I decided I could grumpy tweet disappointing systematic review methods or I could do something different today.
Let's try something different. Let's take you to #SearchingSchool.
A 🧵
There's this called Google where you can search for shit so that you understand it better.
One of the things you might do when embarking on a #systematicreview is, well, first, consult with a librarian, but also try to understand some resources.
If you ARE NOT GOING TO WORK WITH A LIBRARIAN, if one is not available, or if you'd rather just do it on your own, I'd strongly suggest understanding subject headings, which are necessary depending on the resource:
Oops - correct link for syntax, spelling, and line numbers:
Also, for #evidencesynthesis#systematicreviews you should be including a full, comprehensive, transparent, and reproducible search for all databases/platforms in your supplementary material.
This is becoming my default review template (#SysRev or otherwise) -- lots of links because I want people to have all the resources at their fingertips. You can't say I didn't warn you. #systematicreview#knowbeforeyougo
Well howdy do, it's Friday, let me just give you those links, eh?
PRISMA Statement -- a reporting guideline and checklist for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: