🧵1/There is a large, multilingual astroturfing effort around #Cop28 on Twitter right now involving at least 100 fake accounts. The accounts in question are promoting UAE foreign policy, bashing UAE's enemies, and burnishing the UAE's environmental record #deception#greenwashing
2/ Many use stolen photos - either stock photos or those found on the web. They have fully fleshed out bios, including location (usually somewhere in the UAE). Another common tactic is to tag real accounts like @amnesty in the bio to give an air of credibility and plausibility.
3/ For example. Yael Fadel is a space scientist from Cyprus who erm, has tagged @NASA in her bio. I can only assume she works for NASA (hey guys can you confirm?) . When she's not also a stock photo model used by orthodontists, she's subtweeting the Muslim Brotherhood
4/ But Yael isn't the only Cypriot space scientist who also happens to have a mosque as a banner photo and tweets about the UAE, their green credentials, and occasionally the Muslim Broterhood. Meet Georgia Vasiliou. Oh yeah, and her account is verified....
5/ Ok one more Cypriot high-flyer living in Dubai with a verified account and a penchant for tweeting about the UAE and the Muslim Brotherhood. Maybe I am ignorant, but I also didn't realise how diverse Cyprus was. Kudos!
6/ We get it guys, you hate the Muslim brotherhood, but can you use a different stock photo?
7/ There are a few more verified accounts too (Good job Musk). This is Sara Mohammed, she's from Iraq, loves maximising returns (I mean who doesn't) and tweets a lot about the climate. She's also a stock photo model who likes foliage.
8/ But my personal favourite is Viyan Mahmud who I presume works for @amnesty. Her image is obviously AI generated. How do we know? Well the odd earrings and composition are a giveaway
9/ but the clincher is the fact who ever created it forgot to completely remove the 'this person does not exist' watermark from the top.
(for those who don't know, this person does not exist is a site that generates AI photoquality faces)
10/ The network has devoted a lot of time tweeting in support of Sultan Al Jaber. Sultan AL Jaber is the Cop28 President and is controversial because he is also CEO of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (adnoc)
11/ Yesterday the Guardian reported that Al Jaber's team had edited a Wikipedia entry to state he was '“precisely the kind of ally the climate movement needs". This quote was taken from a Bloomberg editorial theguardian.com/environment/20…
12/ Another terrifying development is the impossibly sultry, band of American environmental workers who are either AI-generated or from the same sci-fi novel. 2023: A Midjourney Odyssey?
13/ In addition to #COP28 many have been tweeting about Sudan recently. The general stance seems to be against Burhan, which puts them in line with UAE foreign policy. A lot of the content is just thanking UAE for aid to Sudan.
14/ The network is also tweeting in multiple languages, including Spanish, German and Arabic. There are also a lot of accounts that appear to be self-described as from Pakistan. The network has produced around 30000 tweets since its inception.
15/ Will add more later but I don't know who runs the network. It has a lot of overlaps with one promoting the expo a while back. Looks likes some marketing or PR firm tasked with strategic messaging for an entity in the UAE - but this is just a logical assumption based on… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
1/ 🧵This graph shows X posts by impressions in the first six hours after the Magdeburg attack. Specifically these are posts falsely attributing the attack to an Islamist terror attack or a Syrian, or using it as an opportunity to attack immigration or muslims #disinformation
2/ The usual suspects are there - that is, the anti-Islam disinfluencers (routine spreaders of disinformation). As you can see, one of the most widely viewed is @visegrad24 - who shared at least 6 posts falsely claiming the attacker was an Islamist
3/ The posts falsely claiming that the attacker was a Muslim or Islamist gained at least 38,000,000 views. False claims that he was Syrian resulted in around 8.4million views (remember this is just an approx 6 hour period).
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.