Brainy1986 Profile picture
May 26 6 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Supreme Court declared in Dobb’s decision:

1. 14th Amendment didn’t mean WOMEN had rights to Life, Liberty, Property.

2. Abortion NOT a right because NOT enumerated. 9th Amendment states rights MAY NOT BE DENIED because NOT enumerated.

Tell them NO. #VoteBlueNoMatterWho ImageImage
14th Amendment said “ALL PERSONS had right to LIFE, LIBERTY & PROPERTY. But, didn’t mean BLACK men, or WOMEN. We know because they had to pass 15th & 19th Amendments to clarify Blacks/Women = Persons.

TODAY, Supreme Court saying same thing: 14th Amendment doesn’t apply to WOMEN. ImageImage
It is impossible to imagine the SCOTUS could declare 14th Amendment didn’t apply to BLACK men. How is it acceptable they denied it applied to WOMEN?

It IS time that Constitution be AMENDED to INCLUDE 51% of U.S. population.

@SenateGOP @SenateDems @HouseGOP @HouseDemocrats Image
9th Amendment said not all rights need be enumerated to BE rights. 13th Amendment prohibits FORCED BIRTH of blacks for population: does it not apply to white women? 14th Amendment promised STATES could NOT take LIFE, LIBERTY, or PROPERTY: women risk ALL THOSE in childbirth. Image
IF 14th Amendment DOES NOT INCLUDE women as “persons born/naturalized on U.S. soil” with right to “life, liberty, property” then isn’t it HIGH TIME the Constitution be AMENDED? To remove all doubt? IF can remove a woman’s right to LIFE (childbirth inherently risky)—what’s next? ImageImageImage
There are AMERICAN men/women who possess the RELIGIOUS ZEALOTRY of 3rd world nations. Some sit in SCOTUS.

SCOTUS passing legislation due to CHRISTIAN beliefs violates First Amendment: Freedom of Religion.

This is America. And, here? RIGHTS matter.

#VoteBlueNoMatterWho ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brainy1986

Brainy1986 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Brainy1986

May 29
@JordanPoff4 Nice, Jordan. BUT: U.S. in 1787 proposed that SLAVES only count 3 out of 5 slaves for purpose of population that earned representation in government. So if had 15 slaves, the population was 9 total. THEN slavery (not EQUAL) continued til 1865, 13th Amendment….
@JordanPoff4 Slave states STILL chose to treat the blacks badly: so 1866, U.S. passed Civil Rights Act: ALL are equal. And STILL Slave states chose to treat blacks badly. So, 1868-14th Amendment: All equal. And, STILL Slave states treated badly: so 15th Amendment: black men could vote. But…
@JordanPoff4 …not WOMEN (either white or black). Not for 50 YEARS until 1920. And, then…in 2022, the government decided—just like in 1860’s slavery—women could be FORCED by the STATE to bear babies. Today: not just BLACK women: but ALL women could be FORCED by STATE to give birth…
Read 5 tweets
May 29
Did you know that RIGHTS in the CONSTITUTION were “rolled out” separately to various “persons” born on U.S. soil (citizens)? White men: from 1776 to present: no question. Black Men: 1870. White Women: 1920. And, Black Women? Not til 1965. WTF? @SenateDems @HouseDemocrats ImageImageImage
ALL WOMEN need to VOTE BLUE. In Dobb’s Decision, Supreme Court GAVE THE STATE authority to DEPRIVE WOMEN of Life, Liberty, Property & Equal Protection under the law. THIS is 2nd time Supreme Court DENIED women had rights in 14th Amendment: 1st was 1872–when S. B. Anthony voted. ImageImage
The Dobb’s decision is similar to the Dred Scott decision. In Dred Scott, the Supreme Court determined that Congress (federal government) could not prohibit STATES opting to own slaves. In Dobb’s, Suprme Court determined that Congress (federal government) could not…
Read 9 tweets
May 28
Where is the “Equal Protection of the LAW” when women are handed the unwanted baby after being forced to give birth to it? Why aren’t the babies handed to the sperm-shooter? 60 year old married father of 5, Donald Trump didn’t bother to wear a condom with Stormy Daniels. ImageImageImageImage
Supreme Court failed in the Dobb’s decision. NO STATE SHALL DEPRIVE ANY PERSON OF LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS; NOR DENY THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW.

There are no STATE LAWS dictating MEN must have children. Or, # of children (see China’s one-child law). Image
Where was “due process?” In a custody battle between a father and a mother they go to court. A fetus has no legal standing. HOW CAN THE STATE LEGALLY DEPRIVE A WOMAN OF HER OWN BODY/or fetus she’s carrying—albeit ONLY from conception to birth—without due process? @neal_katyal
Read 7 tweets
May 2
@HouseDemocrats @SenateDems @ewarren @BernieSanders @amyklobuchar Rather than RELIGIOUS argument re: abortion—we need a BUDGET argument. FORCING WOMEN to bear children INCREASES POOR PEOPLE and leads to GREATER TAXES on STATE Taxpayer. @MSNBC @washingtonpost @CNNPolitics
How? Absent fathers & women UNABLE to feed/clothe/care for babies = KIDS IN FOSTER CARE, or KIDS living at below poverty level. MEDICAID, Housing, Food subsidies REQUIRED. States OPTING to increase population in foster care: MUST SHOULDER THE EXPENSE: WITHOUT FEDERAL ASSISTANCE.
Example: Texas. 50K abortions in 2021. Now banned. WHAT is the 2023 budget for their HOUSING/MEDICAID/FOOD? Foster care? Adjust number for adopted (5K) = 45K
30K ALREADY in foster care = 75K in care. By 2nd year? 120K. By 3rd year? 165K. Welcome to the FEARED welfare State. Image
Read 13 tweets
May 1
The STATE banning abortion is the LEAST involved in pregnancy/childbirth. YET:
STATES claim OWNERSHIP of the FETUS.
AND:
STATES accept “her giving up” child for adoption WITHOUT PAYING EXPENSES FOR MATERNAL CARE/BIRTH/SURROGACY.

@SenateDems @HouseDemocrats @amyklobuchar ImageImage
Before Slavery/Indentured Servitude PROHIBITED (13th Amendment)—owners PAID EXPENSES (housing, food, medical costs) to gain OWNERSHIP of progeny.

INDENTURED SERVANTS had 7-yr CONTRACTs. Surrogacy & childcare are WORK for STATE without compensation. @SenateDems @HouseDemocrats ImageImageImage
STATES violating 14th Amendment, Section 1, denying 50% of CITIZENS right to LIFE (childbirth inherently deadly).
Why? To GAIN REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS per 14A, Section 2.

Violating 13th Amendment: PROHIBITS slavery & indentured servitude. Surrogacy/Childcare are PAID jobs. ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
Dobbs is a violation of 14th Amendment: right to LIFE (pregnancy/childbirth INHERENTLY risky), LIBERTY (can’t leave infant ALONE), PROPERTY (Child over home). UNEQUAL: men NOT similarly handicapped by STATE. Image
14th Amendment was AMENDED ITSELF—twice. Section 2 gave WHITE MALES right to vote. Required passing 15th Amendment (oops, meant BLACK MALES, too). And 50 YEARS later (ooops, meant FEMALEs, too). Section 1 NOW NEEDS AMENDMENT. Person/Citizen MEANS women, too. Image
The Equal Rights Amendment IS that correction to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Just as the 19th Amendment was necessary to give women the vote, so is the ERA to give women the EQUAL protection of the LAW. That NO State CAN DENY a woman to LIFE, LIBERTY & Property. Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(