#BREAKING SG: Issue was some genuine human concerns and discussion was if something can be done administratively. Govt is positive. This would need coordination by different ministries. A committee headed by cabinet secretary will be formed and suggestions given by the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: The petitioners can submit suggestions between today and next hearing so that they can apply their mind as well to it #SupremeCourtofIndia
CJI: What we can also do is.. Both AG, you yourself, Ms Bhati can meet with petitioner lawyers.. can frame issues..
SG: We will host them yes.. but we would not have ready solutions..it is with the govt
SG: Sometimes change of law will need recognition of a relationship and that we will have to see
CJI: SG accepts that people have right to cohabit and it is a social reality and based on that there may be some incidents like right to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Guruswamy: for something as pension, insurance etc only accrues in a marriage not in the relationship of a caregiver..
SG: If govt says that nomination for PF could be for the spouse or anyone else nominated by the individual
Singhvi: we are happy to divide it and this will be a low hanging fruit and everyone will be happy.. but the higher fruit will be your order
CJI: The conceptual domain requires legislative changes and it is completely beyond our domain. So we have to see how we frame the conceptual doctrine. Somethings can be done administratively, something can be changed by subordinate legislation, and the third is recognition for… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Bhat: as you said this case is part of a series. So suppose there is a gain in this case.. you have to say do you want to build upon this for future course of action .. etc..
Sr Adv Saurabh Kirpal: the consensus between the community is that they want to get married..… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Kirpal: we understand we cannot get everything.. we can submit a draft on what can be given.. how section 4 recognition of marriage can be given... and rights that flow..
CJI DY Chandrachud: as a constitutional court we have an issue... if we go by what young people feel as constitutional court then we have to go by what others feel.. that is why we have to go with what constitution is and what is constitutional morality.. if we entertain this… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice R Bhat: just think of what will you get if the discussion move aheads.. there will be some quietus now and your battle for the equality will always remain.. but this will not the end of the road.. we are not prejudging it. #SupremeCourtofIndia
SG reads a note before the bench: statutory law of any country does not regulate all human relationships.. sans legitimate state interest.. legislation have kept full host of human relationships out of state purview as state has no business to recognising such relationship unless… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SG: Suppose someone garlands each other in a marriage.. they are married. but can they have a right that legislature recognises this marriage as well. they cannot. #surpremecourt
CJI: Conceptually there is difficulty in accepting this.. they are saying that by not recognising same sex marriage, the govt is acting in a discriminatory way and thus there is discrimination theory here
SG: Today Mr Sibal is a little under the weather. Please pardon his absence
AG: Howsoever enlightened we are on the subject and howesoever neutral we are..if we want practical outcomes.. how does the court decide a case like this... the court should not fundamentally alter the basic text of the statute in this case.. and see if a solution can be arrived… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
AG: special marriage act is only a law in relation to the institution of marriage and does not create the institution of marriage itself.. thus it is not a discriminatory legislation
CJI: you have SMA was supposed to be special law for heterosexual form of relationships and that same sex law was never intended to be a part of this and that this will lead to a host of legislative changes #samesexmarriage
AG: a hidden provision cannot be retrieved if it was never present there and similarly there is no question of same sex relation under special marriage act... it has to be looked at from this prism... something can be read into a statute only if there was ever an intention to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi: these are omnibus petitions seeking to equate all these relationships with heterosexual marriages and make drastic amendments to the Special marriage act. Now question is there a fundamental right to marriage.. fundamental right to recognition of marriage… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: How is dignity of the heterosexual marriage at stake?
Justice Bhat: you are saying using the word spouse diminishes the meaning of husband and wife
Dwivedi: we say I take you as a husband and take you as a wife... how can we say i take you as my spouse
CJI: When I say take you as my spouse...it means i take you as my spouse who is my wife...
Dwivedi: that is the not the essence
Justice Narasimha: what is the essence?
Dwivedi: while granting dignity you cannot inflict indignity... the act was made for an union between… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI : The existence of same couple has not been imported from somewhere else and it is a part of the society...
Dwivedi: they were there.. they had dignity and respect.. but they never demanded marriage.. marriage is not about dignity... people who are widows etc are not that… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Dwivedi: this is a case which requires social accomodation and the parliament is in the position to decide how to take the step, when to take the next step and what is the road ahead. whole social fabric will break apart if things are thrusted upon by this court. we have to take… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Dwivedi: one argument was a person can choose their role.. by adjudication will this court create new offences... what happens to article 20 that offence cam be created only by law.. so there is no way man and wife is substituted with spouse. and there is no way to do that
CJI: Suppose there is a same sex couple and they are in a relationship and they marry a person from another sex. Like 2 men in a relationship and one of them marries a woman then there will be no bigamy. This will be applicable to a trans person as well.. #samesexmarriage
CJI: so you say to take care of myriad situations the parliament must deal with it.. we get it
Dwivedi: this adjudication is happening without states my lord... #Supremecourtofindia
Sr Adv Dwivedi: pouring legislative intent at the mere asking will be doing something which Justice Cardozo had warned us against.. #samesexmarriage
Sr Adv Dwivedi: heterosexuals will not object will special marriage is struck down.. our marriage does not depend on it..
Justice Bhat: but what about people of different faith..
The Kerala High Court will shortly hear six petitions challenging the release of the movie 'The Kerala Story'. The case will be heard by a division bench of Justices N Nagaresh and Sophy Thomas.
#SupremeCourt hears the case of a journalist who was given Talaq e Hasan (triple divorce with gap period) by her advocate husband
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: the husband was asked to be present here and now an affidavit has been filed which has all facts which should be struck off the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: But has she been given talaq or not. if she has been given.. she can challenge it.. PIL or not..what is the basis of the challenge?
Sr Adv Divan: this is basically a Article 226 plea which has her issues as well.. it could be a PIL since she has a personal interest as… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: We will not go into matrimonial disputes here... we are on the challenge to extra judicial divorces.. like talaq e Hasan etc... so you have to withdraw the affidavit with individual facts
#SupremeCourt hears a PIL filed in connection with the current blockade and quit notice imposed or served by the Southern Angami Public Organisation (SAPO) of Nagaland on the Mao Community of Manipur
SG Tushar Mehta: I have received a note from Union Home Ministry. Some people were creating blockades etc.. but that has been withdrawn now... and there is no hindrance of movement at all.
CJI: We thought this is a matter of public order.. govt has said this and if there is any… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Narasimha: the initial problem was Mao people travelling through Kojeri forest... and now MHA says it is resolved but after this also if the problem persists then you can move MHA with individual concerns
#SupremeCourt is hearing the case where it had directed officials of legal services authorities in UP to collate information from district and state prisons on convicts who have become eligible for premature release
Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal: DGP UP may ensure that all details of life convicts in state prisons is filled in online portal, and details entered into software, all details of eligible life convicts be sent to prison authorities and reflects on e prison module #supremecourt
Justice Narasimha: we have to first identify who will take charge of this duty...as in the key officer in charge
Amicus: District Magistrate is the final authority who has the prison report, trial court report and then he makes a decision whether if he is released he or she will… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…