#DelhiHighCourt hearing a plea by TMC Leader Anubrata Mondal's daughter Sukanya Mondal in the money laundering case registered by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) in connection with the multi- crore Cattle Smuggling Case. #CattleSmuggling#AnubrataMondal#SukanyaMondal
Counsel appearing for Sukanya Mondal submits that it's a quashing petition, seeking the quashing of the ED complaint as well as consequential proceedings. #DelhiHighCourt#CattleSmuggling#sukanyamondal
Counsel: On the basis of My Lord! primarily on one ground. My case is squarely covered under one Judgment of the #SupremeCourt, in Vijay MadanLal Mohan lal Choudhary which says, that if the accused is not involved for the predicate offence..cannot be involved in the scheduled… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Counsel: Reads portions of the Vijay MadanLal Judgment, "...Any person on a notional basis or assumption that a scheduled offence has been committed unless it is so registered with the jurisdictional police...." #DelhiHighCourt#CattleSmuggling#sukanyamondal
Counsel: For prosecuting money laundering as per Section 3 of PMLA, i have to be accused of the scheduled offence. Second on the ground of jurisdiction they(ED) lodge ECIR in Calcutta.
Counsel appearing for ED: Her bail is pending before the Trial Court which is scheduled for May 26.
The court notes that the counsel for petitioner seeks time to make submissions in the matter on the point of maintainability.
Accordingly, the matter will be taken up next on… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Vacation Bench of #SupremeCourtofIndia to hear appeal filed by Trinamool Congress MP #AbhishekBanerjee against Calcutta High Court's order passed in the teacher’s recruitment scam case allowing CBI and ED to question him.
Senior Advocate AM Singhvi appears on behalf of Banerjee.
Singhvi: There are three orders I want the bench to see. The order of April 24..
SC: All this is over, I have seen every document. After this court's order, the CJ changed the bench. High Court has said that it cannot… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Singhvi: How can court say this is res judicata..
SC: The order is a very balanced one, the court considered your arguments and then rejected them..
Singhvi: Your lordships directed a de novo hearing, on what has gone before.. remember the origin of this matter.. this man is… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#BREAKING: #DelhiHighCourt dismisses pleas moved by Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Wadra, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and other charitable trusts challenging the IT authorities' decision to transfer their tax assessments to the central circle. #IncomeTax#RahulGandhi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
While dismissing the petition a division bench comprising Justice Manmohan and Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma observed that transfer was in accordance with law.
The bench also clarified that it did not examine the matter on merits. #IncomeTax#RahulGandhi#SoniaGandhi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The bench said that the parties are free to raise their contentions before the appropriate statutory authority and that the transfer of their assessment to the Central Circle was for a coordinated investigation.
#JustIn: A criminal complaint has been filed before the Patiala House Court, Delhi against wrestlers Vinesh Phogat, Bajrang Phogat and Sakshi Malik for pressing "false allegations" of sexual harassment on the then President of WFI, Brijbhushan Sharan Singh and for "Hate Speech"… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The plea states that the allegations made by the accused persons against Brijbhushan Sharan Singh are FALSE and connected with DIRECT OR INDIRECT way by any INFLUENCE AND PERSONAL GAIN. #DelhiCourt#wfi#wfiprotest#wrestlers
"The Accused persons are well-known wrestlers who also play international tournaments and any one of them are not physically weak or poor to oppose the alleged offence. So, it is hard to believe that they were harassed by a 66 year old man (Brijbhushan Sharan Singh). #DelhiCourt… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Author Anand Ranganathan (@ARanganathan72 ) to appear before the #DelhiHighCourt to tender his unconditional apology in the suo-motu criminal contempt case initiated against him in connection with relief provided by Justice S. Muralidhar to UAPA-accused Gautam Navlakha.