Recent research analyzed "future wildfires burned areas & C emissions under #SolarGeoengineering & Shared Socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) scenarios & assessed how the different geoengineering approaches impact #fires."
Results are discussed in a 🧵 below ⬇️:
1/13
The major conclusions and implications drawn from this study are as follows:
2/13
2️⃣ "By the end of the century, the two #geoengineering scenarios exhibit lower burned area and fire carbon emissions than not only their base-forcing scenario (SSP5-8.5) but also the targeted-forcing scenario (SSP2-4.5)."
4/13
Cont'd....
"The 40–70∘ N latitude band is the only latitude band in which the zonal mean burned area consistently increases under all of the scenarios, even the #geoengineering scenarios."
6/13
4️⃣ "Overall, changes in G6solar & #G6sulfur from SSP5-8.5 with respect to surface temperature, wind speed, and downwelling #SolarFlux at the surface are positively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire carbon emissions,....
7/13
Cont'd....
whereas their changes in precipitation, relative humidity, and soil water content are negatively correlated to the changes in burned area and fire #CarbonEmissions."
8/13
5️⃣ "Generally, the #StratosphericSulfateAerosols approach has a stronger fire-reducing effect than the #SolarIrradianceReduction approach. The impacts of the analyzed variable changes are generally larger (percent-wise) on burned area than fire carbon emissions."
9/13
6️⃣ "#Geoengineering-imposed reductions in surface temperature & wind speed & geoengineering-imposed increases in relative humidity & soil moisture reduce fires by the end of the century."
10/13
Cont'd...
"However, the reduction in precipitation resulting from #geoengineering offsets its overall fire-reducing effect to some extent."
11/13
Read open-access paper entitled: "Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6" here ⬇️ acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/54…
"Geoengineering isn't just a climate issue—it's a geopolitical chess game. Only US & China have power to unilaterally deploy #SAI at scale."
Will they race to control skies or seek climate diplomacy? New study explores 4 futures🧵1/9
2/ SAI could cool the planet—but who controls it controls global climate security.
Key risks of unilateral deployment:
🔴 Termination shock
🔴 Environmental disruptions
🔴 SAI as a potential weapon
🔴 Geopolitical leverage—both a threat & opportunity
3/ This creates a security gap:
The US & China are locked in great power competition, yet neither has a clear strategy on SAI.
Who moves first? Who controls the stratosphere? The dilemma: Deploy & gain influence—or deter & risk falling behind?
📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (17 February - 23 February 2025):
🔗:
🧵0/19
@Arcaclimate has secured $12.2 million from Australian venture capital firms Side Stage Ventures and Saniel Ventures to help scale its carbon removal technology at Western Australian mine sites.
Qualterra, a company that converts organic waste into biochar for soil health and carbon sequestration, secured $4.5M to expand biochar production, launch carbon credits, and scale plant propagation.
🚨What if we could remove methane from the atmosphere—fast?🚨
A new study proposes two ways to use 𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐡𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 to destroy this powerful GHG: one with reactors, the other by releasing chlorine into the air. But one of these ideas comes with serious risks:🧵1/10
2/ Methane is a powerful but short-lived greenhouse gas, responsible for ~0.5°C of global warming. "It’s 80x more potent than CO₂ over 20 years," and its atmospheric levels continue to rise—despite global pledges to cut emissions.
3/ In nature, hydroxyl (OH) radicals break down methane, but the process is slow.
Chlorine (Cl) radicals can do the same job 16x faster, though they are far less abundant in atm—destroying only ~1-4% of methane today.
🚨🐺Scotland’s lost forests could rise again with the help of wolves🐺🚨
A new study finds that reintroducing these apex predators in the Scottish Highlands could restore wild woodlands & capture 𝟏 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐎₂ 𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 (#CDR). Here’s how:🧵1/7
2/ The Scottish Highlands were once a land of towering pines and roaming wolves. But 250 years ago, wolves vanished—and with them, nature’s balance. Red deer, left unchecked, now number 400,000, grazing young trees before they can take root.
3/ Researchers modeled what would happen if wolves returned to the Cairngorms, the Central Highlands, and beyond.
Their findings? 167 wolves could reduce deer numbers enough for forests to regrow naturally—on a vast scale.