Garrett Johnson Profile picture
Dec 21 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🚨Working paper update!🚨

What is the impact of strict #privacy regulation on content supply and demand?

In Sept 2019, YouTube paid a record $170M to settle charges it violated children’s privacy law (#COPPA). We use this to study the "privacy-for-content" tradeoff. 1/11 Image
Beginning Jan 2020, YouTube identified kids content and eliminated all related personalization including: personalized ads, search, content recommendations, & commenting.
This matches FTC's proposed rules to strengthen COPPA announced yesterday: 2/ bit.ly/3RMARdf
Image
YouTube creators worried these changes amounted to the "COPPAcalypse."
We study 5,066 top U.S. YouTube channels by comparing child-directed content creators to their non-child-directed counterparts using a difference-in-differences design. 3/ Image
We show child-directed content creators produce 18% less content and pivot towards producing non-child-directed content.
Ad price data is not public, but one creator shared with us that ad prices fell 73% without personalized ads. 4/ Image
🚨New result #1🚨 Child-directed channels also reduced their share of original content by 11% (7.7 p.p.): e.g., by creating compilations of old content.
We quantify duplicate content using video transcripts to identify chunks of text that appear in a channel's prior releases. 5/
Image
Image
🚨New result #2🚨 Child-directed channels reduce their share of manual captioning by 26% (3.8 p.p.). Manual captions reduce errors in automated captions. Captioning helps viewers who are hard of hearing & helps children learn vocabulary & reading. 6/
The original content & manual captioning results suggest that child-directed channels invest less in quality. We also find user ratings (like/view ratio) falls 10% reflecting this & YouTube's degraded capacity to match viewers to content. 7/ Image
On the demand side, views of child-directed channels fell by 20% & channel subscriptions fall 25%.
We emphasize that our data consists of channels in the education, entertainment, & film + animation verticals. Impact on educational channels is similar. 8/ Image
Consistent with the YouTube's degraded capacity to match viewers to content, we find that content creation (L) and especially content views (R) become more concentrated among large child-directed YouTube channels. 9/
Image
Image
FTC wants stronger #COPPA, EU’s #DSA bans personalized ads for kids <18 & proposed COPPA 2.0 raises age from 13 to 16.
The social benefit of kids’ privacy may exceed the cost to content supply & demand, but regulators should keep this in mind. 10/
Read the paper here: "COPPAcalypse? The YouTube settlement’s impact on kids content” w/ @TesaryLin, James Cooper, & Liang Zhong
➡️ END ssrn.com/abstract=44303…
Image
@TesaryLin @threadreaderapp please unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garrett Johnson

Garrett Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garjoh_canuck

Apr 27
🚨New working paper!🚨

We study the "privacy-for-content" tradeoff using the 2019 YouTube COPPA settlement.

"COPPAcalypse? The YouTube settlement’s impact on kids content” w/ @TesaryLin, James Cooper, & Liang Zhong
➡️ ssrn.com/abstract=44303… 1/9 Image
Data sharing increases ad revenue, which pays for free content, & helps personalize websites to better find the content we want. On the other hand, people want more privacy online: especially for kids.
The YouTube settlement shows the consequences of strict privacy regulation. 2/ Image
In Sept. 2019, YouTube paid a record $170M to settle charges it violated children’s privacy law (COPPA). Beginning Jan. 2020, YouTube identified kids content and eliminated all related personalization including: personalized ads, search, content recommendations, & commenting. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 9
🧵What have economists learned from the #GDPR?
I review the literature for a future NBER book on the "Economics of #Privacy" edited by @ce_tucker & @avicgoldfarb. 1/7
nber.org/books-and-chap…
Regulators & researchers seek to balance privacy & the data economy. The EU’s #GDPR is a landmark & influential regulation that defines personal data expansively. GDPR establishes:
-rules for data processing,
-rights for EU residents,
-responsibilities for firms, &
-BIG fines. 2/
#GDPR is hard to study:
A) Finding a suitable control group is hard because the GDPR had global spillovers. E.g., it affects EU firms & non-EU firms serving EU residents.
B) GDPR can screw with personal data: e.g., you may only see data from consenting users. 3/
Read 9 tweets
Jan 26, 2022
🧵Explainer for the Topics API 🧵
Google announced the Topics API for Privacy Sandbox🏖️. Topics is basically FLoC v2.0. Google is deftly replacing FLoC v1 with a more anodyne technology and name...
Details: developer.chrome.com/docs/privacy-s…
1/8
Topics allows for interest-based ads without 3rd party cookies. Most research, including our own, shows ad prices are 2-3X higher with cookies.
Put concretely: Interest-based ads help fund content that is socially valuable, but uninteresting to advertisers. 2/ Image
In Topics, the browser classifies begins by classifying the sites that users visit into topics from a list of ~350 readable & benign topics like cats🐈 or hockey🏒.
To do so, sites must opt in and users can opt out. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Jul 13, 2021
Thread explaining FLEDGE (formerly TURTLEDOVE).
Online advertising generates value for publishers, advertisers, & users. Now, Google & others are proposing alternatives that preserve this value while better protecting user privacy under the "Privacy Sandbox" proposals. 1/12
The public discussion of #PrivacySandbox is dominated by #FLoC, but many tech solutions are required to satisfy advertising use cases while protecting privacy. In particular, #FLEDGE propose more fundamental & interesting changes to the status quo. 2/
The key to FLEDGE is to move user targeting information onto the *browser*, rather than broadcasting a cookie ID to the adtech ecosystem so advertisers can bid on ad opportunities based on what they know about that cookie ID. The prototypical FLEDGE use-case is retargeting. 3/
Read 12 tweets
May 26, 2021
Happy 3rd birthday🎂 of the #GDPR🇪🇺!

🧵We recently released a big update to our working paper examining how the #GDPR affected the site traffic💻 & ecommerce revenue💶 of EU users. (w/ @samgarvingold & Scott Shriver) 1/11 ssrn.com/abstract=34217… (image: Digiday) Image
We partnered with @Adobe to study the GDPR’s impact on EU users across 1,084 firm site analytics dashboards. Our data contain 77 of the top 1K sites & >700 long tail sites below the top 100K. We see >$0.75 billion in EU spending and 4.4 billion EU pageviews in total per week. 2/ Image
We observe rich site outcomes in Adobe data. But, after the GDPR, we stop observing data from non-consenting users. If recorded site traffic falls post-GDPR, we want to know:
A) how much did GDPR hurt real outcomes of websites?
B) how much did consent limit data recording? 3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
May 3, 2021
In 2020, the Dutch public broadcaster NPO got rid of cookies and saw its revenues improve. This is held up as a hopeful example that privacy and publisher monetization can coexist. I want to share three comments. 🧵 1/8
wired.com/story/can-kill…
NPO claims that revenue rose 70% year-over-year in the first 2 months without cookies. This is an impressive achievement unlocked by building their own ad server, next generating contextual targeting, marketing to advertisers, etc. 2/
brave.com/publisher-3rd-…
Comment #1: This case study is hard to assess because year-over-year changes are far from apples-to-apples comparisons. Much can change between years that would confound our interpretation--beyond the many changes NPO implemented. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(