The Karnataka High Court will soon hear a PIL calling for a stay on the two road shows by Prime Minister Narendra Modi set to be conducted in Bengaluru this weekend.
The PIL seeks the interim relief in a plea claiming that Karnataka's people are suffering from traffic jams for the past week created by several political parties under the guise of road shows.
Court asks how heightened emotions at the road show will handled by the State.
Bengaluru Commissioner of Police responds with security details including screening of visitors, barricading to prevent stampede, traffic diversions etc.
Commissioner: Police takes every precautionary measure. We also have emergency teams in case of any untoward incidents, but so far we have been successful in avoiding.
Court asks petitioner if an adverse order can be made against a certain political party without impleading them: What about principles of natural justice?
Order: The respondents oppose the writ contending that necessary parties namely the recognised registered national political party is not made one of the respondents and therefore, no relief be granted.
Order: AAG assisted by battery of high-ranking police officers submits that the election rallies for the purpose of campaigning are held since very long. Even during this election process, such rallies have been held by parties.
Order: No untoward incident has been reported so far. The senior counsel for district election officer submits right to hold rallies during the election process has elements of right to speech, assembly and movement guaranteed under Article 19.
Order: Election Commission submits that these rallies are happening all over the country, particularly during election process, whether to be permitted is a matter pertaining to domain of law & order lying in the lap of the State.
Order: Commissioner made his brief and articulate submissions to the effect that police personnel are sufficiently available to handle tomorrow's rally in which central political executives are likely to participate.
Order: There is no record as to any untoward incident in any such rallies hitherto. He does not see any problem in effectively managing the law and order during the rallying period.
Order: The Chief Commissioner BBMP also gave valuable inputs saying that the application or grant of permission would be treated on normative basis, keeping in view all relevant factors.
Order: The submission of petitioner that rally is of the kind would disrupt day to day lives of several classes of people, more particularly students, hawkers, government employees and such others..
Order: He draws attention of court to newspaper reports. He submits, therefore there should be complete ban on holding of rallies of the kind before during and post elections.
Firstly, elections in India are treated as festive celebrations. During elections, right from first general elections in 1952 there are records to show rallies of the kind were held.
Court: The political rallies have some element of dissemination of knowledge and information about the election process to public at large. The apex court in Lily Thomas v UOI (2013) observed that there is need for dissemination...
Court: Respondents are more than justified in submitting that rallies of the kind having trappings of right to speech, assemble and move freely as under the constitution cannot be impeded. This view gains support from the fundamental..
The petitioner, to whose credit there are many PILs and who happens to be a practicing lawyer is not in a position to answer affirmatively as to there being any High Court decision or Apex Court that supports his view.
Court: On the contrary, there are decisions of the Kerala and Calcutta High Courts that specifically and in so many words permit the conduct of such rallies during the election process and otherwise.
Court: This court has been apprised of the precautionary measures by State.
First, DEO having expertise in the matter, personally assisted the court and responsibly made a statement that they will consider the application for permission...
Court: He submits that if permission was to be granted it would be for 26 kms tomorrow and 6.5 kilometres on May 7. Keeping in view, the NEET examination on the later day.
Court: The Commissioner of Police made a responsible statement that there would be no law and order problem being sufficient police force. The screening of gatherers would be broadly undertaken. All precautions would be taken to prevent stampede.
Court: Traffic diversions would be affected and public would be informed. The event would be informed to the police 108 control room for ambulance and other essential vehicle movements.
Court: Ld AAG appearing for State and Police submits that in matters like this, the court should loathe to interfere since it pertains to domain on the executive gained through experience over the years.
Court: He also echoes view of ECI that since the announcement of election dated 29.03.2023, totally 2517 rallies have been held throughout the State of which 371 were in Bengaluru with not even one bad event.
Court: This court places on record the broad submission made from respondents that while the political rally if undertaken tomorrow and day after, all precautions would be taken.
Court: If and when, any untoward incident happens or the police suspect or foresee the happening of such incidents the security would be taken from the organisers, said the commissioner. This decision would be taken on case to case basis.
Court: Petitioner when asked why he did not present the petition earlier said he got the information only through newspapers yesterday and therefore, he has presented the petition now.
Court: However, this is not pleaded in the petition itself. Some credence may be given to this version since copies of newspaper reports are produced as annexures.
Court: Ld AG when confronted with the questions regarding norms and guidelines for granting compensation to the injured or for repairs for damage to property submits that govt of the day will look into it before tomorrow.
Court: The court deeply appreciates the participation of the DEO and Commissioner of Police for effective assistance and assurances to public at large.
#SupremeCourt hears a plea which makes accusations of unfair treatment and discrimination in the promotion of women Indian Army officers who had been granted permanent commission #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice PS Narasimha: Regarding compliance of the judgment in Col Nitisha verdict..for this you can approach the High Court also.
Sr Adv V Mohana: But officers are going to retire now!
Petitioners submit that they will take an hour to argue.
Attorney General for India: we have complied with the judgment and unless there is serious discrepancy can the court be looked into this
Sr Adv V Mohana: vacancies are being given to us which is not within time limit
PIL by Lok Satta movement where it is alleged that millions of electorate names were deleted from the list
Adv: the reply by ECI is informative.. but let them address that they took note of it and how they handled it. multiple newspapers had reported this. just telling us… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI DY Chandrachud: we will as ECI to look into grievances and see what remedies have been taken. but these are also issues of deletion of names which is also due to document issues etc.. these are systemic issues and we can say ECI will look into this #SupremeCourt
Adv: 2 million people were deleted from Maharashtra.. 547 having same address from the same constituency.. that is why we suggested to have a common electoral roll..
"Totally unacceptable state of affairs," Delhi HC
reprimands Tihar jail authorities for their failure to prevent the murder of gangster Tillu Tajpuria.
The court has sought a status report and ordered the jail superintendent to remain personally present in the court.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Jasmeet Singh observed that the entire incident has been captured on CCTV camera and therefore he is unable to comprehend as to why steps were not taken by the authorities to prevent the murder.
"What's happening here? I am unable to get it. Can these inmates cut the bars and murder people? Has any official been suspended," the court questioned the government counsel.
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea by Youtuber Manish Kashyap seeking clubbing of First Information Reports (FIRs) for making fake videos of attacks on Bihari migrants #SupremeCourtofIndia#NSA
CJ Muralidhar: We are grateful CJI Chandrachud has managed to squeeze in time for this momentous event as to what digitization holds in store for the future of judiciary.
The Kerala High Court will shortly hear six petitions challenging the release of the movie 'The Kerala Story'. The case will be heard by a division bench of Justices N Nagaresh and Sophy Thomas.