Geoengineering Info Profile picture
May 17, 2023 13 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🚨NEW STUDY🚨

Recent research analyzed "future wildfires burned areas & C emissions under #SolarGeoengineering & Shared Socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) scenarios & assessed how the different geoengineering approaches impact #fires."

Results are discussed in a 🧵 below ⬇️:
1/13 Image
The major conclusions and implications drawn from this study are as follows:
2/13
1️⃣ "The global total #wildfire burned A is projected to rise under the unmitigated scenario (SSP5-8.5) & drop under the 2 #geoengineering scenarios (#SolarIrradianceReduction & #StratosphericSulfateAerosols) based on a comparison of the averages of 2091–2100 as to 2021–2030."
3/ Image
2️⃣ "By the end of the century, the two #geoengineering scenarios exhibit lower burned area and fire carbon emissions than not only their base-forcing scenario (SSP5-8.5) but also the targeted-forcing scenario (SSP2-4.5)."
4/13 Image
3️⃣ "The 2 #geoengineering approaches (#SolarIrradianceReduction & #StratosphericSulfateAerosols) generally lead to less wildfire activity in most regions in 2091–2100, except for Northern Hemisphere Africa & equatorial Asia."
5/13 Image
Cont'd....
"The 40–70∘ N latitude band is the only latitude band in which the zonal mean burned area consistently increases under all of the scenarios, even the #geoengineering scenarios."
6/13
4️⃣ "Overall, changes in G6solar & #G6sulfur from SSP5-8.5 with respect to surface temperature, wind speed, and downwelling #SolarFlux at the surface are positively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire carbon emissions,....
7/13 ImageImage
Cont'd....
whereas their changes in precipitation, relative humidity, and soil water content are negatively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire #CarbonEmissions."
8/13 Image
5️⃣ "Generally, the #StratosphericSulfateAerosols approach has a stronger fire-reducing effect than the #SolarIrradianceReduction approach. The impacts of the analyzed variable changes are generally larger (percent-wise) on burned area than fire carbon emissions."
9/13 Image
6️⃣ "#Geoengineering-imposed reductions in surface temperature & wind speed & geoengineering-imposed increases in relative humidity & soil moisture reduce fires by the end of the century."
10/13
Cont'd...
"However, the reduction in precipitation resulting from #geoengineering offsets its overall fire-reducing effect to some extent."
11/13
Read open-access paper entitled: "Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6" here ⬇️
acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/54…

#SolarGeoengineering
#Wildfires
#StratosphericSulfateAerosol
#SolarIrradianceReduction

12/13

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Geoengineering Info

Geoengineering Info Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @geoengineering1

Feb 27
🚨The Big Green Button: Who Gets to Push It?

"Geoengineering isn't just a climate issue—it's a geopolitical chess game. Only US & China have power to unilaterally deploy #SAI at scale."

Will they race to control skies or seek climate diplomacy? New study explores 4 futures🧵1/9 Image
2/ SAI could cool the planet—but who controls it controls global climate security.

Key risks of unilateral deployment:
🔴 Termination shock
🔴 Environmental disruptions
🔴 SAI as a potential weapon
🔴 Geopolitical leverage—both a threat & opportunity Image
3/ This creates a security gap:

The US & China are locked in great power competition, yet neither has a clear strategy on SAI.

Who moves first? Who controls the stratosphere? The dilemma: Deploy & gain influence—or deter & risk falling behind? Image
Read 11 tweets
Feb 25
🚨🗓CDR REMINDERS!🗓🚨

Here's a list of what's coming up this week (25 February - 03 March 2025) in the field of #CarbonDioxideRemoval

#CDREvents #Deadlines #CDRJobs

🔗🗓️Link to the CDR Events Calendar:


🧵1/19 teamup.com/kshqbfhrqkw36s…Image
EVENT—This is CDR: Octavia Carbon’s Project Hummingbird – Pioneering Direct Air Capture in Africa by @openaircollect

🗓25 February 2025
📍Online
🔗

2/19youtube.com/live/fmbCJIFEt…
EVENT—CDR at DoE is dead - or is it? by CDR Policy Scoop

🗓25 February 2025
📍Online
🔗

3/19linkedin.com/events/cdratdo…
Read 21 tweets
Feb 23
📝💡𝐖𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐥𝐲 𝐂𝐃𝐑 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬💡📝

📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (17 February - 23 February 2025):

🔗:

🧵0/19
@Arcaclimate has secured $12.2 million from Australian venture capital firms Side Stage Ventures and Saniel Ventures to help scale its carbon removal technology at Western Australian mine sites.

1/19
capitalbrief.com/briefing/arca-…
Qualterra, a company that converts organic waste into biochar for soil health and carbon sequestration, secured $4.5M to expand biochar production, launch carbon credits, and scale plant propagation.

2/19
biochartoday.com/2025/02/23/qua…
Read 22 tweets
Feb 20
🚨What if we could remove methane from the atmosphere—fast?🚨

A new study proposes two ways to use 𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐡𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 to destroy this powerful GHG: one with reactors, the other by releasing chlorine into the air. But one of these ideas comes with serious risks:🧵1/10 Image
2/ Methane is a powerful but short-lived greenhouse gas, responsible for ~0.5°C of global warming. "It’s 80x more potent than CO₂ over 20 years," and its atmospheric levels continue to rise—despite global pledges to cut emissions. Image
3/ In nature, hydroxyl (OH) radicals break down methane, but the process is slow.

Chlorine (Cl) radicals can do the same job 16x faster, though they are far less abundant in atm—destroying only ~1-4% of methane today.

What if we increased chlorine’s role?
Read 11 tweets
Feb 18
🚨🐺Scotland’s lost forests could rise again with the help of wolves🐺🚨

A new study finds that reintroducing these apex predators in the Scottish Highlands could restore wild woodlands & capture 𝟏 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐎₂ 𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 (#CDR). Here’s how:🧵1/7 Image
2/ The Scottish Highlands were once a land of towering pines and roaming wolves. But 250 years ago, wolves vanished—and with them, nature’s balance. Red deer, left unchecked, now number 400,000, grazing young trees before they can take root.
3/ Researchers modeled what would happen if wolves returned to the Cairngorms, the Central Highlands, and beyond.

Their findings? 167 wolves could reduce deer numbers enough for forests to regrow naturally—on a vast scale. Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 18
🚨🗓CDR REMINDERS!🗓🚨

Here's a list of what's coming up this week (18 February - 24 February 2025) in the field of #CarbonDioxideRemoval

#CDREvents #Deadlines #CDRJobs

🔗🗓️Link to the CDR Events Calendar:


🧵1/21 teamup.com/kshqbfhrqkw36s…Image
EVENT—Carbon Removal Challenge Info Session: The Makings of a Great CDR Project by OpenAir Collective

🗓18 February 2025
📍Online
🔗

2/21lu.ma/48hbtpjl
EVENT—Tracking progress on carbon removal across Europe by Carbon Gap

🗓18 February 2025
📍Brussels
🔗

3/21carbongap.org/the-carbon-cou…
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(