Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture
Apr 21, 2023 21 tweets 9 min read Read on X
1/Don’t let all your effort be in VEIN!

Developmental venous anomalies (DVAs) are often thought incidental but ignore them at your own risk!

A #tweetorial about how to know when DVAs are the most important finding

#meded #medtwitter #neurorad #neurotwitter #radtwitter #radres Image
2/DVAs aren’t hard to recognize on imaging—they have a typical “caput medusae” appearance.

Dilated medullary veins look like snakes all converging into the medusa head of a large draining vein. Image
3/DVAs are incredibly common—1 in 50 may have one

Although >90% are asymptomatic, that would still results in a relatively large number of patients w/symptoms

Also, w/increasing knowledge of DVA physiology, we may find they’re responsible for more symptoms than we realize Image
4/What causes a DVA to form? First you must understand normal venous drainage before you can understand its anomalies

Medullary veins drain the white matter & can either drain deep into subependymal veins or into superficial medullary veins & into the superficial venous system Image
5/DVAs form when normal drainage for a medullary vein doesn’t form or regresses.

The medullary veins from the opposite drainage system (either superficial or deep) swoop in like a super hero to try to save that territory, by taking over its drainage—and forming a DVA Image
6/Think of it like the morning after the party. Someone’s gotta clean up the mess & drain it away.

A DVA is what happens when the normal people responsible for cleaning up bail & some poor sucker is left cleaning up everything, even if it wasn’t his mess. Image
7/This is why DVAs always drain the opposite of what you would expect (ie, deep white matter drains superficial, superficial white matter drains deep) bc the normal drainage bailed on that white matter & a DVA was left to clean up an area that wasn’t even its mess. Image
8/But obviously having 1 person do all the cleaning when it was meant for multiple people is not efficient & can overwhelm the person doing the cleaning

Same w/DVAs—they can be overwhelmed & have venous hypertension. This causes gliosis/T2 signal around it & can cause headache Image
9/Venous hypertension can also affect neurological function in the region.

Poor venous drainage is like a bathtub that doesn’t drain well—stagnant water isn’t going to clean you well.

Same w/venous hypertension—region isn’t going to function well, w/hypometabolism on PET Image
10/DVAs are not prepared to handle the extra flow. Remember, the draining stem was only expecting to handle drainage from its own medullary vein.

Making it responsible for medullary veins that should have been drained elsewhere is like turning the faucet on high Image
11/This increased flow impacts the DVA itself. It results in more pressure on the wall of the vein, resulting wall damage & thickening.

This wall damage/thickening makes DVAs more susceptible to stenoses, slow flow, & occlusions than normal veins Image
12/Increased wall pressure is like the wall receiving a punch

So you can imagine if you are punched over & over, that might make it so you don’t want to let people in—and you might close off entirely! No wonder these may thrombose! Image
13/DVAs are also associated w/cerebral cavernous malformations or CCMs.

CCMs & DVAs go together like peas & carrots—as many as 1/3rd of CCMs have DVAs.

CCMs are prone to bleed. Many bleeds previously thought from DVAs were from associated CCMs. Why is there an association? Image
14/There are two theories.

First, is the hemodynamic theory.

CCM is actually a response to the parenchymal injury that comes from chronic venous hypertension & the DVA not being able to carry its flow. This results in release of angiogenetic factors as a response to injury Image
15/Like a new baby, new vessels formed are more easily injured & then bleed

Bleeds result in more repair—like a baby crying results in parents fixing what's wrong

This spoils a baby, who's more likely to cry again. More new/weak vessels means CCM is more likely to bleed again Image
16/Second theory is the two genetic hit theory.

Mutations in the PIK3CA gene can cause DVA formation.

But like having a drink before a fight—the mutation also makes you vulnerable to a second hit.

A 2nd mutation of another gene combined w/PIK3CA can cause a CCM to form Image
17/DVAs can also cause symptoms from mass effect.

DVAs can become large bc they drain a large territory.

B/c they are large, they can cause mass effect on the brain, cranial nerves, or even the ventricular system & cause hydrocephalus Image
18/When you’re overwhelmed & trying to clean up everything as fast as possible, you can accidentally pick up things that aren’t even trash & don’t need you to pick them up.

Same w/DVAs. They can pick up arterial flow & have microshunts or even AVMs—increasing risk of bleeding Image
19/DVAs are also associated w/seizures—from CCMs & cortical malformations (also associated w/DVAs). It’s unclear if the association is b/c PIK3CA also predisposes to cortical malformations, or if normal venous architecture is important scaffolding to guide cortical development Image
20/So before you write off a DVA as incidental, look for signs that it could be symptomatic, such as signs of venous hypertension (gliosis, stenosis, or microshunt) or for associated lesions such as CCMs or cortical malformations Image
21/Remember, they’re not INCIDENTAL Venous Anomalies—they represent true pathology & you should be sure they don’t have abnormalities that may make them symptomatic before you write them off.

Remember, it’s always incidental to you if you don’t understand its significance! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lea Alhilali, MD

Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @teachplaygrub

Apr 16
1/ Need a global perspective on dementia?

Do you know the global cortical atrophy (GCA) score for evaluating dementia patients—or are you still gestalting volume loss???

Don’t estimate when you can calculate!

Here’s a thread of what you need to know about the GCA score! Image
2/The global cortical atrophy score calculates cortical volume loss on a scale of 0-3 in 13 different regions & ventricular dilatation

Gyri shrink down w/atrophy, the same way your cheeks shrink down with aging! Image
3/Gyri look like lips with around a mouth of sulcal space.

Without volume loss, the gyri look like big fat pursed model lips

But w/volume loss they open up like the scream w/thinning of the lips Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 14
1/Wish that your knowledge of autoimmune encephalitis was automatic?

Do you feel in limbo about limbic encephalitis?

Do you know the patterns?

Read on for what you need to know in this month's @RadioGraphics review!



@cookyscan1 @RadG_Editor doi.org/10.1148/rg.240…Image
@RadioGraphics @cookyscan1 @RadG_Editor 2/Two pearls:
(1) Most common pattern is limbic encephalitis
(2) Small cell can cause any autoimmune pattern.

You can remember the causes by the demographic:
Young man: testicular
Older: Small cell
Woman with psychiatric symptoms (limbic): breast Image
@RadioGraphics @cookyscan1 @RadG_Editor 3/Limbic encephalitis is the most common pattern

But it has many, many different causes

Remember--limbic involvement is shaped like a question mark!

So for limbic encephalitis, the cause remains a question bc differential is so broad

Must question & clinically correlate! Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 2
1/One important aspect to stroke care is well, ASPECTS.

It’s a simple score system—but it’s important to understand all aspects!

Read on for the latest research on ASPECTS in this month’s @theAJNR SCANtastic!

ajnr.org/content/46/3/5…Image
2/ASPECTS stands for “Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score.”

It’s meant to replace gestalt-ing what percent of the MCA territory is infarcted.

Instead, it uses a 10-pt score to semi-quantitate the infarcted tissue in the MCA territory on non-contrast head CT Image
3/You can think of it as a score card for the MCA.

For each region of MCA territory NOT infarcted, the pt gets one point—for a highest score of 10, and lowest score of 0 Image
Read 18 tweets
Mar 21
1/Don't fall for the siren song of calling all bright round objects at foramen of Monro colloid cysts.

Like a true siren song, this may be a TRAP!

If you hear the call of colloid—read this first!

Here's a thread about lesions here that can trap you--& how you can avoid them! Image
2/Here are 3 lesions, all round and bright and in the region of the foramen of Monro.

Can you tell from the images which is a colloid cyst and which may be something else?

Choose which one or ones you think are a colloid cyst! Image
3/In this case it was A!

B was a tortuous basilar

C was a cavernoma of the chiasm/hypothalamus that had bled and projected into the third ventricle. Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 16
1/Remembering spinal fracture classifications is back breaking work!

A thread to review the scoring system for thoracic & lumbar fractures—“TLICS” to the cool kids! Image
2/TLICS scores a fx on (1) morphology & (2) posterior ligamentous complex injury

Let's start w/morphology

TLICS scores severity like the steps to make & eat a pizza:

Mild compression (kneading), strong compression (rolling), rotation (tossing), & distraction (tearing in) Image
3/At the most mild, w/only mild axial loading, you get the simplest fx, a compression fx—like a simple long bone fx--worth 1 pt.

This is like when you just start to kneading the dough. There's pressure, but not as much as with a rolling pin! Image
Read 13 tweets
Mar 14
1/The 90s called & wants its carotid imaging back!

It’s been 30 years--why are you still just quoting NASCET?

Do you feel vulnerable when it comes to identifying plaque vulnerability?

Here’s a thread to help you identify high risk plaques with carotid plaque imaging Image
2/Everyone knows the NASCET criteria:

If the patient is symptomatic & the greatest stenosis from the plaque is >70% of the diameter of normal distal lumen, patient will likely benefit from carotid endarterectomy.

But that doesn’t mean the remaining patients are just fine! Image
3/Yes, carotid plaques resulting in high grade stenosis are high risk.

But assuming that stenosis is the only mechanism by which a carotid plaque is high risk is like assuming that the only way to kill someone is by strangulation. Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(