Daniel Batten Profile picture
Jun 21 9 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/9

Incredibly, in 2032 Landfills are projected to become the biggest source of our strongest lever to reduce climate change

Here's why that's true, and more importantly how we can pull that lever Image
2/9

Until 2022, we thought our methane emission sources looked like this

source: worldbank.org/en/news/factsh… Image
3/9

But then NASA revealed the results of 6 years satellite monitoring of landfills Image
4/9

Our methane emissions actually look like this Image
5/9

However, landfills emissions are growing at 1.4% p.a.

This is double the compound annual growth of agriculture at 0.7%

Based on this, landfills will become our major source of our strongest lever to reduce climate change (methane) by mid-2032

That's just 9 years away Image
6/9

The best way to reduce that methane is to turn it into electricity. Here's a landfill I visited earlier this week that's been doing this for 20 years.

This is their carpark. You can plug in your eV to recharge off electricity produced by landfill gas ! Image
7/9

They create that electricity by purifying the landfill gas then piping into these things: generators.

This is generator 13 and 14. Yes they have 14

They generate 14 MW of electricity, which not only slashes carbon emissions, it earns the landfill ~USD6Million per yr. Image
8/9

So if its so good for the environment and lucrative, why isn't every landfill doing it?

Simple: only 30% of landfills can sell power back to the grid

For the other 70%, the grid is not equipped to take extra power without major upgrade

source: EPA/Vespene
9/9

So sadly, these 70% of landfills continue to emit huge volumes of methane

If only there were a user of that power that could locate at the landfill, without even needing the grid

Then we'd have a solution for our soon-to-be #1 source of methane worldwide

If only🤔

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Batten

Daniel Batten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DSBatten

Jun 21
Bitcoin mining is essential for the renewable transition

Here's why in one less-than-10-tweet thread

To achieve net zero, IEA report we will need 10x more demand response

That's grid jargon for "really really flexible consumers who can shut off and power on any time"

🧵 Image
IEA say we need 10x more demand response (DR) to achieve net-zero because solar/wind are unpredictable and intermittent in their supply

To counterbalance that, they need a lot of really flexible customers

Otherwise grids can have too much or too little power (blackout risk) Image
The Perfect Demand Response customer has 3 features

Immediacy: you can immediately ramp up or down consumption

Longevity: you can shed or consume more for as long as, say, an extreme weather event occurs

Precision: you can reduce or increase consumption to an exact level
Read 9 tweets
Mar 7
1/4

@woonomic was in the country, so we teamed up to create something we've planned for a bit:

4 Dynamic Bitcoin ESG Charts

Whatever your view of ESG, Govt & Institutional Investors need this data. Now we have it

1. shows Bitcoin's progress to 52.6% sustainable energy
👇 Bitcoin mining now uses more than 0.5 (50%) sustainable ener
2/4 Total Emissions

This shows that since the China-ban the previous rising emissions trend has reversed.

Network emissions are trending downwards, even as hashrate and electricity consumption increase

Miners switching to sustainable energy is a big driver for this Green line shows negative emissions (flared/vented methane).
3/4 Emissions per dollar of market cap are decreasing.

This chart shows that unlike the current global financial system where GDP-growth is tethered to rising emissions, Bitcoin's market cap can grow while emissions do not.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 20
1/4

Having a model means we can start building charts

Here's 4 new charts for Bitcoin & Energy

#Bitcoin has grown its sustainable energy mix @ 6.2% p.a from Jan 2020

* 6.2% growth rate is faster than any major industry
* 52.6% Sustainable mix is ⬆️ any major industry

🧵
2/4

Bitcoin Emissions have trended down since the China ban

Due to known model omissions, CCAF (over)estimates emissions at 58.58 MTCO2e (ccaf.io/cbeci/ghg/index)

With off-grid mining factored in, the figure is 33% lower at 39.33 Mt CO2e

(0.079% of global CO2e emissions)
3/4

Bitcoin emission intensity is decreasing

This measures emissions per KWh. A Coindesk article picked up Cambridge data to suggest that emissions intensity "may be increasing" coindesk.com/business/2022/…

This is again incorrect. It has been trending down for at least 3.5 yrs
Read 6 tweets
Feb 2
1/24
On Jan 31 @greenpeaceusa continued it's paid campaign against a technology that the research consistently says is net environment positive with its most sensationalist and ludicrous heading yet

greenpeace.org/usa/american-f…

Here's my response @AnnieMLeonard @ebony_4_justice
2/24

Rather than research you've actually doubled down on more paid (& failed) misinformation, courtesy of $5+1 Million from billionaire altcoiner Chris Larsen who has a vested interest attacking Bitcoin

Faux environmental concern: his pretext
You've become his paid attack dog
3/24

But I go further, clear one or two things up.

In my three decades as a climate activist and environmental campaigner I’ve never seen such a large volume of misinformation has has been launched against Bitcoin
Read 24 tweets
Jan 27
1/13

By using Proof of Work, Bitcoin has
*12 humanitarian benefits
*21 environmental benefits
*5 env'l drawbacks
*weighted env'l benefit:cost ratio = 31:1

On Proof of Stake it would've had
*0 humanitarian benefits
*0 env'l benefits
*0 env'l drawbacks
👇
2/13

IOW, Proof of work is far more ESG than Proof of Stake (which'd be a digital lobotomy for BTC)

The 12 humanitarian benefits already benefitting >1 million people are

1. Providing a path for 14 African nations beyond financial colonisation (the Central African Franc)
2. African cross-border payments without a EU or US-based middleman (stops one source of wealth-bleed from Africa)

3. Remittance payments to working class families throughout developing world without large cut to Western Union
Read 13 tweets
Jan 27
1/3

By using Proof of Work, Bitcoin has
*12 humanitarian benefits
*21 environmental benefits
*5 env'l drawbacks
*weighted env'l benefit:cost ratio = 31:1

On Proof of Stake it would've had
*0 humanitarian benefits
*0 env'l benefits
*0 env'l drawbacks
👇
2/13

IOW, Proof of work is far more ESG than Proof of Stake (which'd be a digital lobotomy for BTC)

The 12 humanitarian benefits already benefitting >1 million people are

1. Providing a path for 14 African nations beyond financial colonisation (the Central African Franc)
2. African cross-border payments without a EU or US-based middleman (stops one source of wealth-bleed from Africa)

3. Remittance payments to working class families throughout developing world without large cut to Western Union
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(