Thread by @AVSmartz

@DrJBhattacharya if by "oddly fitting," you mean #CriminalBehavior then yes. But it is just as oddly fitting that those who decry #MassFormationPsychosis are in fact the primary subjects of #InstitutionalIndoctrination. They are #PavlovsDogs unaware they represent #FaucisHumans.

https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1650745418337378309

That is not meant as an insult, but rather an invitation to self reflect, somethng that for 3 years now those who should be open to new ideas and self-reflection cannot bring themselves to do. So while others have their delusions about misinformation, you too have some issues you

refuse to even entertain as a possibility. And your response is oddly fitting in that it is exactly what they do and what Fauci has done, refuse to even acknowledge the invitation to have an open and public conversation about the possibilities. That is called denial and avoidance

behaviors. Something unbecoming of a supposed professional who has the audacity to point the finger and accuse others of a behavior he himself mirrors when the need suits him. And our #GoodDoctors ALL do this on a macro scale. If not, you would gladly point out the fallacy of my

claim. I suspect you know you can't so you convince yourself you are RIGHT and therefore taking the high road. That is a sad commentary on your state of mind doctor. I am not someone to fear or disrespect, but you have convinced yourself that your staus elevates you to the point

a response is not warranted. Like you, with the other misinformation doctors, I just wish you were forced to have to respond. I suspect you know you can't for all the resons outlined above. So let me end on this admission by one of your own, one @RWMaloneMD and say that this

applies to ALL of our supposedly #GoodDoctors.

The truth hurts, but that doesn't make it any less true just because an entire industry denies it.

So @DrJBhattacharya is what I have suggested here also possible?

And if so, could we have that conversation, even if offline and in private, confidentially?