Because we used the word zealotry in the #DublinDeclaration, some people think we're overstating the issue. Here's @nyuniversity's "Toolkit for Local Policymakers" advocating taxes & bans on animal foods. Up to you to judge whether that's zealotry or not. s18798.pcdn.co/ceap/wp-conten…
BANS - do not rely on consumer behaviour - force them into compliance and stigmatize the dissidents.
Very similar to the language in the EAT-Lancet report: don't leave it to the "individual or the whim of consumer choice". thelancet.com/journals/lance…
The idea is to work via "cities" rather than nation-wide, because they are a "fertile ground for [.] progressive policy ideas, often stepping in front of their states and the federal government"
Which brings us to the @c40cities network for a reason...
Several mayors of global cities within C40Cities have pledged to achieve the targets of the EAT-Lancet diet by 2030 - the ambitious target being zero meat/dairy.
Interestingly, the current rhetorical technique of anti-livestock activists seems to be to accuse the #DublinDeclaration of its own pro-livestock "zealotry". Or worse, biased profit-seeking.
Everyone can make up its mind on what & whom to believe...
... but the Declaration hasn't been written to give a free ticket to the livestock sector-far from it. It wishes to correct a narrative that has become unhinged. You can either dismiss it or value it, but please do it based on what's actually in the text. dublin-declaration.org
And ask yourself the question if these thousand signatures are really just a greenwashing attempt by corrupt scientists, or if there may be a genuine concern within a scientific community who's voice has been overshouted by a crusading minority... dublin-declaration.org/signatures
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"We’re all speaking in this newspeak of percentages & abstractions in an attempt to validate our worldview & obfuscate our complicity in the mess we’re all in. No one can seem to agree on the numbers, yet without wielding them, our worldview is considered backwards & ignorant"
"I believe our collective hyper-fixation on carbon as the-root-of-all-evil is a dangerous obfuscation that distracts us from dealing with the ecological crisis & I believe we fixate on it because we can measure it" twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"Close to a thousand experts unite behind statement that rejects ‘zealotry’ of plant-based diets and promotes livestock farming": the #DublinDeclaration on the Societal Role of Livestock telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/04/2…
More info in this overview thread: all of the evidence underpinning the "#DublinDeclaration of Scientists on the Societal Role of Livestock" can be accessed through Open Access, as well as the Declaration itself:
“When I am asked by a concerned citizen about those ‘wretched’ #cows and whatever else, I say, 'well hold on, before you criticise my cows [..]: we are the custodians of the nation’s #carbon. How much carbon do you manage?' And there is a silence" theirishtimesnewstoday.com/what-can-we-le…
“if we were to convert the whole farm into multispecies swards [we] could be net zero today without adjusting stocking density [but while] cattle &sheep production can be beyond carbon neutral, current policy frameworks in Europe only measure what farms emit, not what they store"
"measurements of tonnes of carbon per hectare on Dowth show that hedges have 50% greater carbon density than woodlands [..] the hedgerows on Dowth are sequestering roughly 665 tonnes a year [..] But at the moment, Irish hedge rows are not in the national inventory"
This Special Issue of Animal Frontiers was written by a stellar interdisciplinary consortium of experts, to summarize the evidence on the societal impact of #meat. We hope that it may serve as a reference for future discussions on this vital topic.
As stated in our editorial (with co-guest editor @ederer_peer) "our request of the authors was not to reflect on the most granular levels of current scientific argumentation [but] to derive what can be robustly learned & has most societal significance" 2/n academic.oup.com/af/article/13/…
The publication is a formalized scientific follow-up of the International Summit on the Societal Role of Meat, hosted by @teagasc in 2022, featuring various authors of the Special Issue. The Dublin presentations can be viewed here: teagasc.ie/food/research-… 3/n
Aspects of human anatomy, digestion, & metabolism diverged from other primates, indicating evolutionary reliance on, & compatibility with, substantial meat intake. Implications of a disconnect from evolutionary dietary patterns may contribute to today’s burden of disease.
2/n
Meat supplies high-quality protein & various nutrients, some of which are not always easily obtained with meat-free diets & are often already suboptimal or deficient in global populations.
3/n
"Non-communicable disease risk associated with red and processed meat consumption—magnitude, certainty, and contextuality of risk?"
🧵1/n academic.oup.com/af/article/13/…
Mean global intakes per person of red and processed meats are 51 & 17 g/day respectively. Consumption is lowest in South Asia (7 & 3 g/d), and highest in Central Europe/Asia (114 & 54 g/d).
2/n
While some researchers claim that red & processed meat consumption is intrinsically harmful, the evidence does not support this being the case where intakes are below 75 & 20 g/d, respectively.
3/n