And here is Shibo Jiang developing peptide inhibitors for Gp-120.... one of the homologous regions of the COVID spike protein that was inserted by "unknown" entities...
Oh look who he pops up with. His buddy Zengli Shi, the "Batwoman" whose lab were the source of the Wuhan COVID outbreak.
"Development of Viral Fusion inhibitors" you say?
Well Zengli Shi had already developed those fusion inhibitors years before. So why weren't they available to the public, if this coronavirus was so deadly?
So now we have a NIH grant awarded to Hotez (who was supposedly working on Coronavirus vaccines for years) and at the same time to the people intimately involved in making a "pandemic" coronavirus for which they had an inhibitor.
And this "dream team" was supposed to be "curing forgotten tropical diseases".
Including ones that coincidentally caused cardiomyopathy (sequelae of myocarditis), for which they were trying to patent a new treatment.
How coincidental.
Here's the full list of papers between Bottazzi and Hotez - 176 in total and 100 in the last 5 years.
It's amazing how they could write all those in the time, without help from #BigPharma ghost writers - given how busy they were trying to save the world
So in summary here we have the smoking gun evidence that the NIH were funding the very people who were not only responsible for developing new pandemic coronaviruses that would shut down the world....
But despite years of funding never released a single beneficial product.
And stand to make millions by channelling more government money to their coffers, and millions more from their patents for the very cardiomyopathies their products have caused.
Let's play jeopardy.
The answer is "money laundering".
What's the question?
Remember that this is just the tip of the iceberg of the links between people who have vested interests in controlling the population with pandemic fear and at the same time creating and enforcing vaccines (however bad they are) on us.
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.
There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.
It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.
It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.
If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.
But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.
She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.
None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.
But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...