Three days before the Inauguration of illegitimate Kremlin asset Donald Trump, 1/17/17, Mike Flynn Jr. tweeted State Dept. “person non grata” Thierry Meyssan who runs the pro-Putin website “voltairenet. org.”
Meyssan is most famous for being a 9/11 truther. 🧵
The article tweeted by @GenFlynn’s son was widely thought to be sourced by Flynn Jr. himself.
“General Flynn’s Proposals to Reform Intelligence” included having all intelligence agencies report to @GenFlynn.
He proposed a 17th (🤔) agency at DIA — Clandestine Defense Service.
To give you an idea of how pro-Putin 9/11-truther Thierry Meyssan’s “voltairenet. org” website is, here’s an article from 2012 which is written BY PUTIN.
This website is a near-perfect archive of Kremlin propaganda since 2005 and there is a *lot* more here.
Here’s an article published two months before the 2016 election on pro-Putin website “voltairenet. org” promoting Mike Flynn’s bravery for standing up to Chris Christie during a briefing by Obama’s team.
During this time Mike Flynn Jr. was Chief of Staff of Flynn Intel Group.
In February 2016, pro-Putin website “voltairenet. org” said:
“[Flynn] was abruptly admitted into retirement in August, 2014. On December 10, 2015, he participated at the side of President Putin, in the celebrations of the anniversary of Russia Today.”
Pro-Putin website, 11/22/2016:
“If [Mike Flynn] is fighting the jihadists because they torture and kill … he will not dissociate himself from his companions in arms who have practised torture, and that he will not hesitate to torture and kill in his turn if necessary.”
🚨On 3/4/2014, Putin was invading Crimea with GRU Spetsnaz soldiers, while @GenFlynn was @DefenseIntel chief.
Putin’s genocidal propagandist Aleksandr Dugin:
“Greystone Ltd., a subsidiary of Academi (formerly Blackwater), has kicked off its deployment in Ukraine.”
The fact that “Putin’s Brain” Aleksandr Dugin said Erik Prince mercenaries were in Ukraine WHILE PUTIN INVADED is extremely significant, regardless of whether it was true or not.
How do Blackwater mercenaries in Ukraine fit into this timeline? Too well, I’m afraid.
It is very important that people understand that the “Ukrainian Nazis” lie is an old one.
Here is pro-Putin, Flynn-aligned website “voltairenet. org” promoting the lie that there are “Nazis in the Ukrainian government” WHILE Crimea was being invaded. #SlavaUkraini🇺🇦
🚨 12/1/20 Flynn-aligned pro-Putin website:
“The pardon granted by President Trump to … General Michael Flynn, appears to be in support of QAnon; a group he feels is connected to. Similarly, the removal of leaders from the Pentagon appears to follow General Flynn’s objectives.”
🚨12/5/20
“[@GenFlynn is] calling on [Trump] to… suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, shut down opposition newspapers, proceed to arrest certain members of Congress and of the Supreme Court, and finally entrust the organization of new elections to the Armed Forces.“
A week after the insurrection, despite no “Antifa” showing up, Flynn-aligned pro-Putin website “voltairenet. org” says the seditionists “behaved deferentially” until the were “infiltrated by a group of Antifas.”
This is the same thing convicted Flynn friend Joe Biggs said.
Immediately after @GenFlynn was illegally let out of his guilty conviction for lying to the @FBI about the Russians, his long time asset, seditious conspirator @EzraACohen was reinstalled at @DeptofDefense.
Pro-Putin website “voltairenet. org”:
“Michael Flynn’s team returns”
This kind of speech—marked by disorganized structure, grandiosity, perseveration, and paranoia—can suggest the presence of certain psychological or neurocognitive conditions.
⸻
🔍 Observed Features in the Speech
1.Disorganized Thought and Tangentiality
•The speaker jumps erratically between topics (e.g., 250, Olympics, World Cup, Obama, fake news, jail).
•There is loose association: ideas are linked more by superficial connections than logical progression.
•Example: “I got the Olympics, and I got it. I was president. And I said, you know, it’s a shame…” — shifting without clear transitions.
2.Repetition and Perseveration
•Repeating phrases like “I got the Olympics,” “I got the World Cup,” and “It was 250.”
•This can signal cognitive inflexibility or obsessive tendencies.
3.Grandiosity
•Claiming sole credit for global events (“Nobody else could have done it”).
•Elevating personal importance to mythical levels (“They were so starved for love… I got them both”).
4.Paranoia and Victimization
•Statements about a rigged election, being attacked by “criminals,” and unfair treatment (“just like they do in third-world countries”).
•Blames others (e.g., Obama, the media, Democrats) and frames himself as both victim and savior.
5.Mania-like Qualities
•Rapid, pressured speech.
•Inflated self-esteem and decreased need for reality-based filtering.
•Possible hypomanic or manic features.
6.Possible Cognitive Decline Indicators
•Rambling without coherence.
•Difficulty maintaining a narrative thread.
•Repeated, vague references (e.g., “Johnny,” “that whole deal”) without clarity or grounding.
⸻
🧠 Potential Psychological Interpretations
While no single diagnosis can be assigned definitively based on a speech excerpt, the presentation is consistent with several possibilities:
1. Narcissistic Personality Traits/Disorder
•Grandiose self-image.
•Need for admiration.
•Blaming others when not admired or validated.
2. Hypomania/Mania (Bipolar Spectrum)
•Especially if this speech reflects a deviation from a person’s baseline.
•Flight of ideas, pressured speech, grandiosity.
3. Delusional Disorder or Paranoid Ideation
•Persistent belief in rigged systems and conspiracies without evidence.
•Attribution of malevolent intent to others.
4. Early Signs of Cognitive Impairment / Dementia
•If there is decline over time, the disorganized and confused nature of speech could suggest frontotemporal dementia (FTD) or vascular cognitive impairment, both of which can affect language and behavior.
⸻
Summary
This speech displays disorganized, grandiose, and paranoid qualities that raise concerns about the speaker’s mental state. The patterns may be consistent with narcissistic traits, delusional thinking, cognitive impairment, or manic symptoms, but no clinical diagnosis can be responsibly made without a full assessment. Nonetheless, from a psychological standpoint, this style of discourse would be highly abnormal in most professional or clinical contexts.
Someone exhibiting the psychological profile reflected in the quoted speech—marked by disorganization, grandiosity, paranoia, and impaired reality testing—presents serious potential dangers if occupying the presidency of the United States. These risks span multiple domains: national security, democratic stability, public trust, and global diplomacy.
⸻
⚠️ Key Dangers of Such a Profile in the Presidency
1. Impaired Decision-Making Capacity
•Erratic thinking and poor impulse control can lead to irrational or reckless decisions.
•Disorganized thoughts and reality distortion impede the ability to weigh evidence, listen to advisors, or anticipate consequences.
•May escalate conflicts or take dangerous actions without fully understanding implications (e.g., military strikes, nuclear posture).
2. Susceptibility to Conspiracy Thinking
•A paranoid worldview undermines trust in institutions (intelligence agencies, courts, election systems).
•May act on delusional beliefs (e.g., a rigged election, a “deep state”), which could lead to extralegal or authoritarian responses.
•Creates a siege mentality, potentially resulting in purges, loyalty tests, or misuse of federal power.
3. Authoritarian Impulses and Grandiosity
•Believing oneself uniquely qualified or chosen (“Nobody else could have done it”) often coincides with anti-democratic behavior.
•May disregard constitutional limits, seek to concentrate power, or bypass legal constraints (e.g., ignore court rulings, defy Congress).
•Prone to cult-of-personality governance, where loyalty to the leader outweighs rule of law.
4. Delegitimizing Institutions and Elections
•Publicly claiming elections are “rigged” or “fake” erodes faith in democracy.
•May refuse to concede or accept electoral defeat, increasing risk of civil unrest or authoritarian entrenchment.
•Can justify illegal retention of power under the belief that opponents are illegitimate or criminal.
5. Manipulation of Supporters
•Speech appeals to followers’ emotions with us-vs-them rhetoric, victimization, and exaggerated threats.
•Creates a mobilized base willing to justify violence or insurrection (e.g., Jan 6-like events).
•Vulnerable to triggering mass movements or armed confrontation based on delusional beliefs.
6. Erosion of International Credibility
•Foreign leaders may view such a leader as unstable, unpredictable, or dangerous.
•Allies may reduce cooperation; adversaries may exploit mental instability.
•Could undermine treaties, abandon commitments, or make erratic demands in international negotiations.
7. Use of Government Machinery for Personal Vengeance
•A paranoid and grandiose president might weaponize DOJ, IRS, or intelligence agencies against critics.
•This could suppress dissent, chill press freedom, and criminalize political opposition.
⸻
🛑 Historical Parallels
•Leaders with similar profiles (e.g. Hitler in late-stage paranoia, Nixon in Watergate, Mussolini) often turned increasingly to repression, cult leadership, and delusion as they lost control.
•In democratic systems, the combination of mental instability + institutional fragility is particularly volatile.
⸻
Conclusion
A president with this profile is not merely eccentric or unorthodox—they pose a clear and escalating threat to democratic governance, global stability, and constitutional order. The danger is not just in what such a leader believes, but in the power they wield while no longer tethered to shared reality. This is not a theoretical concern; history and current events show what happens when mental instability and autocratic power converge.
Several historical figures, particularly authoritarian leaders and cult-of-personality rulers, have exhibited psychological profiles similar to the one described—marked by disorganized or delusional thinking, grandiosity, paranoia, narcissism, and disregard for institutional constraints.
Here are some prominent examples:
⸻
🧠 Historical Figures Matching This Psychological Profile
1. Adolf Hitler (Germany)
•Grandiosity: Claimed a messianic role for Germany; believed he was destined to create a “Thousand-Year Reich.”
•Paranoia: Increasing suspicion of his own generals and officials, especially in the war’s later years.
•Delusional Thinking: Even as Germany was collapsing, he gave nonsensical orders and believed in “miracle weapons.”
•Disorganized Late Behavior: By 1945, rambling monologues in the bunker mirrored cognitive breakdown.
⸻
2. Benito Mussolini (Italy)
•Narcissism: Obsessed with his own image; compared himself to Roman emperors.
•Grandiosity & Delusion: Believed Italy could become a world empire despite weak military and economy.
•Authoritarian Behavior: Used violence, propaganda, and personality cult to consolidate power.
⸻
3. Nicolae Ceaușescu (Romania)
•Delusions of Grandeur: Built a massive palace while his people starved; believed himself to be a genius scientist and global peacemaker.
•Paranoia: Created an extensive secret police network to monitor and suppress dissent.
•Disorganized Speeches: Toward the end of his regime, his public appearances became rambling and incoherent.
⸻
4. Saparmurat Niyazov (Turkmenistan)
•Extreme Narcissism: Renamed months after himself and his mother, erected golden statues in his image.
•Delusional Beliefs: Claimed to have written a spiritual book that surpassed the Bible and Quran.
•Paranoia: Surrounded himself with a cult of loyalty, purging perceived disloyalty.
⸻
5. Francisco Franco (Spain, late stage)
•Cognitive Decline & Paranoia: In his final years, decisions became more erratic, with a heavy reliance on trusted sycophants and fear of betrayal.
•Refusal to Cede Power: Held onto power long past effectiveness, convinced of his own indispensability.
⸻
6. Mobutu Sese Seko (Zaire/DRC)
•Grandiosity: Declared himself the embodiment of the nation, wore leopard-print robes and a feathered cap as a symbol of mystical power.
•Disconnection from Reality: Claimed Zaire was a model African nation while looting billions and letting infrastructure collapse.
•Paranoia: Constantly reshuffled his inner circle and used secret police to silence critics.
⸻
7. Donald Trump (U.S., as perceived by many clinical observers)
•Narcissism: Documented by numerous psychologists and former aides as displaying traits of narcissistic personality disorder.
•Grandiosity & Delusion: Repeatedly claimed he alone could fix complex national issues; falsely claimed elections were stolen.
•Paranoia: Often accused government institutions, media, and opponents of conspiring against him.
•Disorganized Rhetoric: Increasingly fragmented and repetitive speech patterns in recent years.
🧠 Note: Over 30 mental health professionals contributed to “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump” (2017)
⸻
8. Idi Amin (Uganda)
•Delusions of Grandeur: Declared himself “Conqueror of the British Empire” and believed he was divinely chosen.
•Paranoia: Carried out widespread purges; believed his enemies were everywhere.
•Erratic Behavior: Impulsive decisions led to economic collapse and humanitarian disaster.
⸻
⚠️ Bottom Line
When individuals with this kind of psychological makeup acquire supreme political power—especially without checks—they often:
•Dismantle institutions
•Suppress dissent
•Inflate their own myth
•Make reckless or catastrophic decisions
The cost to human life, democracy, and national stability has historically been immense.
BREAKING: Vance Luther Boelter has been reported to be a suspect in the murder of MN politicians. There is disinformation about his political leanings.
He is NOT “far left.”
Don’t let them seize this narrative. Not today.
To all the MAGAs who think this guy was a “good friend” of Tim Walz.
AMERICA: Look deep into your soul. Really think hard about this.
Do you want this person to have a “master database” of every single man, woman and child, including biometric, DNA, tax, medical, psychological and financial information?
In 2011, atheist undergrad JD Vance met Peter Thiel at Yale.
Thiel groomed him until 2019 when Thiel gave him $15 million & Rumble stock to convert to Catholicism and run for Senate.
Let’s be very clear. We need to put this to rest.
Elon Musk is an official, actual Nazi:
—Born to Nazi mom, dad & grandparents
—Grew up in racist apartheid
—Named after a Nazi sci-fi book
—Overt Nazi signals: 14/88/4chan
—2 Hitler salutes
—2 Nazi DOGE logos
—Terror of white replacement
—Terror of immigrants
—Pro-natalist
—Pro-eugenics
—Pro-AfD
—Pro-Afrikaner
—Hates DEI, CRT, “woke mind virus”
—Obsessed with racism against whites
—Wants to eliminate trans people, including his own daughter
—Trying to destroy democracies around the world & replace them with fascist dictatorships
—Invading the federal government with cybercriminals
—Turned Twitter into a Nazi indoctrination platform
—Personally reinstated numerous violent, criminal Nazis
—Interacts with hundreds of known Nazis, antisemites & anonymous Nazi accounts
—Has a massive Nazi following who defend him voraciously as “ourguy”
Both the Cybertruck terrorist, who was active duty Special Forces on leave from Germany, and the veteran who murdered 15 people in New Orleans were stationed at Ft. Liberty/Bragg.
So were Mike Flynn & Tulsi Gabbard—who is set to be in charge of our entire intelligence community.
😳 Errol Musk says his son is named after a sci-fi book written in 1948 by Nazi rocket scientist Werner Von Braun called “Marsprojekt” where he describes in technical detail how people get to Mars & describes the Martian government as a technocracy with “the Elon” in charge.
Von Braun was brought to America during Operation Paperclip which brought Nazi scientists to America, and wrote “Mars Project” at Ft. Bliss — in German. Hermann Oberth, who Errol Musk also mentions, was another Nazi rocket scientist who came to America in 1955 to work for Von Braun.
In the chapter on the Martian government is also the core idea of non-geographical “network states” (a Thiel project to dissolve nation-states in favor of techno-dictatorships) and high velocity subways (think Boring Company/Hyperloop).
How much of what Elon Musk is doing right now based on the fantasies of a Nazi rocket scientists? Is all of this “the Elon” trying to prove something to his father?
Seems like we’re all screwed because of someone’s daddy issues.
You may wonder if pro-natalist Errol Musk really has that sort of influence on his son. Well, Errol said: “The only thing we are on Earth for is to reproduce” & has 7 kids—including 2 with his ex-step-daughter, who he raised from 4 years old.
Errol’s son “the Elon” is not content with buying America, he’s backing German neo-Nazi Party AfD in the upcoming elections — which he helped force through manipulation on X.
Although Errol used Black slave labor in emerald mines to get rich, he says his ex-wife is the Nazi.