I have been repeatedly warning for decades that the climate and ecological crisis, could create major food shortages and threaten our civilization far earlier than predictions imply.
As I spelled out in this thread only 2 days ago, if extreme weather events line up around the world in any given year. Extreme rainfall in some areas, lack of rainfall in others, extreme heat in others, hurricanes, - it'd cause global food shortages.
We have already seen many regional agricultural impacts, which can be compensated, by surpluses elsewhere. But what happens, if there's a perfect storm and various impacts, cause shortages across the globe?
3/
As climate change progresses, this is made more and more likely. We are already seeing a huge variety of climate impacts around the globe, from wildfires, flooding, drought, intensified tropical storms, etc. What I say, is not hypothetical, it's happening now.
4/
There is the very real possibility, that if this extreme weather lined up in a certain way, it could massively impact global food production in a given year. Before accusing me of raising hypotheticals, let me point to what is already happening.
5/
As I make clear in my thread 2 days ago, this risk starts this year, with the El Nino effects, causing warming in excess of 1.5C. I am not saying it is going to happen this year, simply that there is a quantifiable risk of it occurring.
6/
That we have sleep walked into a potential avoidable catastrophe, by taking no meaningful action in the last 30 years, and making no proper preparations for this eventuality.
As I make clear, food shortages don't have to be absolute to have major societal impacts.
7/
In a free market economy, restricted supplies of food commodities, will cause hyperinflation, making food unaffordable to many, with massive potential societal political, and geo-political implications. The free market system, itself is a major liability.
8/
The free market system, may drive prices down in times of surplus, but conversely, it also drives up prices in times of restricted supply. We are now facing the realistic prospects of restricted food supplies, due to climate change. It is a dangerous combination.
9/
I agree with the wonderful @vanessa_vash's wisdom here. Potential climate related food shortages, are no longer just an African problem, and the world should never have seen it like this. Climate Justice and equity, are important dynamics.
Once again, I am not trying to spread alarm. I am just pleading for realistic thinking and analysis.
That we are now planning to survive on luck, just hoping that extreme, climate change driven weather, doesn't combine in an unfortunate way, is dangerous and reckless.
11/
None of this danger is inevitable, and it is avoidable, if we come together, to solve this crisis cooperatively. This is the danger of the artificial competition, in the current neoliberal system, in that it inhibits cooperation, by design. We need joined up thinking.
12/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The climate crisis situation, has changed dramatically in the last few years. It is now very clear, that all major governments, will seriously resist the climate action necessary, to prevent climate catastrophe, and up to 3-4C of warming.
1/🧵
Up until just a few years ago, it seemed possible/plausible, although unlikely, that major governments may have eventually agreed, to the sort of action necessary to avert climate catastrophe, such as the phasing out of fossil fuels. This hope is now completely gone/dead.
2/
This has profound implications, as to how the climate crisis should be perceived i.e. what the reality is, and the tactics necessary to prevent the climate induced collapse of our civilization. Yet the same strategies are being used, as before.
There seems to be some sort of censorship going on, because this very important thread I wrote, does not appear on my X profile timeline, despite the very clear evidence that I wrote and posted it.
As I point out here, on every other matter, where politicians/governments/the mainstream media want to change public attitude, they use widespread and repeated warnings, to create public fear of these issues.
I say the reason that governments/politicians/the media don't want to communicate climate change dangers with the fear tactics, they use to change public attitudes and opinion, with every other issue, is because they don't want the public to demand climate action
2/
Just think about it for a moment. With every other issue from drugs, smoking, crime, obesity, and now with immigration, terrorism, threats of other powers, the left, what tactics do they reach for, but fear tactics, because it works?
3/
To clarify something. I'm briefly focused on questioning the moral and ethical fitness of the current Keir Starmer Labour regime, over the planned sickness benefit cuts and the justification of the horrific genocide in Gaza. This is not because I've forgotten the climate.
1/🧵
My biggest criticism of Keir Starmer's regime, is his failure to produce any realistic climate policy, his scrapping of nature and environment protection and his focus on economic growth, to the exclusion of all else (it is what is driving the climate and ecological crisis)
2/
This illustrates that Keir Starmer and other senior cabinet members, have seriously malfunctioning moral compasses, where they are wiling to sacrifice the long term survivability of our civilization, for short term economic benefit, for the very rich.
3/
To add to this, I think it is necessary to go back to the drawing board, with the whole messaging as regards the climate, ecological and social justice crisis.
Communication over these matters, evolved out of a situation, which has either ceased to exist, or never existed.
1/🧵
The strategy all along, was to convince politicians to take the necessary action. Indeed, governments have supposedly been committed for 53 years to take action on this polycrisis.
However, they've never even attempted to take the pledged action.
Governments are so secretive, that we can never be certain about why they failed to take the action they pledged. Whether they never intended to take the action they pledged and were deceiving the public, or if something changed.
3/
We were told by members of Rishi Sunak's cabinet, and now Keir Starmer's cabinet, that there was no reason why the numbers of those claiming sickness and disability benefits were increasing.
Whilst, actually, there is a crisis of poor health in the UK's poorest communities.
2/
We keep getting told by those taken in by the right wing Tory Press, that this increase in sickness and disability isn't occurring elsewhere in Europe, but here's the evidence of sickness being higher in the UK.