I have been repeatedly warning for decades that the climate and ecological crisis, could create major food shortages and threaten our civilization far earlier than predictions imply.
As I spelled out in this thread only 2 days ago, if extreme weather events line up around the world in any given year. Extreme rainfall in some areas, lack of rainfall in others, extreme heat in others, hurricanes, - it'd cause global food shortages.
We have already seen many regional agricultural impacts, which can be compensated, by surpluses elsewhere. But what happens, if there's a perfect storm and various impacts, cause shortages across the globe?
3/
As climate change progresses, this is made more and more likely. We are already seeing a huge variety of climate impacts around the globe, from wildfires, flooding, drought, intensified tropical storms, etc. What I say, is not hypothetical, it's happening now.
4/
There is the very real possibility, that if this extreme weather lined up in a certain way, it could massively impact global food production in a given year. Before accusing me of raising hypotheticals, let me point to what is already happening.
5/
As I make clear in my thread 2 days ago, this risk starts this year, with the El Nino effects, causing warming in excess of 1.5C. I am not saying it is going to happen this year, simply that there is a quantifiable risk of it occurring.
6/
That we have sleep walked into a potential avoidable catastrophe, by taking no meaningful action in the last 30 years, and making no proper preparations for this eventuality.
As I make clear, food shortages don't have to be absolute to have major societal impacts.
7/
In a free market economy, restricted supplies of food commodities, will cause hyperinflation, making food unaffordable to many, with massive potential societal political, and geo-political implications. The free market system, itself is a major liability.
8/
The free market system, may drive prices down in times of surplus, but conversely, it also drives up prices in times of restricted supply. We are now facing the realistic prospects of restricted food supplies, due to climate change. It is a dangerous combination.
9/
I agree with the wonderful @vanessa_vash's wisdom here. Potential climate related food shortages, are no longer just an African problem, and the world should never have seen it like this. Climate Justice and equity, are important dynamics.
Once again, I am not trying to spread alarm. I am just pleading for realistic thinking and analysis.
That we are now planning to survive on luck, just hoping that extreme, climate change driven weather, doesn't combine in an unfortunate way, is dangerous and reckless.
11/
None of this danger is inevitable, and it is avoidable, if we come together, to solve this crisis cooperatively. This is the danger of the artificial competition, in the current neoliberal system, in that it inhibits cooperation, by design. We need joined up thinking.
12/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'll briefly explain why I have had to stick my head into the murky sewer of politics. I actually despise politics, and I would not spend one second thinking about it, if it wasn't putting us in such mortal danger.
1/🧵
Both the populist right, and the neoliberal centre are trying to undo what small advances had been made in advancing the cause of climate action, and action on the nature crisis.
It's no use campaigning for climate and biodiversity action, without addressing what's happening.
2/
It is no use campaigning for climate and biodiversity action without addressing the elephant in the room, being ignored, and that is the 2 big political forces in our society today, are actively trying to block the necessary action.
3/
I am sickened by the lying Trumpian right, trying to use the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk, to justify whipping up political violence against what they call the "radical left".
Such hate speech has serious consequences, which I want to illustrate with the Utøya Massacre.
1/🧵
On 22 July 2011, right wing terrorist, Anders Behring Breivik, shot dead 69 young people on the island of Utøya in Norway, attending a socialist summer camp. 33 of them under the age of 18. It remains the deadliest mass shooting ever perpetrated.
The POS Breivik, shot these young people dead, purely because they were left wing. We know that Breivik was inspired by right wing commentators, spewing right wing hate speech, because he wrote a manifesto, directly quoting them.
This is vital as the main demographic reform seems to be aimed at, are the less well off, the old working class. Generally this demographic, is the least well-informed and educated. They don't seem to understand they're backing a party, which represents the richest people.
2/
It really is quite baffling how no one has focused on a mass information programme, to reveal what Reform and it's leadership are really about.
The demographic Reform is targeted at, have been misled by decades of propaganda and disinformation from the right wing press.
3/
I'm extremely worried about the quite bizarre analysis of the Charlie Kirk shooting, by intelligent people who should know better, about the motivation of his killer. As I've said before, this is typical of a lone gun nut, random shooting.
There is currently no evidence that Tyler Robinson had been following Charlie Kirk to other parts of the country, researching him in depth, or his allies. He seems to have primarily chosen him as a target, simply because he was speaking in his locality.
3/
I want to make some observations about the Keir Starmer calamity, because Labour's problems, giving Reform an open goal they shouldn't have, cannot be fixed with Starmer changing direction or strategy. He has to go. He is fundamentally incompetent, and arrogant.
1/🧵
People keep telling me, the problem is Morgan McSweeney, not Starmer. No, if Starmer is being given bad advice by McSweeney, again and again, and is not learning from the experience, this is a Starmer problem, and not a McSweeney problem.
2/
This is not that can be fixed, by getting rid of McSweeney, because if you have a leader who fails to grasp he is being given bad advice, from experience, again and again, it can't be fixed with different advisers. An adviser's job is to advise, not to control.
3/
Remember, it is only just over 2 weeks ago, that Trump vindictively withdrew Secret Service protection for Kamala Harris. Trump has recklessly endangered Democratic, and other progressive figures, for falsely blaming them for Charlie Kirk's death.
Donald Trump, rejected calls for national unity, and made it clear that he intends to carry on inciting political violence against what he calls the radical left, which seems to mean anyone who disagrees with.