A research paper is the ultimate capture & deliver tool for knowledge.
In a scientific paper, the research contribution is the star of the show.
In the interdisciplinary young field of HCI, these 7 patterns emerged.
Similar ones will exist in your field.
1. Empirical Contributions
These reveal how people use systems or are themselves.
They provide critical raw data & observations.
We ask to judge:
• How solid is the methodology?
• What do they reveal?
• Data validity?
Write up your methodology, data, & insights clearly.
2. Artifact Contributions
Include systems, tools, architectures, & techniques.
• Reveal new possibilities
• Enable new explorations
• Facilitate new research insights
Evaluated based on impact & approach.
Highlight novelty, functionality, & potential impact of artifacts.
3. Methodological Contributions
Improve existing methods or develop new tools & techniques.
Evaluated based on
• Novelty
• Effectiveness
• Potential to improve research outcomes
Focus writing on the novelty & effectiveness of your method & how it can improve HCI research.
4. Theoretical Contributions
Explain phenomena with new or improved theories.
Identify the causes of certain phenomena.
We judge them by
• Novelty
• Soundness
• Explanatory power.
Concentrate on your theory's newness, reliability, and capacity for phenomena explanation.
Hey, while you're reading this:
Don't miss out on free tips in my writing newsletter & take my online course about academic writing, where you learn everything you must know to write an academic paper.
Summarize & paraphrase like a pro with these target phrases:
• X observes that
• X argues that
• X believes that
• X questions whether
• X claims that
• X concedes that
• X demonstrates that
• X emphasizes that
2. Quotations
Alert your readers.
These target phrases signal a direct quote is coming up.
• X asserts
• X stated that
• X argues in her book that
• In the journal ABC, X expresses dissatisfaction with
• X's disagreement is evident in her writing, where she states that
How to write your paper's research methods section
(without your choices seeming arbitrary to reviewers)
↓
Writing Methods is where most people start their paper.
The goal:
Provide sufficient information for reviewers to assess the study's validity.
The explanation should be crystal clear, precise, and leave no room for confusion about how and why the experiment was conducted.
For example, a method section includes:
• Research design (in empirical research)
• Sample size and population
• The experimental protocol
• Data collection methods
• Data analysis methods
• Ethical considerations
I started by struggling with how to narrow down a research problem
(without any guidance from my PhD supervisor).
Here's how you frame a research problem statement
(in 5 super simple steps + examples) ↓
1. Highlight the gap in existing research on your topic
• Focus your audience on unexplored research
• This shows readers why your research question needs exploration
✅ Ask yourself what areas of your topic existing research hasn't addressed yet.
❗️State that clearly.
Example:
"Despite the growing interest in and the critical role of inclusive design in human-computer interaction, there is a lack of studies on the user experience of people with colour blindness. This often overlooked area in the field provides the impetus for our research."