and misused for disseminating false information and generating profits.
Central Government has in a fresh application urged the Constitution Bench that views of state governments are taken into account since "marriage" is in concurrent list
On April 18, the Department of Legal Affairs has also written to all Chief Secretaries of states to submit… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The list of lawyers who will argue for the petitioners in the case and the time they will take to make submissions #samesexmarriage#SupremeCourtofIndia
#SupremeCourt hears a plea by Ramoji Rao owned publication Eenadu seeking suspension of an Andhra Pradesh government order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by village and ward volunteers
CJI DY Chandrachud: We are planning to send this to Delhi HC
Sr Adv CS Vaidyanathan: this will cast an aspersion on the entire HC
CJI: See what weighed with us is that it is not just Eenadu vs Sakshi (2 newspaper giants) but it is between two political parties. It is clear
Sr Adv Niranjan Reddy: there should not be an impression that AP HC is not able to decide the case
CJI: In Delhi HC you all will have to just travel a Km and argue the case
CJI DY Chandrachud: You people think you can Supreme Court for a ride. You cannot overreach the court. Officer of MMRCL should also be sent to jail. Ask CEO of MMRCL to be present in court !
CJI: how can the superintendent allow the felling of tress when there was a stay by this court. We allowed you to move tree authority for 84 trees felling.. but then you move the authority to fell 185 trees and they give the permission !! Without seeking our permission? both… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SG Tushar Mehta: the authority had asked us to conduct a fresh survey since last was in 84'. court was in holiday and before we could approach they moved the court
CJI: But how did your client move the tree authority for anything above than 84 when we permitted the same