Recent research analyzed "future wildfires burned areas & C emissions under #SolarGeoengineering & Shared Socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) scenarios & assessed how the different geoengineering approaches impact #fires."
Results are discussed in a 🧵 below ⬇️:
1/13
The major conclusions and implications drawn from this study are as follows:
2/13
2️⃣ "By the end of the century, the two #geoengineering scenarios exhibit lower burned area and fire carbon emissions than not only their base-forcing scenario (SSP5-8.5) but also the targeted-forcing scenario (SSP2-4.5)."
4/13
Cont'd....
"The 40–70∘ N latitude band is the only latitude band in which the zonal mean burned area consistently increases under all of the scenarios, even the #geoengineering scenarios."
6/13
4️⃣ "Overall, changes in G6solar & #G6sulfur from SSP5-8.5 with respect to surface temperature, wind speed, and downwelling #SolarFlux at the surface are positively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire carbon emissions,....
7/13
Cont'd....
whereas their changes in precipitation, relative humidity, and soil water content are negatively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire #CarbonEmissions."
8/13
5️⃣ "Generally, the #StratosphericSulfateAerosols approach has a stronger fire-reducing effect than the #SolarIrradianceReduction approach. The impacts of the analyzed variable changes are generally larger (percent-wise) on burned area than fire carbon emissions."
9/13
6️⃣ "#Geoengineering-imposed reductions in surface temperature & wind speed & geoengineering-imposed increases in relative humidity & soil moisture reduce fires by the end of the century."
10/13
Cont'd...
"However, the reduction in precipitation resulting from #geoengineering offsets its overall fire-reducing effect to some extent."
11/13
Read open-access paper entitled: "Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6" here ⬇️ acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/54…
🚨A new study has revealed for the first time that ancient carbon, stored in landscapes for thousands of years or more, can find its way back to the atmosphere as CO₂ is released from the surfaces of rivers at a rate of 1.2 billion tonnes per year.
Details🧵1/8
2/ To understand the true source of river CO₂, researchers compiled a global dataset of 1,195 radiocarbon measurements of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), CO₂ & CH₄ from rivers & streams.
This let them determine whether the emitted carbon was modern—or much older.
3/ Using radiocarbon signatures (¹⁴C), they found that 59% of river CO₂ emissions come from "old" C—millennia-old soil carbon & even petrogenic carbon (rock-derived, >55,000 years old)
Only ~41% came from recent biological sources like plants & microbes (decadal carbon).
🚨A NEW study explores a theoretical #geoengineering approach to combat global warming — by altering Earth’s orbit.
Simulations suggest that shifting Earth ~5.8% farther from the Sun could cool the planet by roughly 7K, effectively offsetting projected warming.
DETAILS🧵1/10
2/ Climate models suggest global temperatures could rise by 7K by 2100, driven by greenhouse gas emissions.
This study asks: what if, instead of changing the atmosphere, we changed our position in space?
Specifically: increase Earth’s orbital radius.
3/ Basically, the paper builds on the science of Milankovitch cycles which is slow, natural variations in Earth’s orbit and tilt that have triggered past ice ages.
These cycles show that even slight orbital changes can dramatically affect climate.
CALL FOR RESEARCH PRESENTATION PROPOSAL—RFF and the Harvard Solar Geoengineering Research Program invite individuals to present research at their upcoming workshop