Thread by @IWANTTOKNOWUK

'Explosive UAP Whistleblower Article' published by 'The Debrief' authored by Leslie Kean & Ralph Blumenthal

Here is what went on before and explains the back-channel efforts of what I'm told happened at the Washington Post and the New York Times

Pentagon Push-Back & The Media Cowards

NYT & WaPo
Senior Desk Editors

Julian Barnes of #NYT @julianbarnes
Shane Harris of #WAPO @shaneharris

Did these media outlets and the respective named journalists bottle one of the biggest stories in history, potentially one of the

biggest articles since #Watergate and #IranContra? they were both given the chance to run the #thehill UFO #whistleblower article and they both turned it down, if this is correct and this is what I have been told did happen, these guys and those media organisations need to be

torn a new arsehole, but should we even be surprised?

In the UFO community, Julian Barnes has a history of negative articles on the UAP topic I've previously theorised on Twitter that perhaps he was given the role of plicating the Pentagon for the earlier UAP NYT articles

Now ponder on this, I'm told Julian Barnes did not even give a reason for turning down the whistleblower article?

Shane Harris of WaPo was then offered the article, I'm told he seemed on board but then took days and days after saying he believed it, and wanted to run it,

before again bottling it, eventually claiming WaPo might potentially lose future Pentagon IC input for other stories - as we all know lots of leaks appeared on Twitter and Reddit - my feeling is that Pentagon Twitter sleepers were given the go-ahead to name the whistleblower and

damage or force the article to be dropped - I'll let history decide if that's a conspiracy theory.
We have all heard about the UAP pushback, & some claim even that is a conspiracy theory, but if these media outlets did bow to pressure, is this evidence of the pushback in action?

The Hill was also approached I'm not aware of why they did not publish it? @thehill