2/TLICS scores a fx on (1) morphology & (2) posterior ligamentous complex injury. Let's start w/morphology. TLICS scores severity like the steps to make & eat a pizza:
3/At the most mild, w/only mild axial loading, you get the simplest fx, a compression fx—like a simple long bone fx--worth 1 pt.
This is like when you just start to kneading the dough. There's pressure, but not as much as with a rolling pin!
4/As the axial force grows, this becomes a burst fx with retropulsion of the posterior vertebral body—just as greater force causes more comminution in long bone fxs.
This is like moving up from your hands to the rolling pin. A burst is worth 2 points.
5/If the force is shearing, you rip the connection between the vertebral bodies—it's is the equivalent of pulling on a long bone & causing its dislocation from its joint or connection with another bone
This is like when you throw the pizza up into the air. This is worth 3 points
6/Similar to shear forces, distracting forces rip the vertebral bodies apart. But rather than sliding forward or back, vertebral bodies are pulled up or down, resulting in a vertical gap between the vertebrae.
It is like tearing the pizza apart to eat it. It is worth 4 points
7/This summarizes the TLICS scoring for fracture morphology. The higher the number, the greater the force and injury to the spine—ranging from simple compression fxs worth only 1 point to where the spine is literally ripped apart—a distraction injury, worth 4 points.
8/The next TLICS imaging finding is the integrity of the PLC. If it is intact, you get 0 pts. If you needed a tweetorial for that, well…I can’t help you much. If there is edema, but no true rupture on MRI, that is worth 2 pts. True disruption on MRI is worth 3 pts.
9/The difference between suspected injury & injured is like the difference of seeing smoke & suspecting fire (you see edema on MR & suspect injury) and actually seeing the fire (seeing the ligamentous tear as disruption of the T2 dark line of the ligament on MR).
10/ Here is an example of suspected injury—edema is seen in the posterior ligamentous complex, but the T2 dark lines that are the ligaments themselves appear intact. This is worth 2 pts.
11/If you can find a true disruption or gap in the T2 dark line of the ligament, that is considered truly disrupted and worth 3 points.
12/Here is the summary of the scoring for PLC injury in TLICS. Edema is suspicious, but only a true gap is considered injured.
13/So now you know how to score imaging findings in thoracolumbar fxs--I hope that takes a load off your back!
Remember, it's as easy as pizza pie!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@TheAJNR 2/In the lumbar spine, it is all about the degree of canal narrowing & room for nerve roots.
In the cervical spine, we have another factor to think about—the cord.
Cord integrity is key. No matter the degree of stenosis, if the cord isn’t happy, the patient won’t be either
@TheAJNR 3/Cord flattening, even w/o canal stenosis, can cause myelopathy.
No one is quite sure why.
Some say it’s b/c mass effect on static imaging may be much worse dynamically, some say repetitive microtrauma, & some say micro-ischemia from compression of perforators
1/Do radiologists sound like they are speaking a different language when they talk about MRI?
T1 shortening what? T2 prolongation who?
Here’s a translation w/an introductory thread to MRI.
2/Let’s start w/T1—it is #1 after all! T1 is for anatomy
Since it’s anatomic, brain structures will reflect the same color as real life
So gray matter is gray on T1 & white matter is white on T1
So if you see an image where gray is gray & white is white—you know it’s a T1
3/T1 is also for contrast
Contrast material helps us to see masses
Contrast can’t get into normal brain & spine bc of the blood brain barrier—but masses don’t have a blood brain barrier, so when you give contrast, masses will take it up & light up, making them easier to see.
1/Asking “How old are you?” can be dicey—both in real life & on MRI! Do you know how to tell the age of blood on MRI?
Here’s a thread on how to date blood on MRI so that the next time you see a hemorrhage, your guess on when it happened will always be in the right vein!
2/If you ask someone how to date blood on MRI, they’ll spit out a crazy mnemonic about babies that tells you what signal blood should be on T1 & T2 imaging by age.
But mnemonics are crutch—they help you memorize, but not understand. If you understand, you don’t need to memorize
3/If you look at the mnemonic, you will notice one thing—the T1 signal is all you need to tell if blood is acute, subacute or chronic.
T2 signal will tell if it is early or late in each of those time periods—but that type of detail isn’t needed in real life
Here's a little help on how to do it yourself w/a thread on how to read a head CT!
2/In bread & butter neuroimaging—CT is the bread—maybe a little bland, not super exciting—but necessary & you can get a lot of nutrition out of it
MRI is like the butter—everyone loves it, it makes everything better, & it packs a lot of calories. Today, we start w/the bread!
3/The most important thing to look for on a head CT is blood.
Blood is Bright on a head CT—both start w/B.
Blood is bright bc for all it’s Nobel prizes, all CT is is a density measurement—and blood is denser (thicker) than water & denser things are brighter on CT
MMA fights get a lot of attention, but MMA (middle meningeal art) & dural blood supply doesn’t get the attention it deserves.
A thread on dural vascular anatomy!
2/Everyone knows about the blood supply to the brain.
Circle of Willis anatomy is king and loved by everyone, while the vascular anatomy of the blood supply to the dura is the poor, wicked step child of vascular anatomy that is often forgotten
3/But dural vascular anatomy & supply are important, especially now that MMA embolizations are commonly for chronic recurrent subdurals.
It also important for understanding dural arteriovenous fistulas as well.