Scott Phillips Profile picture
May 22 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I want to share some data. Many people will jump to one of two thoughts: "Aha, I was right", or 'Yeah, but..." based on preconceptions. I want you to hold back on that :)

Here are some retail sales stats, showing that two things can be true at the same time.

A 🧵

1/n

#ausbiz
Are retail sales good or bad? Yes :)

Both.

Retail sales for March 2024 were up by a relatively poor 0.85%, year-on-year, in seasonally adjusted terms.

*And* up 5.5% per annum compounded (30.8% in total) over the past 5 years.

2/n Image
Let's do other categories:

Food: + 2.2% YoY, +4.9% pa last 5 yrs (27.3% total)
Household Goods: -3.1% YoY, +4.3% pa last 5 yrs (23.2% total)
Clothing/Footwear: -0.4% YoY, +6.6% pa last 5 yrs (37.8% total)
Department Stores: -0.2% YoY, +4.3% pa last 5 yrs (23.2% total)

3/n
Other Retail: +2.4% YoY, +7.2% pa last 5 yrs (41.4% total)
Cafes/Restaurants/Take Away +1.2% YoY, +6.7% pa last 5 yrs (38.1% total)

You're already doing the 'Aha' / 'Yeah but', aren't you? :)

Let's cover those off...

4/n
Is retail doing well, or badly?

Yes. Both. :)

And I think 'both' is the right word. We're preconditioned to think about year-on-year growth or decline, and fair enough. It's true that retail spending is looking pretty sickly on that basis, with interest rates biting.

5/n
And, indeed, that's what inflation tends to both be measured on and impacted by. So it's (one of) the right things to focus on.

But, a thought experiment:

6/n
If I had told you, in March 2019, that we were less than 12 months away from a once-in-a-century pandemic, and offered you a 5.5% per annum growth in retail sales over the next half-decade, would you have taken it? Would I have taken it?

Bloody oath!

But here's the thing:

7/n
Even outside a pandemic, a 5.5% annual growth in retail sales is excellent.

Another 'Yeah, but...'? Thought so. Let's talk about the two Is.

Yes, Inflation is pushing that number up. By less than you'd think, actually, over that period, but it's still contributing a lot.

8/n
And yes, immigration (properly, 'population growth') is also pushing that number up by a decent whack.

Overall, retail sales per capita fell by 3.3% over the past 12 months, and is up only 0.4% per annum over the past 5 years (+2.1% in total).

9/n
More 'Ahas' and 'Yeah buts...'? :)

The thing is, it's not either/or.

There are more people. More jobs. More retail sales.

There's also lower retail sales per capita, recently, and it's flat over the past 5 years.

Both are true.

And so?

10/n
Sorry, but there's no clear 'so'.

Immigration might have lowered per-capita retail sales. Or, it might have added to aggregate demand, and things might have been worse without it.

Inflation sucks. There's no upside here. But it's not the whole retail story.

11/n
Perhaps the key takeaway: Things are not as bad, over a longer timeframe, as they might appear.

But they're also not particularly good.

It's the result of unwelcome inflation, but also of deliberate actions to get that inflation under control.

12/n
Also, a reminder that cycles happen. They're not unusual, historically; the last 30 years, largely without them, are the unusual thing.

That doesn't make them welcome, but we should make our peace with it.

13/n
The 'so what'?

I guess that, as a society and economy, we should plan our economy, businesses and lives accordingly - and our social and economic support systems.

But I hope this has been interesting and useful.

Okay, now hit me with the 'Ahas' and 'Yes, buts...' :)

14/14

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Phillips

Scott Phillips Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TMFScottP

Mar 29, 2023
Fixing the budget? Raising more funds?

They didn't ask me.

Which is good, because I'm neither 'top', nor an 'economist'.

And you didn't ask, either.

But I've never let that stop me, so here goes.

But first, I think 'efficiency' is a grossly overrated objective.

1/n
It's an academic wet dream (with genuine respect for our academics), but it's rarely as pragmatic as it should be.

I'd put fairness and effectiveness way above efficiency.

2/n
And second, raising money for more spending is a worthy target, but the first priority should be filling the structural budget deficit. Then we can think about funding other (genuinely) worthy causes.

So, with one eye on fairness and one on effectiveness, here's what I'd do

3/n
Read 12 tweets
Mar 8, 2023
We need to stop the 'RBA Governor is out of touch' rubbish

Sustained high inflation is much worse than temporarily high(er) interest rates

You want his head on a pike for looking after the country?

Yet you're not taking the pollies to task for fiscal policy?

#ausbiz #auspol
What would you have Lowe do?

Let inflation run rampant?

It's not like there is a good choice and a bad choice.

There are two bad choices. One is slightly less bad.

That's where we are.
*Any* RBA Governor would (and, by the way, *every* central bank head, globally is) putting up rates to curb inflation.

It's the only option, unless you want to make the country even poorer.

Now, let's turn to the pollies.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 7, 2023
Look, the tabloid responses are easy. And no-one likes the pain caused by rate rises. But here's the thing:

1. Inflation, left to spiral, will destroy our standard of living.

2. Higher rates, temporarily, beat higher prices, permanently

3. Of course it's painful.

1/n
4. It's also unfair that the burden falls where it does

5. The RBA has few other options: either high inflation or high rates

6. The choice is easy (see 1. and 2. above)

2/n
7. 'Avoiding pain' for households is a seductive idea, but it's a non-starter -- the pain is either higher prices or higher rates. There's no Door #3.

8. Parliaments can do more. They should do more. But in the meantime, the RBA has no other options.

3/n
Read 6 tweets
Feb 6, 2023
Truly dystopian.

A 35 year mortgage.

Let that sink in.

When I bought my first unit, the max length was 25 years.

A 40% increase in duration in a couple of decades.

And a huge additional interest burden.

Exhibit #3522 in 'Housing policy in Australia is broken'

#ausbiz
Making housing *more affordable* by adding 5 years and $115k in repayments would do Orwell proud.

So you can:

- Raid Super
- Extend your mortgage
- Get money from the government (which pushes prices up)
- Let the government own some of your house

That, apparently, is 'policy'.
Once upon a time, 'rent money is dead money' was defensible: if you borrowed to buy a house, you'd eventually own it.

But imagine a 35yo taking out a 35 year mortgage?

Even if they never moved or refinanced, they'd retire with mortgage debt.

Bloody hell...

#auspol #ausbiz
Read 4 tweets
Sep 6, 2022
The rates conversation is - should be - complex.

Some thoughts, in an interest rate 🧵

#ausbiz #rates #RBA

1/n
There's a decent 'chart crime' - or at least a meaningful misdemeanour - on the AFR's homepage this morning:

2/n
It's rectified in the article:

BUT... that's not even close to the full picture:

(source: afr.com/policy/economy…)

3/n
Read 19 tweets
Aug 17, 2022
Today is Vietnam Veterans Day,

We remember those who served, suffered and died; those who made the ultimate sacrifice, those who bore the physical scars of their service, and those who returned, but never really left.

Welcome Home.

Lest We Forget.

Why today?

Australians commemorate Vietnam Veterans Day on the anniversary of the Battle of Long Tan, on this day in 1966.
Why 'returned but never really left'?

The Vietnam War was the first time (in no small part thanks to John Schumann's wonderful 'I Was Only 19') that post traumatic stress disorder was truly understood and accepted by the wider community.

Emotional scars often run deep and long
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(