DAY 1: Notions of man, woman, genitals do not define gender in absolute sense, Supreme Court says rb.gy/jdv58
DAY 2: Argument that children of same-sex married couple will be impacted incorrect; gay, lesbian persons can already adopt individually: Supreme Court… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SG Tushar Mehta: this is the time we have distributed among ourselves..
ASG Aishwarya Bhati begins: there is a basic structure of marriage and that is the union of man and woman. then there is gender fluidity is impermissible where cis gender is core and ignoring rationale of valid classification leads to inequality... there are areas reserved for… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Bhati: the entire architecture of the laws are from the point that the welfare of the child is paramount.
Bhati: please see the legitimate state interest in ideal mode of child rearing. a child can only be naturally born through a heterosexual couple and thus recognition of heterosexual marriage cannot be seen differently from the child birth and upbringing and father and mother… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Bhati reads a paper: conventional beats unconventional everytime..
CJI: But our law permits single parents to adopt.. is it now
Bhati: I am coming to that.. human child rarely is one of the most helpless child in nature and needs all pervasive care ,, and thus mothers… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Bhat: we have moved on.. now there are single fathers are bringing up children.. this is evolving.. what is unchanging is the welfare of the child..
Bhati: adoption is not an alternate for child birth..
CJI: There is no compulsion to have biological children and that is why our law evisages that beyond the realm of a couple having a child.. adoption is away.. what if a mother passes away... the fathers takes on both the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI : Is it your case that a right which is available to a single person is taken away when you are in a same sex relation or marriage.. or two people in a live in relation who are heterosexual..?
CJI: If a couple wants to adopt.. our law only recognise right to adopt only if you are in a heterosexual marriage..what we are asking is nonetheless law recognises right of single to adopt.. your position is right of single is not affected with the relation the person has… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI : So a live in couple cannot adopt as a couple but existence of a live in relation does not prohibit of adopting a child as a single individual
Bhati: yes
CJI: That individual right to adopt is not affected by the marital status of the individual.
CJI: Can we summarise that there is no recognition of same sex marriage..there is no recognition of a same sex couple to adopt since stability would exist according to you in a heterosexual marriage
Bhati: If spouse is read in special marriage act.. children will suffer the most.. it cannot even be fathomed... but they will suffer.. the entire architecture of this courts judgment and statutes has been from the prism of the child and no on else.
Bhat: a single man cannot adopt a girl child.. and even an adopted child can conduct a root search upon attaining majority.. 30,000 parents are registered as prospective adoptive parents in CARA and there are only 1500 children are in the pool for adoption..
Sr Adv Nadkarni: concept of marriage in Indian society is an institution by itself.. whether in Hindu law it is a sacrament so divine..in Mohammedan law a contract.. recognising same sex marriage is an attack on this institution... please see… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Nadkarni: India has not reached that level that a union of this kind can be allowed. #samesexmarriage
Adv Manisha Lavkumar Shah appears for the state of Gujarat: marriage is a public act between two consenting individuals... SMA is part of a wider spectrum...
Shah: marriage has very serious consequences. This court is examining the edifice of a social institution and a myriad of marital statutes.. it is an entire regime which is regulated.. all of this is based on heteronormative relation..
Justice Bhat: what do you mean by sanctification narrative in context of heterosexual marriages
Shah: institution of marriage predated any legislation.. just take prohibited relationship under section 4(D)...
Shah: any recognition de hors a regulatory regime will not be proper.. what will happen to prohibited relationships etc then ..petitioners saying parliament will not look into it is not correct.. ordinarily the court will leave it to the parliament..
Adv J Sai Deepak: I kept hearing constitution is a liberal document... is it to say that social conservatism has no place in the constitution... does the society have no role to say and draw a red line that thus far and no further.. i believe that they have a cause but I do not… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Adv J Sai Deepak: even with respect of SMA, society has a right to participate. i have placed reliance of manual of parliamentary procedures...
Adv J Sai Deepak: judicial mechanism cannot be a substitute to any of the steps in the parliamentary process. in hindu law the object of dampatiya is procreation... now question on what happens to a single homosexual parent: when normative attitudes are sought to be represented..… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Adv J Sai Deepak reads a judgment ..
Justice Bhat: yes we know these judgments, and we know how to read them, we dont have to be taught.
J Sai Deepak: the yogyakarta principle leaves it to the countries to decide if they want to recognise such marital unions... if judicial intervention is allowed in this case.. then what happens in the future has to be seen, there are other issues.. having engaged with some… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Adv MR Shamshad: The Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 refers to the ways of dissolution of marriage.. but as a mode also refers to ways under the Muslim personal law.. if this right of same sex marriage is recognised.. not only it will be recognised in personal laws..… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
BJD Rajya Sabha MP Sasmit Patra: I will speak on impact on public policy due to legislative process and I also speak on the parliamentary process. Please see the Jan Vishwas Bill 2022... Without personal laws in ambit this issue of same sex marriage cannot be taken up
Patra: 42 laws will be affected, 118 amendments will be needed dealing with 19 laws... Look at the surrogacy bill ..sensitive... Sent to a committee and now sent to parliament. A mediation bill was sent to the committee and 23 meetings have taken place..this shows capacity and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Intervenor: same sex relation being recognised will lead to bigamy in the country
CJI: We got it
Intervenor: let me explain it
CJI: No no we got it.. we get the thought behind it #samesexmarriage
Adv Shashank Shekhar Jha: marriage is not a private affair, it is a social affair
CJI: thank you we got
Jha: we need new laws to accomodate rights to homosexual unions
CJI: Got it
Adv AP Singh: homosexuality is not natural..and such union is not natural
CJI: ok thanks we got it...
Adv Anston Thomas: CJI should recuse from this particular matter
CJI: Application rejected. thank you
SG Tushar Mehta: I object to this submission being made
SG Tushar Mehta: any declaration of law would bind every individual in this country who is not even before this court. We knew about the judgment in bakers case where he refused to bake a cake in a same sex marriage case and he was prosecuted.. and then a pastor refused to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Bhat: what is the form, contour of declaration is important.. we all are thinking grant this and grant that..
SG: Legislature has the wherewithal of dealing with the fall out..,
CJI: So any declaration will apply to all and pre empt the legislature..
SG: We have seven responses from state govenrments.. Rajasthan has taken a position that they have examined it and they oppose it and all rest say that this needs an expansive debate and we wont be able to respond immediately #samesexmarriage
[REJOINDER BEGINS]
Dr AM Singhvi: my arguments are broadly are under three heads: first, that a constitution compliant reading ..
SG: how can the notice etc of SMA be argued now since we did not address the point.. it was stated that the case will be heard separately
Justice Kaul: it is being felt that since it is liked with heterosexual marriage it will be appropriate to hear it with both kinds... bench is saying let it rule that you have a right of marriage first or not.
Singhvi: was the Navtej Johar judgment not a value judgment?
CJI: No it was not
Justice Bhat: you are not taking it heads on.. you have to say that classification is not correct.. but you are not going that far because you have no locus... otherwise say strike down.. just… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Bhat: say that the classification is illegal
Singhvi: yes i am saying that
Justice Bhat: so heterosexual classification is illegal?
Singhvi: it can become legal when you read spouse person in SMA
Singhvi: today the number of queer people have gone up.. so when there is a secular agnostic platform for heterosexuals why not for them...
Singhvi: give me some time tomorrow
CJI: There is a reference tomorrow. there are 2 constitution bench judgments we are pronouncing… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: Reference will be 10:30 to 11... then 2 constitution bench judgments which will take 20 minutes.. then let everyone finish by 1 pm from 12 pm #SupremeCourtofIndia
Singhvi: petitioners are only asking for non discriminatory access to rights.
Justice Bhat: 2 spouse of same sex. if one dies.. then what is the kind of estate they will inherit.. if its a so you treat as son and daughter is treated as daughter.. but what about spouse
CJI: When a male intestate dies then the spouse is the next in kin... now you want to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Bhat: so we are not reading in, we are not reading up, we are not striking down, not upholding..
CJI DY Chandrachud: Dr Singhvi. we are not writing a blog, we have to write a judgment
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: if you don't agree to SMA, this court grants us a declaration that we have a right to marry... we need some document saying that we are married.. i cannot take the judgment... we would be asked for proof.. a document of marriage between two individuals can… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
DAY 1: Notions of man, woman, genitals do not define gender in absolute sense, Supreme Court says rb.gy/jdv58
DAY 2: Argument that children of same-sex married couple will be impacted incorrect; gay, lesbian persons can already adopt individually: Supreme Court… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#SupremeCourtOfIndia to shortly verdict in the tussle between the Central and Delhi governments regarding the administrative control over transfers and postings of civil servants in the national capital
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench to shortly deliver verdict in a batch of petitions concerning #MaharashtraPoliticalCrisis which culminated in Eknath Shinde taking over as Chief Minister from Uddhav Thackeray following a split in the Shiv Sena
Five-judge Constitution Bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P S Narasimha to deliver verdict at 11 am today #MaharashtraPolitics#SupremeCourtofIndia
Maharashtra Politics case: Read about 8-day long hearing before Supreme Court in the Eknath Shinde-Uddhav Thackeray battle
Delhi HC orders that the observations made by the trial court while granting bail to Gautam Malhotra and Rajesh Joshi in the money laundering case will not be relied upon by any other co-accused in any proceedings.
While granting bail to Joshi and Malhotra, the trial court has observed that there is not enough material on record to show that the case against them is genuine.
The court had also questioned the ED's claims regarding payment of kickbacks and the use of alleged bribes in AAP's… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma passed the order today after ED moved HC challenging the trial court's order.
ED sought cancellation of bail granted to Joshi and Malhotra and demanded that the observations and findings must not be used by any of the co-accused in any proceedings.
Supreme Court to shortly deliver verdict on application by former Gujarat IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt seeking recusal of Justice MR Shah from hearing a pending case of his.
Justice Shah had earlier orally remarked against recusing.