Recent research analyzed "future wildfires burned areas & C emissions under #SolarGeoengineering & Shared Socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) scenarios & assessed how the different geoengineering approaches impact #fires."
Results are discussed in a 🧵 below ⬇️:
1/13
The major conclusions and implications drawn from this study are as follows:
2/13
2️⃣ "By the end of the century, the two #geoengineering scenarios exhibit lower burned area and fire carbon emissions than not only their base-forcing scenario (SSP5-8.5) but also the targeted-forcing scenario (SSP2-4.5)."
4/13
Cont'd....
"The 40–70∘ N latitude band is the only latitude band in which the zonal mean burned area consistently increases under all of the scenarios, even the #geoengineering scenarios."
6/13
4️⃣ "Overall, changes in G6solar & #G6sulfur from SSP5-8.5 with respect to surface temperature, wind speed, and downwelling #SolarFlux at the surface are positively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire carbon emissions,....
7/13
Cont'd....
whereas their changes in precipitation, relative humidity, and soil water content are negatively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire #CarbonEmissions."
8/13
5️⃣ "Generally, the #StratosphericSulfateAerosols approach has a stronger fire-reducing effect than the #SolarIrradianceReduction approach. The impacts of the analyzed variable changes are generally larger (percent-wise) on burned area than fire carbon emissions."
9/13
6️⃣ "#Geoengineering-imposed reductions in surface temperature & wind speed & geoengineering-imposed increases in relative humidity & soil moisture reduce fires by the end of the century."
10/13
Cont'd...
"However, the reduction in precipitation resulting from #geoengineering offsets its overall fire-reducing effect to some extent."
11/13
Read open-access paper entitled: "Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6" here ⬇️ acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/54…
🚨Can land-based and ocean-based #CarbonRemoval work together, without undermining each other?
A new Earth system modeling study shows that combining BECCS & OAE delivers near-additive CO₂ removal, cutting ~23 ppm by 2100, while exposing critical Earth-system feedbacks.
🧵1/11
2/ As emissions cuts lag, most 1.5–2°C pathways now rely on carbon dioxide removal.
But the real question isn’t which CDR method is best, it’s what happens when multiple CDR approaches are deployed together inside the real climate system.
3/ To answer this, researchers used the Norwegian Earth System Model, simulating the period from 2030 to 2100 under an overshoot scenario where CO₂ first rises, then falls into net-negative territory.
This allowed them to track long-term land, ocean, and atm responses.
🚨'Rock candy' technique offers simpler, less costly way to capture C directly from air
U of Toronto engineers have developed a cheap, passive, string-based #DAC system that crystallizes CO₂ like “rock candy,” potentially cutting capital costs by up to 40%.
How it works🧵1/11
Direct air capture has existed for decades, but it’s expensive. Giant fans, complex chemical plants, and energy-intensive regeneration steps drive up costs. That’s the main criticism of today’s DAC industry.
U of Toronto researchers tackled the problem with a simple question:
What if we could let nature do most of the work?
Their answer: evaporative carbonate crystallization, a passive, wind-powered approach.
🚨🗞️Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (November Edition)
From the U.S. stratospheric-cooling patent to Global South funding, cautious UK–EU stances, tipping-point modeling & a surge in chemtrail chatter, #SRM captured global attention.
Top 10 SRM Highlights (Nov 2025)🧵1/6:
➡️@MakeSunsets secures its first US patent for stratospheric cooling tech
➡️Climate scientists remain skeptical of SRM, favor research over deployment, per @SZ (Garman newspaper) survey
➡️Royal Society sees SRM’s potential but stresses it can't solve climate change alone
🧵2/
➡️London Protocol reiterates precaution on marine geoengineering deployment
➡️UK reiterates it is “not in favor” of SRM deployment but open to debating regulation
➡️Studies warn SAI may cut protein in staple crops & destabilize yields for coffee, cacao & wine
🚨A new modeling study finds Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (#SAI) could lower risks to many of Earth’s #TippingPoints, but not all.
High-latitude deployment best protects ice sheets & permafrost, while low-latitude deployment favors rainforests & coral reefs.
DETAILS🧵1/14
2/ Tipping elements are highly sensitive to warming.
This study analyzes how different SAI designs (equatorial, mid-latitude, high-latitude & multi-objective strategy) influence the drivers of these tipping systems under SSP2-4.5.
3/ Across most tipping elements, SAI decreases risk relative to continued warming, but magnitude & direction of response are strongly pattern-dependent.
CO₂-driven warming & SAI-driven cooling aren't climatic mirror images - SAI can over- or under-compensate regional changes
🚨New study reveals a major hidden C sink in the deep ocean: ancient talus breccias - piles of broken basalt formed along seafloor faults - can trap & store CO₂ for tens of millions of years, potentially offsetting a significant share of mid-ocean ridge emissions.
DETAILS🧵1/10
2/ Researchers made the discovery while drilling 60-million-year-old seafloor in the South Atlantic.
They found talus breccias containing ~7.5 wt% CO₂ - the highest carbon content ever measured in upper ocean crust, up to *40 times richer than previously sampled basalts.
3/ Why so much C?
These breccias form when steep faults at slow-spreading ridges collapse, creating piles of fractured rock with high natural porosity (~19%).
Over millions of yrs, cold seawater circulates thru rubble & precipitates carbonate minerals, trapping dissolved CO₂
🚨Soil food webs boost carbon retention in farmlands
A new study reveals that simply returning crop residues to fields can supercharge soil food webs, enabling microbes, nematodes & fungi to lock significantly more photosynthetic C into farmland soils.
Details🧵1/8 #CarbonSink
2/ Researchers from the Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), used field trials and ¹³C isotope tracing to map how carbon fixed by crops travels into soil and through the soil food web.
3/ FINDINGS:
Returning crop residues (stover) emerged as a key driver:
It increased particulate organic carbon (POC) by ~30.96% & mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) by ~11.39% compared with plots where stover was removed.