First, let’s review why the loss of #reprorights puts women's health at risk. Here are the stats on maternal mortality in the US compared to other industrialized nations.
This is inexcusable.
2/x
Digging deeper into the data reveals enormous inequities. Black women have 3 times the maternal mortality rate as white women. As do Native American women, women with diabetes, CVD, and obesity.
3/x
What does this have to do with abortion bans?
Put simply, pregnancy is far riskier than abortion. And much riskier for some women.
A recent study showed that a national ban would increase maternal mortality by 24% with the highest increase among Black women (39%).
4/X
Many women in the US no longer have the ability to weigh their options.
Making matters worse, there is a coordinated effort to misinform women about the risks of pregnancy and abortion. It isn't new but it is intensifying rapidly.
This is officially an infodemic.
We need all hands on deck. This playbook will not stop at abortion.
6/x
The @WHO defines an infodemic as when false or misleading information in digital and physical environments causes confusion, risky behaviors, and mistrust in health authorities.
We saw misinformation wreak havoc during the pandemic.
7/x
Abortion misinformation has been circulating for decades. TX and FL funnel 100’s of millions of taxpayer $ into “crisis pregnancy centers” which are Christian-run centers that use disinformation to dissuade women from terminating unwanted pregnancies. 8/x nbcnews.com/politics/supre…
There are >2,500 crisis pregnancy centers across the US, they outnumber abortion clinics 3 to 1, a ratio that is only getting wider as abortion clinics are shuttering in more than half the US states.
These clinics are literally tax payer-funded disinformation engines.
9/x
One study found that 80% of websites for crisis pregnancy centers contained misinformation, usually lies about risks of abortion.
Disinformation is the cornerstone of the antiabortion playbook.
What makes the abortion infodemic unique is it's coupled with legislative efforts that restrict access to accurate health information.
This poses significant obstacles to reaching women with accurate health information to inform their care decisions.
Some examples…
11/x
Texas Republicans have introduced legislation that would force internet providers to block the entire state from websites that provide info on obtaining an abortion.
In Mississippi, the attorney general is going after @HealthMayday a company that puts up billboards and TV ads informing women on how to obtain an abortion.
Banning abortion information is consistent w/ Republican lawmaker's efforts to ban books, silence teachers & restrict curriculums.
Their “free speech” branding is to distract from their efforts to control the narrative by banning any information they don’t like. 16/x
Well, many women insist on being heard. 👏
They’re sharing horror stories emanating from how abortion bans resulted in crucial care being withheld. A recent report by @DrDGrossman is tracking these cases. This is a must read.
The architects of abortion bans are now taking advantage of the confusion they have sowed by blaming doctors for the harm brought upon patients by abortion bans.
They are actually advising women to sue their doctors.
It is of paramount importance that we develop a playbook for mitigating infodemics that are accompanied by laws that restrict access to accurate health information.
The precedents being set here are alarming. What if it becomes illegal for doctors to recommend vaccines?
19/x
The other unique and concerning feature of the abortion infodemic is what I would characterize as 'bystander apathy.'
This is the tendency of bystanders in stressful or life-threatening situations to not react or intervene.
20/x
We hear the news. We hear the stories. We hear the lies. But the public’s reaction is surprisingly tepid.
3 factors facilitate bystander apathy:
First is diffusion of responsibility which is the tendency to think “I’m sure someone is doing something so I won’t bother.” 21/x
The second factor facilitating apathy is fear of unfavorable judgement. Have you noticed how uncomfortable it is for people to even say the word ‘abortion?'
The hostile environment has a silencing effect on people who could help. That's part of the antiabortion playbook.
22/x
The third factor affecting bystander apathy is pluralistic ignorance which is the perception that because nobody is saying or doing much, the situation must not actually be that big of a deal.
23/x
We’re in a huge mess and many lives will be lost.
Children will lose their mothers.
Spouses will lose their wives.
We have to decide if we are going to look away or act to prevent that from happening.
24/x
The usefulness of GRE and GPA for grad school entry is heavily debated for good reason. Poor predictors of success!
I find that the most important characteristic of a candidate is actually none of these. It is COACHABILITY.
Here is why and what coachability is and isn’t. 1/x
Why coachability? People who are coachable easily overcome lack of experience simply because they are so highly motivated to learn.
Hands down, I would rather someone who is highly coachable with meh GRE scores than someone who is meh coachable and stellar GRE. 2/x
One characteristic of a coachable person is they are 100% aware that they don’t know what they don’t know. In other words, they are aware they have blind spots and are highly motivated to fill in those blind spots. 3/x
I teach a grad course on clinical trial methodology for behavioral interventions.
If this is a topic you’d like to learn more about, here are the main take homes from my class (with recommended readings!) in a thread! 🧵
Here goes! 1/x
First, you must understand the phases of behavioral intervention development and testing. I can’t tell you how much I see these phases confused in grant applications and papers.
Next, intervention development starts with a conceptual model that delineates the key drivers of the behavior you are targeting. To understand those drivers, your assignment is to delve into the basic behavioral science and observational study literature on the topic. 3/x
To learn how we can make Fall semester better, we asked students (n=60) what professors did when spring courses went online that showed they CARE about their students.
A very popular response was professor accessibility via frequent office hours and email made students feel cared for. Quick responses and lots of opportunities to connect were very appreciated. 2/x
Next, students appreciated professor flexibility and relaxing of certain course policies (e.g., grading, deadlines, test taking procedures). Being at home made their schedules more chaotic and brought up new challenges. Flexibility helped make it work and eased the stress. 3/x
College students return to campus in a few weeks. We wanted to know their thoughts about quarantine, symptom tracking, contact tracing, and mask wearing on campus, so my grad student @laurie_groshon and I did focus groups to find out.
Here’s what students told us
1/x
First, we asked them about the required 14 day quarantine before the semester starts. Every student we asked said that this is not realistic and will likely fail. 😳
2/x
They pointed out that students are eager to see each other and will find a way to do so when they arrive on campus. They said that students who live 1-2 hours away will try to find a way to go home. They said off campus students will likely find their way on campus. 😬
3/x
I’m seeing a lot of talk about the role of “personal responsibility” in behavior (& behavioral interventions).
The idea is that if people just took more “responsibility” they would be doing the things we think they should be doing.
This thinking is a dead end.
A thread
1/x
If a person exercises regularly or wears a mask, one might conclude this person has taken “personal responsibility.” But personal responsibility doesn’t actually explain ❓why❓ a behavior has occurred.
It is simply a subjective judgment about one’s character.
2/x
To gain an understanding of why a behavior is occurring we instead need to examine the contextual factors that cue and reinforce the behavior for that individual, both at present and in their past.
3/x
A THREAD (AND AN OFFER!) for front line doc and nurse researchers! 😷🩺🩹
FRONT LINERS: Was your plan to submit an NIH grant interrupted by #covid19?
We want to help YOU for helping us. 🙏1/x
We appreciate your 100% clinic commitment 💜and want to help the research stay alive! 💪
THE DEAL: A team of NIH-funded researchers has offered to provide volunteer peer reviews of your R or K proposal drafts you intended (or still intend) to submit on the next NIH deadline. 2/x
How will this work?
I will match you and your proposal to a volunteer reviewer who will give you comments and feedback just like an NIH reviewer would. 3/x