Read on Twitter
I’m a very proud #DGA member, but I wonder about #AI-related details of the new AMPTP deal.
I believe directors will be dealt with in the same way as @Teamsters drivers: AI won’t replace us; there just simply won’t be a use for us in AI films.
dga.org/News/PressRele…
I believe directors will be dealt with in the same way as @Teamsters drivers: AI won’t replace us; there just simply won’t be a use for us in AI films.
dga.org/News/PressRele…
And I would like to see language related to prohibiting directors’ past work being used to train LLMs and inform the style of #AI films. The current style-theft in user-gen AI trailers is creatively violating.
I’d also hope to see a director’s casting decisions locked and not changed after the fact, via #AI.
Additionally, actor scans can be used to completely change meaning and tone of a film or an earlier episode of a series, violating the director’s vision. This means NO PREVIOUS WORK IS LOCKED.
It crushes the core #DGA tenet of “one director’s vision.”
It crushes the core #DGA tenet of “one director’s vision.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
