Again, @TwitterSafety fails to uphold its own standards/policies. Consistency is crucial, & silencing people because of who demands it, is contrary to everything Elon Musk claims to stand for.
Twitter suspended @RosePinochet after a request by activists. Twitter told the user they’re suspended for violent speech, citing posts which did not contain ANY such violation.
@TwitterSafety then told the leftist activists that it was violating the abusive behavior rule.
They suspended, THEN found the reason. In addition to the user’s appeal regarding the absurd “violent speech” claim, it’s also CLEAR she didn’t violate the abusive behavior policy.
As cited, @elonmusk further clarified that such violations would need to be “over-the-top.” That’s still only to have the post “bounced” as opposed to account level moderation action.
@RosePinochet’s posts were substantive & contextually relevant, & we’re NOT violative.
Permanent suspensions are supposed to be LIMITED to very specific severe violations types, which is why the TRIED to cite the “targeted harassment” rule.
Given the policy cited above, @RosePinochet was CLEARLY not in violation. Her posts adhere to EVERY aspect of this policy.
We got banned for challenging the George Floyd narrative. Now we can tell the truth. 🧵
#JordanNeely was a mentally ill & very dangerous homeless man. The media will portray him as they did with other black men, who’s deaths were largely the result of their criminal conduct.
The media & politicians are at it again. He was “lynched” because he was having a “mental health crisis” they say.
“New York wasn’t safe for him” & “it was a lynching” are the type of refrain we have, in between the childhood photos & stories of his Michael Jackson fandom.
The reality isn’t that simple. In fact, this outcome, while unfortunate, is entirely acceptable, & his killer(s) certainly don’t deserve the criminal convictions almost certainly headed their way.
That is the real tragedy. Before you feign outrage, I’ll explain just why that is.
Omg I could argue this better! Bruen is the controlling standard on the presumption of constitutionality!
YES NO FUNCTIONAL HANDGUN IN COMMON USE CAN BE BANNED! COME ON!
If you’re not listening to oral arguments you have no idea what I’m talking about. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
MA has an approved firearm roster for handguns. All handguns not approved are banned (besides private sale). Heller allows for potentially dangerous guns to be restricted. But they’re not dangerous and unusual if they’re in common use throughout other states.
Now the state is going to argue it’s not a ban, but regulation because it doesn’t impact individual rights to carry a firearm, since we can buy them privately. Essentially retail stores can’t sell them, but private sales can. That’s nonsensical.
I can’t believe how brainwashed people are on Ukraine. It’s really nuts. You guys know it’s possible to simultaneously believe Putin is a dictator and shouldn’t have gone into Ukraine, while also recognizing it not our fight and we largely caused it, right?
Ukraine has murdered an unarmed woman and now an unarmed man in public bombings in Russia. That’s a terrorist attack and war crime to assassinate a non-combatant.
And nobody thinks that’s probably not good? Because the victims talked smack about Ukraine on TV and blogs? Wtf is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
So these people would also agree with the statement that “9/11 was just part of war. If the US didn’t attack muslim countries, it wouldn’t have happened!”