🚨NEW STUDY🚨
“Given the high expectations placed on #DAC for future #decarbonisation, recent study presents an extensive review of DAC tech, exploring a number of techno-economic aspects, including an updated collection of the current & planned DAC projects around the world.”
🧵
“A dedicated analysis focused on the production of synthetic methane, methanol, and diesel from #DAC and electrolytic hydrogen in the European Union (EU) is also performed, where the #carbonfootprint is analysed for different scenarios and energy sources.”
2/10
The results show that “the maximum grid carbon intensity to obtain #NegativeEmissions with #DAC is estimated at 468 gCO 2 e/kWh, which is compliant with most of the EU countries’ current grid mix.”
3/10
“Using only photovoltaics (PV) and wind, #NegativeEmissions of at least −0.81 tCO 2 e/tCO 2 captured can be achieved.”
4/10
“The maximum grid intensities allowing a reduction of the synthetic fuels carbon footprint compared with their fossil-fuels counterparts range btw 96 & 151 gCO 2 e/kWh.”
5/10
However, “to comply with the Renewable Energy Directive II (REDII) sustainability criteria to produce renewable fuels of non-biological origin, the maximum stays between 30.2 to 38.8 gCO 2 e/kWh.”
6/10
“Only when using PV and wind is the EU average able to comply with the REDII threshold for all scenarios and fuels, with fuel emissions ranging from 19.3 to 25.8 gCO 2 e/MJ.”
7/10
These results highlight the “importance of using renewable energies for the production of synthetic fuels compliant with the EU regulations that can help reduce emissions from difficult-to-decarbonise sectors.”
8/10
Read the paper entitled: "The Role of Direct Air Capture in EU’s Decarbonisation and Associated Carbon Intensity for Synthetic Fuels Production" here ⬇️ econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjen…
A new paper suggests detonating an absolutely gigantic nuclear bomb (1,600x bigger than Tsar Bomba) deep beneath the seabed to accelerate carbon removal (#CDR).
A thread on this bold climate proposal:🧵1/11
2/ Climate change is an existential threat, which is why some researchers explore extreme solutions. This one might be one of them.
The idea? Use a nuclear bomb to shatter massive amounts of basalt, speeding up Enhanced Rock Weathering (#ERW)—a natural carbon capture process.
3/ ERW works because rocks like basalt react with CO₂, locking it away in mineral form. Scientists have suggested that crushing basalt into fine particles accelerates this process. "But even when optimized, ERW is slow & limited in scale." That’s where the nuclear bomb comes in
Silvania, backed by Mercuria, teams up with Conservation International and The Nature Conservancy on the "Race to Belém" initiative, aiming to raise $1.5 billion to generate carbon credits for Amazon rainforest preservation.
🚨PAPER—The Arctic’s frozen ground, permafrost, holds massive reserves of ancient carbon. As the planet warms, this carbon faces a dangerous release into the atm, accelerating climate change. Could solar geoengineering (#SRM) help save it? The answer is complex.
DETAILS🧵 1/7
2/7 Permafrost is warming faster than the global average, poised to unleash C stored for millennia. This creates a feedback loop—warming leads to more C release, which leads to more warming. Simulations show SRM could limit global warming to 1.5°C & slow permafrost thaw. But...
3/7 This research revealed that, at 1.5°C warming, permafrost loss is reduced by about 50% & carbon loss by about 33% due to SRM, compared to a high-emissions future (SSP5-8.5). However, significant losses still occur, even with SRM. By 2300, the damage remains substantial.
📰 Here's your round-up of top #CarbonDioxideRemoval News / Developments from this week (14 January - 19 January 2025):
🔗:
🧵0/22
The US government has awarded $101 million in federal funding for five projects to support the development of CO2 capture, removal and conversion test centers.