Geoengineering Info Profile picture
May 17, 2023 13 tweets 8 min read Read on X
🚨NEW STUDY🚨

Recent research analyzed "future wildfires burned areas & C emissions under #SolarGeoengineering & Shared Socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) scenarios & assessed how the different geoengineering approaches impact #fires."

Results are discussed in a 🧵 below ⬇️:
1/13 Image
The major conclusions and implications drawn from this study are as follows:
2/13
1️⃣ "The global total #wildfire burned A is projected to rise under the unmitigated scenario (SSP5-8.5) & drop under the 2 #geoengineering scenarios (#SolarIrradianceReduction & #StratosphericSulfateAerosols) based on a comparison of the averages of 2091–2100 as to 2021–2030."
3/ Image
2️⃣ "By the end of the century, the two #geoengineering scenarios exhibit lower burned area and fire carbon emissions than not only their base-forcing scenario (SSP5-8.5) but also the targeted-forcing scenario (SSP2-4.5)."
4/13 Image
3️⃣ "The 2 #geoengineering approaches (#SolarIrradianceReduction & #StratosphericSulfateAerosols) generally lead to less wildfire activity in most regions in 2091–2100, except for Northern Hemisphere Africa & equatorial Asia."
5/13 Image
Cont'd....
"The 40–70∘ N latitude band is the only latitude band in which the zonal mean burned area consistently increases under all of the scenarios, even the #geoengineering scenarios."
6/13
4️⃣ "Overall, changes in G6solar & #G6sulfur from SSP5-8.5 with respect to surface temperature, wind speed, and downwelling #SolarFlux at the surface are positively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire carbon emissions,....
7/13 ImageImage
Cont'd....
whereas their changes in precipitation, relative humidity, and soil water content are negatively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire #CarbonEmissions."
8/13 Image
5️⃣ "Generally, the #StratosphericSulfateAerosols approach has a stronger fire-reducing effect than the #SolarIrradianceReduction approach. The impacts of the analyzed variable changes are generally larger (percent-wise) on burned area than fire carbon emissions."
9/13 Image
6️⃣ "#Geoengineering-imposed reductions in surface temperature & wind speed & geoengineering-imposed increases in relative humidity & soil moisture reduce fires by the end of the century."
10/13
Cont'd...
"However, the reduction in precipitation resulting from #geoengineering offsets its overall fire-reducing effect to some extent."
11/13
Read open-access paper entitled: "Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6" here ⬇️
acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/54…

#SolarGeoengineering
#Wildfires
#StratosphericSulfateAerosol
#SolarIrradianceReduction

12/13

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Geoengineering Info

Geoengineering Info Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @geoengineering1

Sep 12
🚨New Viewpoint published in Frontiers that responds to Siegert et al.’s paper.

While Siegert et al. warn against polar #geoengineering, Moore et al. argue for a compassionate harm-reduction paradigm, keeping geoengineering research open alongside decarbonization.

Details🧵1/12 Image
2/ Siegert et al. [] critically assessed polar geoengineering proposals, urging restraint.

Their case: interventions are risky, may not work, and could distract from the essential task which is deep decarbonization.frontiersin.org/journals/scien…
3/ Moore et al. [] reply that this “consequences-based paradigm” (raising alarms to spur action), has dominated climate science for 50 years.

Yet emissions remain high, tipping points loom, and Arctic ice is collapsing.frontiersin.org/journals/scien…
Read 13 tweets
Sep 10
🚨New Nature Geoscience study shows that blooms of Phaeocystis antarctica (microalgae) in the Southern Ocean ~14,000 yrs ago massively drew down CO₂, stabilizing climate. Their decline today could have global consequences.
#CarbonSink #CarbonDrawdown

Details🧵1/9 Image
2/ Microalgae are pivotal in the Southern Ocean carbon cycle.

A new study from the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) reveals that during the Antarctic Cold Reversal (14.7–12.7k yrs BP), algal blooms slowed the rise of atmospheric CO₂. Image
3/ At the end of the last ice age, the Antarctic Cold Reversal brought vast winter sea ice followed by strong spring melt.

These unique conditions fueled Phaeocystis antarctica blooms, exceptionally efficient at capturing and exporting carbon. Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 5
🚨New study finds #SolarGeoengineering methods have divergent hydrological outcomes in China.

Only equatorial Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (#SAI) could mitigate the “North-Drought, South-Flood” pattern, while MCB & CCT risk worsening it.

DETAILS🧵1/11 Image
2/ China’s hydroclimate is long shaped by the NDSF pattern: aridity in the north, flooding in the south.

Warming threatens to intensify this divide via glacier retreat and stronger monsoon variability.

How would climate interventions alter this? Image
3/ Zhang et al. tested three SRM strategies:

• SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection)
• MCB (Marine Cloud Brightening)
• CCT (Cirrus Cloud Thinning)

All benchmarked against high-emissions (RCP8.5) & moderate mitigation (RCP4.5).
Read 12 tweets
Sep 2
🚨Researchers at the KAIST and the @MIT have developed a new fiber-based material that can capture CO2 directly from the air using only small amounts of electricity, potentially lowering the barriers to large-scale deployment of direct air capture (#DAC) technology.

DETAILS🧵1/8 Image
2/ DAC systems, which remove CO2 directly from ambient air, have long been hindered by their high energy requirements.

With atm CO₂ concentrations at less than 400ppm, vast volumes of air must be processed, typically requiring large amounts of heat.
3/ The joint team, led by Professor Ko Dong-yeon of KAIST & Professor T. Alan Hatton of MIT, overcame this limitation by designing an electrically conductive fiber adsorbent (ethylenediamine EDA-Y zeolite/cellulose acetate (CA) fiber) that heats itself through Joule heating. Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 31
📝💡𝐖𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐥𝐲 𝐂𝐃𝐑 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬💡📝

📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (25 August - 31 August 2025):

🔗:

🧵0/20
Frontier signed a $31.3M deal with Planetary to scale ocean alkalinity enhancement, aiming to remove 115,211 tCO₂ at $270/t from 2026–2030.


1/20frontierclimate.com/writing/planet…
Biochar platform Terraton raised $11.5 million seed funding led by Lowercarbon Capital and Gigascale Capital.


2/20reuters.com/press-releases…
Read 22 tweets
Aug 27
🚨In a new study published in @OneEarth_CP, researchers reveal that human land activities have stripped away roughly 24% of terrestrial carbon stocks (equivalent to 344 billion metric tons of C), underscoring an urgent need to reframe land-use & climate policy.

Details🧵1/10 Image
2/ Plants + soils store more carbon than the atmosphere + all fossil reserves combined.

But farming, grazing, and forest use have stripped away this natural shield, turning land from a carbon bank into a carbon source.
3/ Researchers call this loss the terrestrial carbon deficit - the gap between what ecosystems could hold (‘potential’) vs. what they actually hold (‘actual’).

The shortfall? 344 PgC (24% of natural stocks). Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(