The Division Bench of Justice N. Nagaresh and Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. shall soon consider the plea. #KeralaHighCourt #TheKeralaStory
The matter has been taken up.
Advocate Kaleeswaram Raj is appearing on behalf of the petitioner. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Bench: Did you approach anybody in this regard or are you directly appearing before this Court?
Adv. Raj: Movie is about to be released on the 5th. There is not even a breathing time to approach anybody else in this matter. We are taken aback. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: I don't seek a ban of the movie as such, that is not the prayer. The CBFC initially noted 10 cuts required, and thereafter, I would say much greater scrutiny was required on the part of the Central Board. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: In this film they say that it is not fiction, but essentially facts which is told in the form of fiction. That is how they say. It is not my sentence, it is their introduction to the story. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: They say that it is inspired by many true stories, which will give an indication that in Kerala, massive conversions are taking place. This is something which diminishes the dignity of the State and people as a whole. It is an insult. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Bench: Have you seen the cinema?
Adv. Raj: As of now in public sphere, only teaser is available. So for the time being, that alone can be looked into. We can only prevent it at this time. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Bench: I don't know what is so big about this. After all, it is a story.
Adv. Raj: What I am saying is that it is only recently that Apex Court discussed what is hate speech. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: Your Lordships collegiality on the Bench, the entire State is also having it, in the classrooms, etc. That is Kerala. This is not Kerala. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Bench: This is a piece of art, Mister. You cannot mix it with hate speech.
Adv. Raj: If this Court feels this is not hate speech, nothing else would be. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Bench: Are we giving it more publicity?
Adv. Raj: It is not, Your Lordship, publicity will happen even otherwise. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: What I am saying this, it would have to be tested on the context of constitutional morality. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: Here is a situation where the Board is abetting.
Bench: Kaleewaram, you have not seen the film, you have not seen the content of it, you have only seen a teaser and blaming the Central Board. We cannot take that luxury. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: The teaser is a part of the film. I underline that. The teaser is inseparable from the film. Therefore, it cannot be said that someone has not seen the film. I have approached the Court at the earliest moment. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Bench: Was a similar matter moved before the Supreme Court?
Adv. Raj: Let me explain that. What has happened in SC is that in another matter, one IA was moved and Court said two things. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: One was that you cannot move it by way of incidental proceeding as an incidental IA in a proceeding related to something else. Secondly, the Supreme Court said that the High Court would have to be approached. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: That cannot be an impediment in any way in considering this properly constituted writ petition. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: SC observed only today. We have moved even before that. We have satisfied the requirements orally suggested by the SC. This is not an IA but properly constituted writ. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: Were there any orders passed in this IA?
Adv. Raj: I assure that absolutely none was passed. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: What has happened in the SC is that, they are hearing of batch of writ petitions regarding hate speech. According to Live Law, the matter was heard in the morning. My plea was filed before that. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Justice Nagaresh: If the matter is pending consideration before SC, we don't want to interfere. You tell us what transpired before the SC. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Ameet Naik appearing on behalf of two respondents makes his submissions.
Adv. Naik: The Censor Board, after applying its mind granted the certificate. It was granted on 24th April. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Advocate Thomas P. Kuruvilla appearing for the producer Sunshine Pictures also makes his submissions. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: We do not have a law and order case. The certification was granted by a partial examination and non application of mind. Certification is an administrative decision making process. Why is there non-application of mind? #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Raj: Teaser is available even now. If this is the teaser, if certificate is granted to it, the certificate is available. If it is not granted, the exhibition of the teaser is illegal. This is my submission. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Adv. Rajesh submits that he has also filed a writ petition. But adds that it has not been numbered.
Bench: It will come on 5th. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
Matter has been posted for further consideration on May 5, 2023. Court asks respondents to file the response by the said date. #KeralaHighCourt#TheKeralaStory
#SupremeCourt to hear today Women Wrestlers' plea alleging sexual harrasment by BJP MP and Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
SG Mehta: Your lordships had passed an order for security on the last occasion. Sum and substance is para 4-
"Proper security has been provided to Minor in Rohtak..."
[Mass Religious Conversion case against SHUATS VC in #SupremeCourt.
Sr Adv Dushyant Dave: They were just meeting...Because S 4 is attracted, 3 other persons who are witnesses in first FIRs filed new FIRs. 2 people are in jail since Oct 2022. 3 since 2023.
#SupremeCourt to deliver its verdict in an SLP against decision of Calcutta HC to set aside an order by a CJM dismissing an application seeking FIR against BJP leader Kailash Vijayvargiya, RSS member Jisnu Basu, and Pradeep Joshi in a rape case.
Shah J: ...We remit the matter to the magistrate again to examine & apply judicial mind and exercise discretion whether to issue directions under S 156(3) or whether he can take cognisance & follow procedure u/ S 202, CrPC.
Merely because relaxation in criteria of minimum 75% marks in 12th Std. was granted in the previous 3 admission processes, the same would not entitle the students to continue to claim relaxation indefinitely: #BombayHighCourt
It would not be possible for this court to sit in judgment over the decision of the National Testing Agency in prescribing the eligibility criteria for admissions to NITs, IITs and CFITs: #BombayHighCourt
Grover: It is pending before the Kerala HC. However, the Kerala HC has listed it for 5th May which is the date for the release.
CJI DY Chandrachud: Ms Grover, you're asking for ban on screening?
Grover: No, we're asking for proportionate remedy.
Grover: The opening shot says the film is true. It has been advertised as a true story. That movie vilifies the entire community. There is no disclaimer. It's a pan India release.
Bench: The High Court has not considered various aspects that were before us. In our view, the High Court ought not to have granted interim stay when it was not required as the entire matter was at a premature stage.
Judgement
Bench: For the reasons stated above, we are inclined to set aside the order in IA number so and so while making it clear that we have not expressed anything on the merits of the case.