Post

@threadreaderapp

More from @warriors_mom

CyberChick

@warriors_mom

Jun 19

HUGE WIN!
Supreme Court Sides With Energy Production in Latest NEPA Ruling: NEPA has become infamous for its role as a blockade to development in the United States. Signed into law on January 1, 1970, at fewer than six pages, NEPA’s original intent was to inform the public on the environmental impact of large projects through the publication of environmental reviews, called environmental impact statements. Over time, however, what began as a procedural safeguard has morphed into a burdensome processthat serves to stop projects through endless public commentary, hearings, bureaucratic delays, and legal challenges.
Source below 👇🏼

Source: instituteforenergyresearch.org/regulation/sup…

While there has been endless talk in Washington over the years about the need to reform NEPA, the Trump administration is taking decisive action. In response to the D.C. Circuit Court case Marin Audubon Society v. Federal Aviation Administration, which found that the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) lacks the statutory authority to issue binding rules on federal agencies, President Trump withdrew all CEQ NEPA guidance issued since 1977. These guidelines forced federal agencies to incorporate analyses — such as the consideration of climate impacts and environmental justice (added under the Biden administration) — into environmental reviews. These guidelines were not derived from the text of NEPA but had been added and modified over the decades to respond to judicial activism as well as the changing policy preferences of presidential administrations.
Congress has also recently made small efforts to address NEPA delays, passing a 2023 law limiting the page count and setting deadlines for environmental reviews. However, these were simply added on top of existing CEQ regulations and court precedents. While well intended, these changes fail to address the core issues with NEPA.

Read 9 tweets

CyberChick

@warriors_mom

Jun 19

FDA halts new clinical trials seeking to send American cells to hostile labs for genetic engineering: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday halted and ordered a review of all new clinical trials that includes sending American cells to hostile nations for genetic engineering purposes.
Source below 👇🏼

Source: justthenews.com/government/fed…

The order comes after the Biden administration finalized a data security rule last year that included allowing U.S. companies to send cells and other biological samples of Americans to other countries for processing as part of the FDA's clinical trials.
(Now you know why 23 & Me sold!)

Read 7 tweets

CyberChick

@warriors_mom

Apr 17

He Died So Close to Jesus—and Almost Missed Him: There’s a moment in *Heaven, How I Got Here* that absolutely guts you.
It’s the moment when the thief realizes how close he came to missing everything.
He was right there. Just a few feet from the Savior of the world. He could hear Him breathe. He could see the blood. He could listen to every word Jesus spoke.
✝️✝️✝️ Easter

Source: townhall.com/columnists/kev…

And still—he almost missed Him.
Colin Smith brings that realization to life in gut-punching detail. He lets the thief narrate his own remorse—not about his crimes, but about how long he spent mocking the very One who came to save him.
See, at first, both criminals were railing at Jesus. It wasn’t just the crowd. It wasn’t just the soldiers. It was both men hanging beside Him.
He joined in.
He mocked the only One who could help him.
And he almost ran out of time.

Read 10 tweets

CyberChick

@warriors_mom

Apr 1

Sen. Chuck Grassley Introduces 'Judicial Relief Clarification Act' To Rein In Activist Judges!

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) introduced a proposal Monday to rein in judicial injunctions like the ones currently hampering President Donald Trump’s popular MAGA agenda.

Source: zerohedge.com/political/sen-…

The Judicial Relief Clarification Act of 2025 (JRCA) would “limit federal court orders to parties directly before the court, ending the practice of universal injunctions,” according to a Judiciary Committee Majority press release. The bill also aims to clarify the constitutional role of the judicial branch.

Read 10 tweets

CyberChick

@warriors_mom

Mar 23

Dear @elonmusk ,
This is why the Left needs to hate you:
“Rules for Radicals has various themes. Among them is his use of symbol construction to strengthen the unity within an organization.
He would draw on loyalty to a particular church or religious affiliation to create a structured organization with which to operate, the reason being that symbols by which communities could identify themselves created structured organizations that were easier to mobilize in implementing direct action. Once the community was united behind a common symbol, Alinsky would find a common enemy for the community to be united against.
The use of common enemy against a community was another theme of Rules for Radicals, as a uniting element in communities.
Alinsky would find an external antagonist to turn into a "common enemy" for the community within which he was operating. Often, this would be a local politician or agency that had some involvement with activity concerning the community. Once the enemy was established, the community would come together in opposition of it. This management of conflict heightened awareness within the community as to the similarities its members shared as well as what differentiated them from those outside of their organization.
The use of conflict also allowed for the goal of the group to be clearly defined. With an established external antagonist, the community's goal would be to defeat that enemy.”

I highly recommend this book against Alinsky’s psychological tactics:
Jeff Hedgpeth - Rules For Radicals Defeated. 👈🏼
Recognize, defend against, & successfully defeat the Progressive assault against Truth.

Jeff Hedgpeth’s book is a MUST READ

goodreads.com/book/show/1892…

Read 5 tweets

CyberChick

@warriors_mom

Mar 22

The most dangerous men (and women) in America, at least where our liberty is concerned, may be wearing black robes and presiding over our courtrooms. Yes, I’m talking about judges at all levels, but particularly Federal Judges, who are appointed for life terms.
A classic example of those is Judge James Boasberg, who is Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. I suggest you do a little research on this man. Although originally nominated to the federal bench by George W. Bush, he is anything but Republican-leaning in his decisions.

Source: alfrancis.substack.com/p/the-most-dan…

Appointed to the “FISA” court by SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts, he later was the judge who presided over the trials and sentencing of many of the J-6 defendants. His rulings and sentencing were, to say the least, brutal. Except for Ray Epps, that is, the FBI informant who was recorded on video exhorting a crowd to “Go INSIDE the Capitol Building” while people around him shouted “FED, FED!” Epps was sentenced to a slap on the wrist, one year of probation, and no jail time. Now, Boasberg is engaged in a legal embroglio with President Trump and his attempts to deport some of the most dangerous illegal aliens in our country, members of the Tren de Aragua gang from Venezuela.
Unbelievably, Boasberg is maintaining that Trump, through I.C.E. and the Department of Homeland Security, had no right to send them to El Salvadore, whose government agreed to place them in a maximum security prison there, after Venezuela refused to accept them back into their home country.

Read 7 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

CyberChick

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @warriors_mom

CyberChick

CyberChick

CyberChick

CyberChick

CyberChick

CyberChick

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!