🧵2/Ω
Let's just conveniently ignore the fact that the auditor who provides #Tether's "attestations" that are in no way anything like an audit has never mentioned "profits".
(Also read the rest of @intel_jakal's 🧵 as they have the numbers.)
🧵7/Ω
All of these are bad. Every possibility leads to one conclusion:
Tether is at least partially unbacked.
🧵8/Ω
Because by their own numbers they made $700mm in 2023-Q1 and $1.5bn in 2023-Q2. That $2.2bn is the sum total of all the profits they have ever announced.
But the $1.5bn they hold at bitcoin that they just bought would be 68% (not 15%) of those profits.
🧵9/Ω
It gets worse though. Look at the timing of when Tether bought these bitcoins (because they have to have bought them recently, right?) compared to the announcements of bad news for #Binance, #CryptoCom, etc.
🧵10/Ω
Or how about that time #Tether printed billions of $USDT straight into the US government's sale of 9 figures worth of bitcoin it seized from Silk Road?
🧵11/Ω
I always come back to what Jim Chanos (@WallStCynica) said about #Tether on @CryptoCriticPod last summer because I really think it is the correct way to think about the situation and is also easy to explain to "normies":
🧵12/Ω
While it is impossible to say for sure bc #Tether's audits, like unicorns, do not and will never exist, to me it looks a lot like they printed a bunch of $USDT out of thin air, used it to pump the BTC price, and now they have to explain how they got all these bitcoins.
🧵13/Ω
Also more importantly #Tether's biggest risk is a bank run. The rational thing to do would be to have a pile of cash around to be able to meet redemptions, not buy bitcoins. So even if they are telling the truth¹ they are announcing gross incompetence
¹ hint: they're not
🧵14/Ω *correction* #Tether only ever announced $1.5 billion in "profits" so that means they spent at least 99% of their "profits" to buy bitcoin.
(I was confused bc it was $700 million then somehow magically became $1.5 billion a few weeks later.)
🧵15/Ω
But that's just more evidence to my point, which is that they needed to somehow explain where this $1.5 billion in Bitcoin came from. A few weeks ago maybe they only need to explain $700mm but things done changed.
🧵16/Ω
Scope this: the day Tether announces "profits" the price of BTC did a massive pump and dump "bart" formation?
It's almost as if someone needed the price of BTC to be at a given place to make "profits" hit a certain number so they pumped...
🧵17/Ω
To really spell it out: if the $1.48bn in "profits" was used to buy bitcoins and those bitcoins were listed in the attestation as the backing for $1.5 billion in USDT then they weren't profits at all.
🧵19/Ω
In case anyone's wondering where Tether found an extra $800 million between their announcement of $700 million and their announcement that "aw shucks it was actually $1.5 billion" i have a hypothesis...
🧵20/Ω
One has to wonder whether #Tether plans to start redeeming $USDT for Bitcoin because they can't access their bank accounts any more or similar...
It's in the the terms of service that they can do that and they did do that back in 2018.
🚩 One of Santos's biggest donors was Dan Friedberg, the (deeply corrupt) lawyer for UltimateBet, Tether, and FTX's "Chief Compliance Officer" (be scared of those quotes).
He also took a ton of money from others FTXers.
FTX banked at Silvergate / $SI...
and so did Miles Guo🤔
running a search for [@]Blockchain AKA "Blockchain.com" AKA "one of the oldest and theoretically more reputable companies in the European blockchain space" right now and reading the recent tweets is a bit of a heartbreaking exercise...
❓ I'm just going to throw out there that I find the fact that $COIN somehow registered *exactly* the same overall trading volume for 2022-Q4 and 2023-Q1 is kind of... unsettling. almost as if someone planned it that way. or washed it that way, as the case may be...
i mean coincidences like this definitely do happen, so this isn't necessarily an accusation... but seriously these were two extremely different quarters with a LOT going on (FTX, USDC de-peg, Binance kicked off the dollar system, etc.) And there's no movement?
I decided to test this theory by looking at the quarterly on chain activity for the big tokens on the ethereum chain to see if they also stayed flat as a kind of imperfect proxy. they stayed more flat than i would have guessed but still... have a look. $COIN
Ω👇Ω
➤ thank god for jerome powell
➤ retail customers getting fleeced
➤ shitcoins are king
🧵2/Ω
I'll say it again: shitcoins are king.
🧵3/Ω
$COIN is saying assets on platform are up 62% because more people moved their crypto onto Coinbase but... isn't the price of BTC and ETH also up like 70%?
🚨Ω🚨
$CUBI is now one of the most exposed banks, if not the single most crypto exposed bank, in the United States. They're also relying on brokered deposits to stay solvent, meaning they have to pay the highest interest rate of any bank or risk losing their deposits.
🧵2/Ω
$CUBI is running the same game as $SBNY. Not even just the same game - they're literally running the same software. #TassatPay is just rebranded #SigNET. It's the kind of platform money launderers have wet dreams about.
🧵3/Ω
About $CUBI's brokered deposits game... They don't even have someone to negotiate with because #MaxMyInterest is apparently fully automated. In other words, #CodeIsLOL.