I have become fascinated with one of the more obscure defendants that was named in the @faniforDA indictment that most prominently included Donald Trump and his efforts to reverse the Presidential outcome (his loss) in Georgia. The name is Rev. Stephen Lee and he is an ordained Missouri Synod Lutheran minister & a connection to NAR (New Apostolic Reformation). 1/9
Here is the relevant section of the @faniforDA indictmetn that discusses Rev. Stephen Lee's invovlement and the relevant charges. Basically he traveled to Georgia to help with the efforts of overturning Trump's loss there after the 2020 election. Lee was indicted for attempting to coerce election worker Ruby Freeman into falsely admitting election fraud. 2/9
First it should be noted that the doctrine of the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church (LCMS) is very very different from that of the ELCA Lutheran church with LCMS being much more conservative and rigid. Anti-LGBTQ, anti-reproductive rights, forbids women being ministers and oddly states a position against Freemasonry ect... 3/9
The most interesting aspects of Rev. Stephen Lee is both his path of radicalization that would lead him to breaking the law in furtherance of Donald Trump attempt to reverse the Georgia results in the 2020 election and his connection to the NAR (New Apostolic Reformation) movement. Its hard to conceptualize a path of Christian radicalization, given he first started a career in law enforcement. 4/9
However, looking at a reference to his most recent church, a portion of his bio on the About page jumped out at us, and indicates a rather interesting connection to NAR (New Apostolic Reformation) through his wife Elaine. She stated that she had worked both for Dr. James Dobson's ultra-conservative Focus on the Family in Colorado Springs and done work for Dr. Winfield Arn's Institute for American Church Growth 5/9
Who is Dr. Winfield Arn you ask? Dr. Winfield Arn started an Evangelical institute in 1973 called the Institute for American Church Growth. Notably this institute had C. Peter Wagner as one of its original board members and colleagues. For those of you already familiar with C. Peter Wagner he is most recently noted as the founder of the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) movement, known as a key leader of the Church Growth Movement and known for his writings on spiritual warfare. 6/9
In 1998 C. Peter Wagner published the book "Churchquake" and denied that NAR had any political orientation. However, 10 years later he published "Dominion", an endorsement of Seven Mountains Dominionism and Dominion Theology. 7/9 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Peter_…
An excellent article by @jennycohn1 in the Bucks County Beacon that delves into the January 6th insurrection, C. Peter Wagner and his New Apostolic Reformation movement. Read the whole thread by Jenny 8/9
There is alot of talk that the new Qanon movie "Sound of Freedom" is being heavily astroturfed and this thread by @CyKoore sure seems to support that idea. Lots of talk that big blocks of tickets are being bought up by unknown dark money sources and lots of videos of empty… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
In fact Angel Studios themselves crowd-sourced the purchase of tickets to the #SoundOfFeeedom movie that supposedly were then provided free of charge to patrons wanting to watch the movie. It would appear millions of tickets were procured in this manner both by Angel Studios and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
So is the supposed talk of box office success of #SoundOfFeeedom actually being astroturfed? Its difficult to empirically assess something like this but one way is to look at Google trends data and compare it to other movie openings. We found a few things of interest. One thing… https://t.co/KS6fPXmayktwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This is looking more and more like a classic Kremlin hack and leak disinfo Op. Pretty clear with the fabricated Russian vs Ukrainian troop losses. We have found a couple pro-Kremlin accounts dispersing the documents on Twitter well before the NYTimes. Accounts involved in prior Kremlin #disinfo
Here is one pro-Kremlin troll account that has a clear past history of pushing out / boosting prior Kremlin disinformation operations. This account pushed out a portion of the leaked document hours before the New York Times article and promoted the part that was fabricated showing a significantly lower level of Russian troop losses than that of Ukrainian troop losses. Oddly levels lower than what even the Russian MoD has admitted to in the past. We redacted the sensitive parts of the screenshot of the original tweet.
Without having the original un-rendered image its difficult to assess how it might have been photoshopped / manipulated but it does appear text insertions were made in the "Total Assessed Losses" section. See image 2. Because the documents appear to have been leaked as photos of the physical copies there are bends and warpage in the final image. This was not fully taken into account in the manipulated / fabricated image.
And here is possible confirmation. Before and after ... insertions and deletions in the numbers of troop losses and equipment losses. Since this was also posted by someone else anonymously still no way to vouch for authenticity but seems to align with what others are saying in private. Still not clear how these classified documents detailing secret U.S. and NATO plans for aiding Ukraine were leaked and how much of them are even real. #NATO leaks #activemeasures #InfoOp cc @Dragnet_News
So remember a few months back when @NickKnudsenUS and I believe @visionsurreal also before that brought this to our attention .... this crazy Watchman Decree pledge / NAR adjacent video? One part of it seemed especially odd? The part that pledged "we declare we will be energy… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This section in particular in Emma Brown's new @washingtonpost article talking about how Ginni Brown's CRC group was only ever on one amicus brief and it was with the "American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers" group. Who here would be shocked to learn that we may soon find… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Here is the tweet from @NickKnudsenUS again that shows the full video. Please watch it. Note the part about the "seven mountains" ... something very integral to NAR ideology. And the reference to "wokeness" is no mistake. This is "Christofascism"
Well this was a rather STUNNING relevation by Lev Parnas tonight ... that Hunter Biden was drugged in kazakhstan in 2019 by the Russian FSB with the cooperation of the CEO of Burisma and his harddrive was copied and possibly manipulated by Russian Intel to be used later as… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Lev Parnas goes on to implicate Rudy Giuliani in a rather eye popping way ... including prior in the Twitter space the allegation that Giuliani had access to and used a Russian asset for the past 15 yrs.
Lev Parnas earlier in the Twitter space discussed why he was prosecuted & said he funneled about $500,000 Russian money to campaigns of
Donald Trump
Kevin McCarthy
Ron DeSantis
Pete Sessions
While in jail he came to the realization that he was a pawn used by Giuliani and that… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
A Kremlin #disinfo Op is ongoing. Videos & likely fake interviews portray a fake narrative of "Zelensky forced conscription / mobilization in Odessa & elsewhere". Problem is many if not all these videos are not conscription but rather arrests or other easily explained events
Its about 4 or 5 videos very heavily recycled by clear troll accounts and I am willing to bet most are standard arrests of either Russian collaborators or any other type of standard detainment during war time.
The Kremlin really really wants you to believe that #Ukraine is only fighting back against the Russian invasion of Ukraine’s sovereign territory because the … 1/2
Besides the acknowledged narrow scope of the new NYU #disinfo study one of the biggest issues IMHO with the study was the utilization of voter survey data. The issues targeted by the Kremlin was much more nuanced than voter survey data available 2 the authors.. AFTER THE FACT 1/4
This was no fault of the authors given they had to do a retrospective study. The authors did find subtle shifts (but not statistically significant) and if you looked at the questions that would have been most relevant to the Kremlin ... these pro-Kremlin shifts were largest. 2/4
Important nuanced questions that would not likely have been in most voter survey data collected prior to the 2016 election & appeared to be important in the targeting by the Kremlin would have been below (I'm sure there are others). Chinese tariffs & Obamacare... not so much 3/4