At the time of writing, there are 12k+ tokens minted with the BRC-20 standard, most of which are memecoins like $PEPE & $MEME.
But how did this all start?
4/ BRC-20 is an experimental token standard inspired by ERC-20, but it works very differently.
It was created in March by @domodata, an on-chain analyst who enables the creation & transfer of fungible tokens on the Bitcoin blockchain using the Ordinals protocol.
5/ 🎯 How does it work?
At their core BRC-20 tokens are essentially specially marked sats (satoshis, the smallest divisible unit of Bitcoin).
Each BRC-20 token is a sat that has been inscribed to belong to a specific BRC-20 "collection" (i.e. the ticker/type of BRC-20).
6/ Inscriptions are a newly invented way of storing data in the $BTC blockchain, that relies on each satoshi of the 2.1 quadrillion maximum sats of Bitcoin having a unique identifier.
Before BRC-20, they've been used to create "NFTs" on Bitcoin by inscribing images onto sats.
7/ BRC-20 tokens are essentially ordinal inscriptions with text embedded, providing a set of specs for minting and managing tokens.
Developers use ordinal inscriptions of JSON data to deploy token contracts, mint tokens (by inscribing existing Bitcoin), and transfer them.
8/ Thus, think of BRC-20 tokens as specially marked sats.
Because they're *literally* native Bitcoins, they do not, and can not, use fully expressive smart contracts at the L1 layer of Bitcoin.
Using them in expressive smart contracts requires an L2, but more on that later.
9/ Additionally, BRC-20 tokens require a Bitcoin wallet like @unisat_wallet (or soon @xverseApp) to mint and send.
The BRC-20 frenzy has caused the number of token transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain to surpass regular BTC transactions by over 50%!
10/ 🎯 Importance and Criticisms of BRC20
The rise of BRC-20 tokens demonstrates the versatility of the Bitcoin blockchain, reshaping what we (devs/investors) believed to be possible.
It also shows how evolving & adaptive this space can be to new trends.
11/ BRC-20 tokens are an exciting idea, but currently have a lot of meme coin and speculation - not unlike ERC-20 tokens, legit use cases will come with time.
Even @domodata (their creator) thinks BRC-20s will be "worthless". For now, though, the total market cap is above $170M.
12/ BRC-20s on their own don't bring smart contract-capable tokens to Bitcoin, whereas ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum do
Due to the limitations of Bitcoin, use cases beyond relatively simple transfers need a Bitcoin L2 like @Stacks or a protocol on top of Bitcoin like @TrustlessOnBTC
13/ For better or worse, BRC-20s are increasing competition for limited block space, boxing out low-fee transactions like securing cold storage funds or creating lightning channels.
This is likely to continue as builders push the limits of Taproot transactions.
15/ And @ALEXLabBTC very quickly built and released a fully featured DEX and bridge for trading BRC-20s after bridging them from Bitcoin L1 to Bitcoin L2 @Stacks.
And announced the world's first BRC-20 IDO launchpad.
16/16 It remains to be seen if tokens on Bitcoin L1 make more sense than tokens on smart contract-capable protocols on top of Bitcoin (like L2s), but they're a great example of the renaissance of Bitcoin innovation.
But staked $ETH can't be used for anything once staked.
@LidoFinance stETH, a liquid staking derivative that issues wrapped assets representing the staked $ETH, addressed this inefficiency.
3/ Despite this development, Layer-2 networks, oracle networks, and other validators still face the challenge of re-using staked capital to secure other networks.
1/ The long awaited $sBTC whitepaper just dropped.
Nothing can beat a firsthand read of the paper yourself, but having read through the whole thing, here are a few key takeaways and topics to focus on:
2/ Trustlessly using native #Bitcoin for smart contract applications (dApps, DeFi, etc) has remained an elusive "holy grail".
The fundamental challenge is Bitcoin itself is not programmable. Some may say this is a flaw in Bitcoin, while others believe this is a core strength.
3/ The ethos in the @Stacks ecosystem is to extend #Bitcoin functionality, and leverage its security as the most secure base settlement layer, without modifying or altering Bitcoin itself.
In fact, any tokenized asset is difficult to keep pegged to its underlying value. (Stable coins are really just a subset of tokenized assets - tokenized fiat USD)
Here's why tokenizing assets (of any kind) is a challenge...
🧵
Let's start with tokenized fiat USD, ie stable coins.
The most *direct* way to tokenize USD is to have a bank account of actual USD, and issue a stable coin like $USDC that is 1:1 matched to USD held in a centralized, traditional bank account.
Obviously this has issues...
Which is why so many DeFi protocols have attempted fully on chain, decentralized, algorithmic stable coins.
This shifts the problem - if not backed 1:1 by literal USD sitting in a vault, what are the stable coins backed by?