Tactical Dynamo: How Amrabat would redefine Manchester United’s playbook
➡️ Unraveling the veracity of long pass
➡️ Licha, Onana & Amrabat, build-up ensemble
➡️ Not as aerially dominant as Casemiro
➡️ Rice-esque dribbler
➡️ Ball-DAWG terrier in defence
#MUFC
[Tactical Thread]
Long passing forms an important part of his game, and the stats suggest he's a world leader in this aspect. However, upon closer inspection, the eye test reveals that he's good but not great.
One of the issues lies in his biomechanics - he tends to lean back too much, resulting in off-balance passes that hit underneath the ball, making some of them loopy. On the bright side, his curved passing is much better, showcasing a very nice club in his locker.
Nevertheless, his long passing can be hit and miss, oscillating between an absolute scorcher and an aimless long ball.
His attitude is commendable, as he likes to get the play moving as soon as possible, which is something to appreciate.
However, it's worth noting that his passing doesn't always give the receiver the easiest time. Often, they have to work hard to trap the ball due to his lack of desire to hit an easy pass.
When it comes to possession play, he’ll prove to be an asset for the team. He's the kind of player who'll keep it nice and tidy in the midfield, handling the ball with finesse.
Under pressure, he remains incredibly calm, showing comfort in receiving from the defence or goalkeeper during build-up plays, a skill that even surpasses Casemiro.
Another feature is his ability to drop between the centre-backs to aid in build-up when needed. Considering these attributes, he could become a tactically important weapon for Manchester United.
Defensively, he appears to shine the most. Though his defensive volume might not be high, he rarely gets it wrong when he decides to get stuck in. His ball-winning skills are elite, making him a solid addition to Manchester United's midfield.
A bit of a terrier, he's not afraid to go in for tackles and challenges. However, his aggressiveness can sometimes be a double-edged sword, as he can be susceptible to fouls, leading to penalties or rash attempts to win the ball.
The potential downside of this aggressive playstyle is that he may get caught out of position at times.
His preference for slide tackling further illustrates his approach to defending, and his ability to read the game and intercept passes quickly is impressive.
United's pressing game would notably improved with him on the pitch. However, it's crucial to be aware of the downsides, such as the fouling issue and the risk of being caught on the wrong side of the attacker.
Aerially, Amrabat might be considered a downgrade from Casemiro. He tends to get beaten far too easily in the air, which could be a concern for Manchester United's pressing structure. Teams facing them may exploit this weakness by opting for long passes to relieve pressure.
His dribbling is reminiscent of Rice - a powerful runner, capable of driving through enemy lines with the ball. In tight spaces, his dribbling diminishes and he can be caught overplaying. Otherwise, this is a unique attribute that the United midfield currently doesn’t have.
Amrabat’s presence at United brings strengths and areas of growth. Impressive passing and tactical impact outweigh the potential drawbacks in his heading and defensive positioning. His unique dribbling adds value.
Overall, an exciting signing for United’s summer of revolution.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is Sandro Tonali A Good Tactical Fit For Newcastle? [Thread]
➡️Brings midfield support to Bruno G
➡️Trippier unleashed
➡️Tactical evolution in the long run
➡️However, Tonali’s presence doesn’t resolve the question of whether Bruno is still the ideal choice as the 6
#NUFC
Tonali brings much needed support to Bruno G in midfield. Despite having success playing in a swashbuckling style, Eddie Howe knows against Europe’s elite, his side needs more balance in midfield.
Tonali from a young age was mis-profiled as a deep playmaker but’s he’s much more of a B2B midfielder who gets around the pitch, influencing play in multiple areas of the pitch. A Gattuso-lite, albeit being more astute in possession.
Rice and Lavia is a potentially gorgeous combination. Wet behind the ears at UCL level? yes but complementary. Rice weakness in build up is cancelled by Lavia's comfort in pivot and Rice can protect him defensively.
We covered a lot of this in our Havertz tactical thread but Lavia would still enable the 3-2-2-3 formation as he can take over from Zinny/Partey as a conduit in the build up phase. His favourite thing to do is collect it off CB's and remain deep, controlling from the back.
Rice is then free to dabble in the build up, take minimal touches if need be and then focus on joining in once the ball is closer to the centre circle and entering into opponents half. He is much better when facing the goal and being direct and aggressive in possession.
➡️ May enable use of a box midfield alongside Ricedo
➡️ Can rotate with Jesus ingame, or fill in when absent
➡️ Needs runners to side & ahead, similar to Firmino
➡️ Tuchel enabled initial flourish but ends up killing him
[THREAD]
The only way Havertz and Jesus can co-exist in the same side barring Jesus playing on the wing, is in a 3-2-2-3 and with Kai playing a more aggressive Xhaka role whereby he can play LCAM and interchange with Jesus up front.
If Caicedo does not come, the same shape can be replicated with Zinny next to Rice. Benefits are the creative burden is lifted off Odegaard on to another attacking midfielder and it gives Jesus freedom to drop, knowing someone else can fill in up top and arriving aerial presence.
➡️ Do not Cuc-kold Mudryk, get Chilly in.
➡️ Moukoko loss is a huge blow as with no Badiashile, Silva could have been vulnerable
➡️ Does Potter go with a back 5?
➡️ Who should partner Enzo?
Not a huge fan of Cucurella... he looks pretty in the left midfield section but fails to make an impact in two key areas, zone 3 and 11... can't defend and lacks end product (for now).
Chilwell is sorely missed and as this is Chelsea's only shot of silverware, he has to start.
This takes pressure off Mudryk to run that flank - still looks like he needs some gym work to unlock the explosiveness he seems to have in his locker and also helps James from being the team's only natural width threat.
➡️ No Mbappe robs PSG of 'vertical' penetration
➡️ Full Back Battle - Stalemate?🤤
➡️ Bayern lack CF to trouble Ramos/Marquinhos?
➡️ Can Kimi/Goretzka protect half spaces where Messi and Neymar operate?
It is tough to call the lineups in this first leg, with both managers renowned for their constant tinkering in shape and selection... not to mention injuries to players like Mbappe and Muller, both of whom may or may not start on Tuesday.
Without Mbappe, PSG have a penetration issue. Whilst Bayern's backline is pretty quick and physically powerful, it isn't blessed with high tier defensive IQ and the MNM trio as a collective looked well set to give this Bayern defensive unit issue especially on the counter...
➡️ Arteta-Ball dominates
➡️ Do Arsenal's right backs have a purpose?
➡️ Bobby Nketiah
➡️ Rashford aside - Where is the penetration?
➡️ Saka is Arsenal's John Barnes - Shaw abandoned him
This is not a ETH side... sitting back and hoping for moments of quality, but he is making do with what strengths the squad currently has which at the moment is relying on Rashford to conjure moments of magic as soon as United win the ball back and opponents are in disarray..
As for Arteta, this side looks like it can dominant any fixture it goes into but the litmus test will be facing Man City. If Arteta can dominate proceedings against a Pep side, then you will know just how 'dominant' this style of play truly is. I think they can outrun City...